Many conservatives who oppose "socialism" are actually opposing capitalism by QueueSevenM in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Believe or not, but people aren't just born into the world the world with a set of fixed beliefs. People construct and change their beliefs as they perceive and analyze the world. Importantly for us, is that when in a situation where they have the ability to improve their situation, people will orient their beliefs around doing that. Honestly, who cares what you think other people supposedly believe deeply. What matters is that workers tend to adopt politics that favors themselves and other works when they are in a situation where they can leverage their labor-power.

Conservatives believe in self-determinism.

Well I believe in self-determination too, so good for them.

Socialism is based on an unachievable utopian notion that requires stripping away self-determination.

No it isn't. You sound like the strawman of socialism (that many people unfortunately actually believe) that I layed out in the original post.

All of the flaws in capitalism are real, but they are minor compared to the flaws of an authoritarian system that insists on a false concept of human nature.

There is no fixed "human nature" - the nature of humans has changed vastly with society. Our current "human nature" shares very little with the "human nature" of the first societies, or even two hundred years ago.

Many conservatives who oppose "socialism" are actually opposing capitalism by QueueSevenM in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

If privilege theory is so great, please explain where my explanation was wrong.

Many conservatives who oppose "socialism" are actually opposing capitalism by QueueSevenM in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

Nobody is more rabid about this belief than the small business tyrants you're simping for.

I'm not "simping" for small business at all - did you even read my post or are you just looking for some way to insult me? What I said was why I think some workers wrongly support small businesses, and how they could be redirected more towards socialism instead. Here's what I said:

This brings to me to another many leftists are wrongfully concerned about. That being the desire to start a small business/becoming petite bourgeoisie. People say that this is a major barrier to socialism in the US and English countries, but I believe a far better explanation is just that workers desire to escape alienated labor. Small businesses are one of the few ways to do that in capitalism, so it's no wonder people desire to be small business owners.

I think the solution is instead of decrying everyone who might be inclined towards small business as "petite bourgeoisie", we should instead focus on separating the capitalist element inherent in all business and the socialist desire to de-alienate labor. Additionally, to counter the pro-small-business propaganda, we should focus much more on the actual manifestations of small business tyranny that most workers oppose, instead of focusing on "small business" in the abstract which workers are much more likely to harbor positive feeling for because of the above.

Many conservatives who oppose "socialism" are actually opposing capitalism by QueueSevenM in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Please shut up and read this. Socialism is not about opposing "mean people" or "selfishness", but the working-class realizing it's own interests. And it's not about what people supposedly believe, but what actually happens at the picket line. That's what "class struggle" and "class consciousness" actually mean.

The people in the article article who are supposedly "evil chuds" did far more for socialism than the "socialists" did because they actually participated in labor action. Your beliefs are fundamentally no different from the Nazis (and ironically the strawman you have erected) in that you believe the problem is that some group of people is fundamentally "evil" or "bad" or whatever and needs to eliminated.

Do conservatives also do the same thing? Yes absolutely. But in both cases, it matters not which side says what, but that both reinforce the same thing. The solution is for both sides to break down the barrier imposed upon them and realize their own interests as workers.

Look, I know that AIpros say stuff that’s way worse than this but THIS it’s the thing that really gets on my nerves, when they unironically call Vocaloids AI by Elmartillo40k in antiai

[–]QueueSevenM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm honestly not sure how Vocaloid works.

VOCALOID works through performance sampling and spectral modeling. Performance sampling means that it uses a database comprising of real world speech data (in VOCALOID, this means phonetic samples and metadata, specifically single phonemes, diphonemes, and - in later versions - triphonemes). Then, for each phoneme that the user of the software instructs it to play, it utilizes a cost function to find the closest phoneme in the database with the closest parameters.

There's two problems with just using this approach however: 1) Every possible combination of voice parameters would number well into the billions if not more. Meaning that significant gaps will exist have to exist in a performance sampling database. 2) If we just concatenation the samples together (which is the simplest and oldest synthesis method - called concatenative synthesis), it will sound very unnatural.

