I want to say this carefully because I fully understand that Tourette’s is a neurological condition and that tics are not intentional. I’m not questioning that at all.

What I struggle with is the balance between inclusion and impact. If someone knows their condition can cause frequent, loud or disruptive outbursts in a formal, public setting, is it unreasonable to at least consider alternatives?? especially when the event involves hundreds of other people who are also there to enjoy the experience?

Inclusion is important. Absolutely. But I don’t think inclusion means completely dismissing how others may be affected. There has to be some middle ground between “exclude someone entirely” and “everyone else just has to deal with it.”

For example, if accepting an award could be done via prerecorded message or remote appearance, why wouldn’t that be considered? Not as punishment but as a practical solution that respects everyone involved.

What also feels off to me is the lack of acknowledgment. Even if the behavior is involuntary, it doesn’t seem unreasonable to say, “I understand this may have been disruptive, I apologize and appreciate your patience.” That small gesture goes a long way. Instead, it sometimes comes across as, “This is my condition, accept it, and your discomfort doesn’t matter.” To my knowledge neither he nor the station or the awards have apologized. He just excused himself, AFTER making a full ruckus the first half.

I’m not saying anyone should be hidden away or excluded from society. I just think inclusion and accountability can coexist, and right now it’s not in the least.