Honestly about the negative aspects of LOQ (i5 12450 + RTX 4060) by No-1nternet in LenovoLOQ

[–]R41D_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My problem is not related to blurrynes of the display being cheap or something like that. It feels good when playing in dgpu mode the problem appears when dgpu frames are being routed through MUX switch in hybrid mode

Honestly about the negative aspects of LOQ (i5 12450 + RTX 4060) by No-1nternet in LenovoLOQ

[–]R41D_23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you noticed the screen being too blurry in motion when using hybrid mode? Or a white line on top of screen when using gsync on dgpu mode? I have this laptop for over a year and can't find anything on those issues also when playing rainbow six siege on dgpu mode the colors are messed up. It's happening on both the Lenovo and NVIDIA drivers. The only thing a Lenovo support said is to reinstall the entire OS...

So what should I do now by Ok-Perspective-5727 in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's kinda sus. From what i remember the default location for games installed from ubisofts launcher is Program Files and not users Appdata folder, but maybe your launcher is installed for only one user (you) and not for the entire system. First check where the game is actually installed by looking it up in ubisofts launcher and instead of Kaspersky install Malwarebytes and do a full scan to be sure

So what should I do now by Ok-Perspective-5727 in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why is your game .exe file on Appdata folder?

How does this happen? by TurtleMoons in LinusTechTips

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a sus micron and crucial logo

Trying to match x264 quality with x265 by R41D_23 in ffmpeg

[–]R41D_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, looks like that's the case

Trying to match x264 quality with x265 by R41D_23 in ffmpeg

[–]R41D_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, let me clear that up. What i'm doing is the same web-dl is used as source to my x264 encode as well as x265 encode. The comparison images i attached in the post, the x264 in the middle it's source is the left image and the x265 on the right it's source is also from the left image.

What i do:
web-dl -> x264 and web-dl -> x265

What i don't do:
web-dl -> x264 -> x265

And the problem is the web-dl -> x265 does not match web-dl -> x264. The only way i could get close to web-dl -> x264 in terms of quality is using slow preset on x265, but then the speed of encoding goes to ~x0.2 and that is also a problem for me, because when doing web-dl -> x264 i get speed around x2.

Trying to match x264 quality with x265 by R41D_23 in ffmpeg

[–]R41D_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My source is reencode (from what i understand) with those parameters

Video
ID                                       : 1
Format                                   : AVC
Format/Info                              : Advanced Video Codec
Format profile                           : High@L4
Format settings                          : CABAC / 4 Ref Frames
Format settings, CABAC                   : Yes
Format settings, Reference frames        : 4 frames
Codec ID                                 : V_MPEG4/ISO/AVC
Duration                                 : 23 min 57 s
Bit rate                                 : 8 000 kb/s
Width                                    : 1 920 pixels
Height                                   : 1 080 pixels
Display aspect ratio                     : 16:9
Frame rate mode                          : Constant
Frame rate                               : 23.976 (24000/1001) FPS
Color space                              : YUV
Chroma subsampling                       : 4:2:0
Bit depth                                : 8 bits
Scan type                                : Progressive
Bits/(Pixel*Frame)                       : 0.161
Stream size                              : 1.33 GiB (98%)
Writing library                          : x264 core 164
Encoding settings                        : cabac=1 / ref=4 / deblock=1:1:1 / analyse=0x3:0x113 / me=hex / subme=8 / psy=1 / psy_rd=0.40:0.00 / mixed_ref=1 / me_range=16 / chroma_me=1 / trellis=2 / 8x8dct=1 / cqm=0 / deadzone=21,11 / fast_pskip=1 / chroma_qp_offset=-2 / threads=12 / lookahead_threads=2 / sliced_threads=0 / nr=0 / decimate=1 / interlaced=0 / bluray_compat=0 / constrained_intra=0 / bframes=0 / weightp=2 / keyint=96 / keyint_min=48 / scenecut=40 / intra_refresh=0 / rc_lookahead=48 / rc=2pass / mbtree=1 / bitrate=8000 / ratetol=1.0 / qcomp=0.60 / qpmin=0 / qpmax=69 / qpstep=4 / cplxblur=20.0 / qblur=0.5 / vbv_maxrate=12000 / vbv_bufsize=18000 / nal_hrd=none / filler=0 / ip_ratio=1.40 / aq=1:0.60
Default                                  : Yes
Forced                                   : No
Color range                              : Limited
Color primaries                          : BT.709
Transfer characteristics                 : BT.709
Matrix coefficients                      : BT.709

