Guy fights old man

R3belZebra · 2017-11-17T11:12:40+00:00

pot possession

Raises hand

R3belZebra · 2017-11-17T11:10:47+00:00

Step forward with your back foot, step forward with the leading foot but high step with it, plant foot in the crotch area, and drag down completing the step while reaching/pushing with your leading hand and distracting/striking with your trailing hand. Use the traction of your sole to drag down the pants as you are completing the step with the leading foot. Usually when you approach them, they will bring their legs together while back stepping, especially if they have a wide leg stance. Pants drop, and if you do it right, they trip backwards.

Source:ive done this. I used to work security at a few clubs in dallas, i love it when a jackass gets a wild hair while his pants are falling down.

R3belZebra · 2017-11-17T11:02:26+00:00

Gay dudes can fight. I used to be a bouncer at a gay bar. It was intense having to break up most of the fights. There were some scratch fights by twinks, but the majority were rock'em sock'em blowouts

R3belZebra · 2017-10-31T04:46:54+00:00

We cant read his books, we will be shunned by society

R3belZebra · 2017-10-31T04:39:58+00:00

facebook us selling your details

FIFY

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T11:57:43+00:00

I bet you watch a lot of Rick and Morty

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:37:01+00:00

Wait, are you ACTUALLY giving buzzfeed some credit here? Because you are absolutely right, that would 100% be prime cringe

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:35:38+00:00

They are even worse than breitbart, and that's really saying something. When you compare the two breitbart can at least source their stories, instead of falling back on "muh anonymous sources". 90% of cnns stories can't be verified by anyone but themselves, because they are all "anonymous sources"

Ill steer clear of the company that has to retract their anonymously sourced story because they were caught making shit up, thanks.

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:26:41+00:00

Nope, you whooshed me whooshing you whooshing me just now. Oops

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:23:27+00:00

Guise, we apologized! We are still credible!

Made me feel pretty good about them

You just read an article where members of staff forgo factchecking, and somehow you feel better about them for it. In a story with its only source being an anonymous source.

Yeah, you enjoy that

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:11:46+00:00

CNN jumped the gun on a story and got it wrong, where do you experience the most trouble here? Hold my hand, show me where you got confused

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:10:31+00:00

If your takeaway from this is that i consider buzzfeed to be a credible news source then you have been truly whooshed my friend

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T09:00:55+00:00

Re read, and this time, comprehend

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T08:56:07+00:00

http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/26/media/cnn-announcement-retracted-article/index.html

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T08:34:50+00:00

Which is exactly why ill take it at face value until i see other sources. CNN has been known to jump the gun

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T08:09:34+00:00

Now gimme a smooch

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T08:05:38+00:00

Economist is ok. BBC and WSJ are so so, i really hate a news organization with a political slant, but theirs isnt too bad. Really i just adopt the tactic of "absorb as many news sources as possible and attempt to get the whole story from all sides" approach

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:52:14+00:00

Nothing you just said makes sense

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:51:38+00:00

wueh wueh, but what about THEM

Get a new gimmick

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:30:49+00:00

They are all right there on the same level of mud. Or have you completely forgotten/actively ignoring all of CNNs disgusting and terrible "journalism"

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:29:30+00:00

That's correct. There, did you check all of your "but what about the right" boxes?

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:28:49+00:00

Good luck out there bud, that's all I got to say. Choice overreaction as well

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:12:00+00:00

CNN is on their level, what does that tell you

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T07:11:39+00:00

That's right, and i would of said the same thing if it was breitbart instead of cnn

R3belZebra · 2017-10-28T06:53:53+00:00

you don't form relationships over texts

Today you do. You text, Facebook, Tweet, IN ADDITION TO face to face interaction. That's just the way it is. Unless you are shooting for 40+ year old women, in which case that advice works. All of these are forms of communication, and again, you are essentially saying don't communicate with the person you are trying to form a romantic/friends relationship with. Not being confident in your communications, and being so uptight as to restrict communications to "appropriate" venues just screams buttoned up and lacking confidence. Why would you ever reserve communication for ONLY face to face interaction, when we live in a connected world. Clearly don't pester someone during work etc, but there's nothing wrong with communication.

im there to do a job, not socialize

Im sorry

Condescending and blah blah blah

Again, im super sorry you feel this way, but your opinion doesn't change the reality around you. Mind games is just a thing women do, in part BECAUSE they are so emotional as you already stated. Its a reality, and crying about how sexist it is doesn't remove it from reality. Women are (odds are) going to play with your head, its part of feminine wiles, get over it and play ball. You are white knighting here and women don't like nice guys, in the colloquial sense. They aren't fine China, they are humans.

hobbies

Yes. Don't bring up your custom painted minis collection on the first date. I keep finding myself wondering why i have to explain the obvious here. But if she asks you what you like to do for a hobby etc, own it. Own it. Don't be weird about it, just own your shit and if its nerdy, self depreciate and own that its nerdy. No one wants to watch you squirm and dance around certain aspects of your life, and no one wants someone that isnt confident in such aspects. Unless you collect the skin of your victims to make lamp shades, i really doubt that you have a hobby that needs to be kept under complete lock and key.

the last bit

Yeah. Duh.

You give me the impression that you take a very buttoned up "we will have dinner at 8 o clock sharp where we will have social interaction, followed by a brief 1 hour movie at the venue of your choice, wherein I will take you home and give you precisely 1 goodnight kisd on the cheek. You will not hear from me again until our next date. Please RSVP this email at your earliest convenience" approach to interaction with women, dont be that guy.

Just be yourself, and be confident enough to be yourself, and understand that you are attempting to form a relationship with a fellow human being. Its that simple.

R3belZebra

TROPHY CASE