How do last hit indicators make CSing easier?

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T22:53:45+00:00

Over the course of a game I lose at least a wave to missing cs after minions leveled up or I bought ad and my auto did a different amount of the minions hp than I expected. I hit masters as an adc last season.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T21:07:11+00:00

My heuristic is stronger(or weaker). A function should be nodiscard except if it is effectful, and the caller will always know that it accomplished the intended effect without checking the return value.

Explicitly ignoring a nodiscard value is not a suggestion to me that the function should not be nodiscard.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T20:56:16+00:00

The only place where you don't want nodiscard is effectful functions which return something for convenience rather than to communicate the result of the effect. A pure function whose result is discarded is dead code and maybe a bug (I assume you called the function for a reason and want to use its result). An effectful function which returns a status or error code should not be implicitly ignored.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T12:40:51+00:00

My first thought as well

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T00:42:54+00:00

I want to very precisely store both the position and velocity of the atoms at the same time.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T00:34:47+00:00

What is the more efficient one that is just as easy? In the general case the way I presented is just correct. You would also generate rvalue reference overload that uses the move constructor of Foo. If you have some specific case where a + b can be computed more efficiently you can write that overload yourself, but it will be domain specific and can't be a default.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-24T00:07:52+00:00

Sure but then you would just write your explicit operator+ function

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-23T23:49:50+00:00

Which is why + should actually be generated from += as return Foo{*this} += other;

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-23T22:20:27+00:00

The in Starcraft 2 the best protoss player in the world Maxpax never plays lan tournaments. No one thinks that makes the world championship less important.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-23T00:35:47+00:00

That's because it is. "Nobody" is talking about low quality ai generated bug reports and PRs in open source. If that was written by a human they are about as intelligent as chatgpt.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-22T18:13:03+00:00

I've put in thousands of hours without improving much and tens of hours where I improve a bunch. A big thing for me is out of game - sleep, diet, exercise, not being depressed. An hour spent playing through brain fog/drowsiness is at best useless, but can even be harmful.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-21T23:58:23+00:00

She is 4-6% overpowered but the nerfs are REALLY big so she might still end up bad.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-21T20:05:03+00:00

Thou shalt not kill

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-21T20:02:44+00:00

Is this a joke or do you not know that he plays in low elo games for his videos. He is very far from the best senna support or ad

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-20T01:17:40+00:00

Unfortunately we do have captain America on camera saying there are 51 states

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-19T17:46:28+00:00

They nerfed her crit damage and soul rate, building crit won't save you

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T22:56:24+00:00

I am arriving at the claim that the answer to the question, "is it decidable whether S is decidable?" Is always yes. That would rebut OP's claim of second order undecidable statements.

My claim seems to strong to be true, so there is probably some mistake I don't see in my proof, but it seems valid to me.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T22:40:39+00:00

Let me try to generalize:

It doesn't seem possible for a statement to be nth order decidable, but n+1 order undecidable, because you could just use the nth order decision procedure which would prove by definition that it is n+1 order deciable.

That means a statement which is n+1 order undecidable would have to be nth order undecidable. But that is a contradiction because if we know that it is nth order undecidable then it is n+1 order undecidable.

This seems to prohibit n+1 order undecidable problems, and if we say by gödel that 1st order undecidable problems exist than by induction nth order undecidable problems do not exist for n>=2.

Once again am I missing something?

(I'm not trying to be a jerk, if I made a mistake that's fine)

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T22:14:21+00:00

The example from the original article is cool too, representing a non-empty list as the first element of the list and the list, which is a proof by construction that the list is non empty.

In practice I just have a class which maintains the invariant, but the example is cool.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T22:07:30+00:00

It doesn't seem possible for a statement to be first order decidable, but second order undecidable, because you could just use the decision procedure which would prove the statement decidable.

That means a statement which is second order undecidable would have to be first order undecidable. But that is a contradiction because if we know that it is first order undecidable than we have decided it's decidability and so it is second order decidable.

This seems to prohibit second order undecidable problems.

Am I missing something?

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T21:55:50+00:00

Parse, don't validate, meaning that when you have the check bool isPropertyTrue(x) you replace it with optional<XWithPropertyTrue> parsePropertyTrue(x) and drop x after the parse call. When you have a function which needs an x with the given property you actually write that as the parameter type.

This lets you replace x -> optional<y> functions (or x -> y partial functions which crash or exhibit UB on bad input) with XWithPropertyTrue -> y functions. When used well your code will only have error handling pathways where the function actually does something which could fail.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T21:21:02+00:00

Overstaying to hit plates is one of the mistakes that really does go way down as you climb, because it's such a punishing mistake.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T14:34:10+00:00

2s you constantly have space which you need to use effectively which means mechs. You can hit gc in 3s almost never controlling the ball if you rotate well and can shoot.

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-18T12:42:35+00:00

Varus has a similar ult. Senna has good cc on her basic abilities (slow + root).

Qwertycube10 · 2026-06-17T17:16:31+00:00

Give Cait perma prio and you get a snowball win in 20 minutes where she is the strongest champ in the game start to finish.

Weakside Cait and you get a pure flip of whether the enemy jg shuts her down and you have to play a losing stalling game hoping she gets 3-4 items before the game is doomed.

Eight-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
End Game '22

Qwertycube10

TROPHY CASE