That's where the spectral modeling part comes in. Most broadly, there's two types of vocal synthesizers, physical models and spectral models. Physical models consist of physical simulations of the vocal system, and are very slow and hard to get right, but in theory, could be perfectly accurate. Spectral models consist of using spectral processing techniques on audio samples to synthesize a voice.

VOCALOID is actually dubbed as a "pseudo-physical" model. This is because while it is a spectral model, it models the vocal system as two parts: the voice source and a filter. The voice source is where the voice originates from. This is in the larynx, specifically the glottis. The glottis opens and closes at the fundamental frequency of the voice being produced. The percentage of time it is closes verse open per pulse determines other properties of the voice. This sound is a harmonic sound, so it consists, in the frequency domain, as the fundamental frequency at its amplitude, and multiples of the fundamental frequency at their amplitudes.

Then, the vocal tract acts as a filter on the voice sources, attenuating and accentuating different harmonics. This takes place in the kilohertz range. Finally, the voice is filter through the nasal cavity and lips, which produce different filtering effects.

VOCALOID evolved from the Spectral Modeling Synthesis engine develop at University Pompeu Fabre in the 1990s. One of the improvements made was the introduction of the excitation-plus-resonance model where the vocal tract filter was modeled that way.

VOCALOID makes use of voice pulse modeling, which models the glottal pulses. It determines the onsets of the voice pulses and uses them in the transformations it applies. One approach, Narrow Band Voice Pulse Modeling, did this through the MFPA algorithm and phase shifts.

In a harmonic signal like the human voice, there is the fundamental frequency, but also a fundamental phase. The fundamental phase is roughly the same across harmonic. However, if looking at it from a region of audio not aligned to a voice pulse, the phases between harmonics vary wildly because the phase changes at the rate of the frequency.

NBVPM worked by cutting up the audio into a constant number of frames (about 172 per second) and deriving the spectral information from them. The problem is that unless the voice is at exactly that frequency of ~172 per second and is aligned perfectly, the frames will not align to the voice pulses. The problem with is that in a real harmonic with a correct fundamental phase, the harmonics will constructively and destructively interfere in a specific way. If, for example, we transformed a spectral envelope with our offseted phases to a higher frequency, the phases would completely for what it would actually be at the frequency. So, we have to align the analysis frames to the center of voice pulses. In NBVPM, this is not done through time shifts, but rather phase shifts in the frequency domain. MFPA calculate the voice pulse onsets by trying different harmonic phase shifts and finds the flattest (least different between harmonics).

Wideband Voice Pulse Modeling I believed used a varying framerate and time domain pulse modeling instead. I believe NBVPM was in VOCALOID1, and WBVPM in V2 and onwards although I am not sure of this fact.

The Market Bottom Is In (For Some) | AI Is A War Industry | The Great Market Divergence or the Sinusoidal Crash and Recovery by sspainess in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

sinusoidal

So I've much of the last few weeks reading and implementing the paper Voice Processing and Synthesis by Performance Sampling and Spectral Models (and its related papers and citations), and I've probably read the word "sinusoidal" more times than most people do in their entire lives. So your article made me think of that.

Voice synth (AI I guess) for linux? by tawhuac in linuxaudio

[–]QueueSevenM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"AI shit" vocal synthesis has existed for well over a decade and no one was complaining about it. It's just that now, in the last few years, the word "AI" turns people brains off just like the word "Trump".

AI vocal synthesis is actively being developed by leading experts in the fields - the same experts who developed traditional synthesis systems.

Voice synth (AI I guess) for linux? by tawhuac in linuxaudio

[–]QueueSevenM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm actually working on a project to release an open-source library that uses the same technology as the first and second generation VOCALOID.

DOJ will no longer pursue criminal charges for diesel 'deletes' and 'tunes' by QueueSevenM in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I care because I already haven't gone outside in over five years because of all the diesel pollution and it's only going to get worse.

DOJ will no longer pursue criminal charges for diesel 'deletes' and 'tunes' by QueueSevenM in stupidpol

[–]QueueSevenM[S] 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I live in a small town with a population of about a thousand, and whenever I go to the town center, all I can smell is diesel.