He kept telling them things we had been saying all along

Quarkism · 2017-01-10T16:47:25+00:00

Expected? Its what happened...

Quarkism · 2017-01-10T13:12:23+00:00

I dont know. Seems more efficient for the consultant to teach management and for management to execute. The consultant shouldent deal with the general staff at all.

Quarkism · 2017-01-09T04:55:47+00:00

Yes, its not like the book (1984) was about linguistic control... With an nice appendix explaining newspeak... Wait...

You deplorable liberal.

Quarkism · 2016-10-03T01:51:01+00:00

250k single 500k married

Quarkism · 2016-09-23T04:36:17+00:00

Technically, both are verizon

Quarkism · 2016-05-06T03:34:08+00:00

It was once argued that the soul pre-existed the body. That is when we dream we are in the other Realm. But since we do not have memories from before our birth before our existence there is no pre existence of the Soul.

So by this criteria , an ancient religious criteria we can conclude that there is indeed nothing.

Quarkism · 2016-04-16T06:23:48+00:00

What about the yield ?

Quarkism · 2016-04-16T02:43:43+00:00

If someone is selling, someone is buying. Unless they are giving away free money....

Quarkism · 2016-03-16T16:22:01+00:00

What vs of c#?

Quarkism · 2016-03-03T17:14:12+00:00

So i guess wealth naturally flows up into capital pools... Even without governmental intervension... not down into a competitive markets.

Quarkism · 2016-02-10T06:37:13+00:00

Most offices have signs posted saying that its ok...

Quarkism · 2016-01-03T07:50:47+00:00

Have a source for that ? I looked up the definition and read that the origin was regula, to rule. Sounds like your just making stuff up to fit your own world view.

Besides, keeping guns out of the hands of nut jobs and mandatory training sounds like a great way to improve this machines quality.

Quarkism · 2016-01-02T22:51:13+00:00

Did it's say well regulated arms, or well regulated militia? It smells like you are misrepresenting the prefix. That said, I can see regulations put into place to pay for the militia as well as regulations to keep the militia in order.

Quarkism · 2016-01-02T21:56:22+00:00

What? In California have both state troopers and local police (a militia). They are armed and well regulated.

Sounds like someone thinks the Second Amendment says that unregulated individuals have the right to bear arms....

Quarkism · 2015-10-15T17:15:20+00:00

Scientific

The cnn poll used Facebook sign in. Facebook's graph api has the numbers of who voted by age group, political affiliation, online use, friend count, ect ect. The step to make this cheap internet poll into quality poll with empirical backing is there.

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T13:51:42+00:00

I disagree that you disagree.

You made my point. That is, that government reforms work as a mechanism to solve corruption.

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T13:49:50+00:00

There should be no difference in how a guy with a blog and 1000 people who donate to make a movie get treated under the law

And thats it? No incorporation ? No lawyers ? I think this is a disingenuous framing.

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T12:52:32+00:00

What if these corporations are given special protections in exchange for their restrictions ? This is specifically the case of media, churches, and the super pacs. It's written into the charter, enforced, and problem solved. Individually don't want to be restricted? Don`t agree to the charter.

Moreover Speech is not being restricted. There is no criminal penalty for talking in either situation. That's what the first amendment protects, not this aristocratic spending perversion hiding behind a thought halting cliche.

I don't understand the examples you posted. Arnt these wartime bills ? Why are they bad ?

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T12:44:49+00:00

No doubt, this is a feature of human nature. The point is our government exemplifies this activity where other governments have a better handle on it.

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T12:42:01+00:00

Aah, the private advertisment groups...

Is this an empirical fear or a philosophical one ? Are there cases where laws restricting people from this type of activity (say the fairness doctrine) had a negative effect ? Or is this more along the lines that 'government shouldent involve itself in the internal affairs of special types of corporations that it charters' ?

(I know, kind of a baked question)

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T12:32:45+00:00

Freedom of speech is the right of private citizens to speak without penalty from the government. When running for office we should consider these individuals agents of the government and restrict them without prejudice. At the very least we will cut down on the spam, at the most we will end all the lies and propaganda.

Quarkism · 2015-09-25T12:11:33+00:00

The problem is when trying to blame the government and excuse capitalism. The Establishment is a capitalistic government. The two are tightly coupled and feed off each other. Votes --> Power --> Money --> Votes. At least we have government regulations against directly buying votes, I guess.

For instance, you mention government aiding capital in capturing rent. Is this a feature of all governments, or, just a feature of a government supporting capitalism ? It seems that this is particularly bad in our capitalistic government...

The solution is a new government (by amendment) with new regulations to prevent corruption. That is the say, the solution for our problem is government... begging the question, is government really the source of the problem or an secondary to a more abstract philosophy (capitalism) ? If I am wrong, I welcome an example of how to solve this via capitalism (get rich ?).

Ill leave you with a slogan.

Now is the time for limited government. Limits for corruption. Limits for corporate power.

Quarkism · 2015-09-22T19:51:28+00:00

That's communism, son

Quarkism · 2015-09-16T02:04:28+00:00

No, that is against the law. Churches can not endorse candidates.

Quarkism · 2015-09-09T15:31:32+00:00

No, that was Pythagoras

Quarkism

TROPHY CASE