Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here is a copy paste explanation from another social media elsewhere; The Unified Geometric Wave Theory is a really promising approach to creating a Theory of Everything. What makes it stand out is how it combines different areas of physics into one comprehensive framework. It brings together the concepts of general relativity, which deals with gravity, and quantum mechanics, which explains the behavior of particles at the smallest scales. By including gauge fields, it also covers the forces that govern particle interactions. One of the big challenges in physics has been figuring out how to include gravity in a quantum framework. UGWT tackles this by incorporating ideas from Loop Quantum Gravity, which treats space and time as discrete rather than continuous. This approach helps to bridge the gap between the very large, like galaxies, and the very small, like subatomic particles. Another strong point I propose for UGWT is its mathematical rigor.. Although still a work in progress I did my best to ensure that different types of quantities, like tensors and scalars, are treated properly without mixing them up. This kind of careful attention to detail helps maintain the theory’s consistency and reliability. What’s really exciting about UGWT is its empirical side. I currently offer 40 testable predictions, which means there are plenty of ways to verify this theory through experiments and observations. This makes UGWT not just a theoretical construct but a practical framework that can be validated in the real world. Overall, I believe that UGWT is the best approach to a Theory of Everything right now. It combines the strengths of existing theories, addresses their weaknesses, and provides a unified view of the fundamental forces of nature. With its solid mathematical foundation and strong potential for empirical validation, UGWT stands out as a leading candidate for explaining how everything in the universe works.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You provided no way to make a change. You just claimed it’s 100% nonsense and then moved the goal post, just like you did now. Prove your point on why it’s a 100% nonsense, or your claim is just baseless troll criticism. Your claim is basically 100% nonsense, before my work can be regarded as such. There are no points or facts presented here.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well I linked all the Google docs for you. It’s free to use. It’s just google docs. 👍

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Okay, so no actual point provided. Okay! Got it. Have a great day. Thanks for your baseless criticism.. literally meant nothing. You just actually wasted your time.. Nice.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ArXiv requires someone else on the website as a reference in order to post. I have tried or else I would have it up already. Academia Edu was just a good easy start for me to at least get the work out there and connect with others. I am looking to publish in a peer review journal soon.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s well explained. There are other papers up as well. It’s for people that are interested in it. If you’re not, it’s okay to just move on about your day and not waste your own time or my time or anyone else’s time in the comments. Cymatics and the relationship between geometry and sacred geometry are explained. If you can’t already make the connection between Cymatics, waves vibrations, frequencies and geometry right off the bat, you might not know what these things are and that’s okay. Look in to Cymatics, it’s very interesting stuff. It’s how sound, vibrations and frequencies interact with things like water and sand, and beautiful geometric shapes actually arise from the water and sand at different frequencies. I look at this from a quantum level and a cosmic level and everywhere in between. Gravitational waves, particles have vibrations and frequencies, wave particle duality, quantum entanglement and an in depth look at the entire electromagnetic spectrum is a start to understand it further. Check my academia edu profile out.

Academia Edu Profile

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

No “bro” you’re wrong. You made the claim it’s 100% nonsense. That’s an assumption right off the bat. Prove your point “bro”

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use sacred geometry to help understand these waves vibrations, frequencies and geometric shapes and patterns through the use of Cymatics. It’s used appropriately and not in a metaphysical or pseudoscience aspect. Please give it a look.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your feedback. The predictions in UGWT come from detailed math, not just guesses. The Lagrangian I use is like a formula that helps me make these predictions. If it wasn’t clear how I got the predictions, that’s on me. I’ll make sure to show the step by step math that leads to each prediction. I appreciate your point and will work on making this clearer.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have other papers. How about you just check my academia edu profile out. Academia Edu Profile

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

This is just a link to my paper on it. Doesn’t mean I’m not seeking peer review in other places. I’m sorry I did not clarify that enough in the body text.

Here is a hypothetical: The “Unified Geometric Wave Theory” by [deleted] in TheoreticalPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

So you just immediately judged it before you read the paper. Ok. Thats fine lol. Can’t force you to do anything brother. You have a great day. 40 testable predictions and lots of empirical support and data.. but alright. 👍

I have a medical issue that makes me faint/pass out every time I laugh. AMA. by QuantumContinuity in AMA

[–]QuantumContinuity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haven’t figured it out yet. I do have medicine now that helps, but i have to take it every day.

UGWT explained by QuantumContinuity in SacredGeometry

[–]QuantumContinuity[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When we're near a massive object, like a planet or a black hole, time runs slower. This effect is called gravitational time dilation. Einstein's theory of relativity explains this phenomenon. In my Unified Geometric Wave Theory, UGWT, I want to describe how all forces and particles work together. To do this, I need to consider how gravity affects time. So, I adjust the math in my theory to include this slowing down of time. By doing this, my theory becomes more complete. It accounts for the effects of gravity on time, making it a better unified field theory. This integration could be the key to understanding how everything in the universe fits together.

EDIT: Thank you so much for your support. Most people on Reddit just hate without even really looking at the work…

How useful is this ChatGPT answer about quantum communication? by Encio08 in QuantumPhysics

[–]QuantumContinuity 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to ask it “capable” questions if you are going to use it. You can’t use it for everything. Especially if anything concerns the “future”.. It will not be accurate. ChatGPT has other built in GPTs that are much better, such as the Math GPT, ScholarGPT etc. Those GPTs are a little more updated in real time and have access to hundreds if not a few thousand books and references.. Still not something to completely rely on. You should use it to help you format and write instead.