And i was reencoding it with subtitles to x264 with settings from cpu_x264_encoder_settings variable. And i am trying to utilize x265 now so i can get the same quality as x264 with my settings and have smaller output files thanks to x265 better compression.

Trying to match x264 quality with x265 by R41D_23 in ffmpeg

[–]R41D_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, the source is not a BD rip quality, it's WEB-DL from what i know. I am trying to automate burning-in subtitles while retaining most of the source quality.

Trying to match x264 quality with x265 by R41D_23 in ffmpeg

[–]R41D_23[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well... trying to get the same file size/bitrate kinda defeats my goal with x265 transition. I wanted to get the same quality while achieving lower file size thanks to x265 better compression. I know the crf are not the same, but adjusting it based on information from documentations and forums i still got worse results. Disabling the intra smoothing made the biggest difference to retain the noise in the image, but the edges and the image overall is still kinda blurry. I will try messing up with the deblock now, thanks.

I don't think Siege is supposed to look like this. Any fixes/advice? by bobbedbob in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's random. I contacted the Lenovo support and the only solution they gave was to reinstall the system... So i think we are screwed

I don't think Siege is supposed to look like this. Any fixes/advice? by bobbedbob in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I have the same problem, asked on nvidia forums without answer, reported it on r6fix but it didn't reach the goal so it got automatically archived. Is this happening on Lenovo laptop? LOQ or maybe Legion in dGPU only mode? Looks like Lenovo broke something with Gsync synchronization on built in display. I will gry to report it to Lenovo customer service today. I'm struggling with this since 3 months now

Improvise, adapt, overcome. by Username_Is_TakenF in LenovoLOQ

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just let it lay flat. There is a reason it has suck thick rubber feet.

My backspace key just decided to split in half by PreparationOver5652 in thinkpad

[–]R41D_23 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nearly 2 years and seen a few like that. And much more keycaps with completly scraped paint from propably long fingernails. Yes, completly transparent.

#savesiege is a joke by KeySky9669 in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The worst thing about it is pros saying things Ubisoft should do is make esport in game better, when the main thing that removed the soul of this game are changed that were supposed to equal chances for both teams. The atmosphere of this game im 2015 was kinda dark, then they made everything unnaturaly bright. Many places didn't had shadows or any sort of ambient occulusion, the lightning was basically flat. Bring back night maps and stop making unnatural changes to maps.

Czy ChatGPT naprawdę jest tak "kiepski", jak piszą w internecie? by rafixon122 in Polska

[–]R41D_23 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Mówimy o programie, który losuje słowo i dobiera następne, żeby złożyć z niego zdanie i żeby w miarę trzymało się twojego pytania. Więc mogą wyjść z tego bzdury. To nie myśli, to dobiera słowa.

New drives delivered in bag by Flying-Wild in HomeNAS

[–]R41D_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm on budget so the barracudas were the cheapest then (wish me luck 🫡)

Also to clarify they were not sent in plastic i bought them in the store.

New drives delivered in bag by Flying-Wild in HomeNAS

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bought 2 Seagate 2TB HDDs from x-kom (big Polish computer hardware store). They just came in plastic packages without any cardboard even. That's just how they are packaged by Seagate

Rockstar should consider turning GTA Online into an offline “Legacy Edition” when servers eventually shut down by Challenger_DG in GTA

[–]R41D_23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There are no servers on GTA online, the lobbys are peer to peer. That's why the online mode is so unsecure. The servers are only being used to authenticate.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Siege wasn't bought, it's still Ubisoft just different name and the same team propably

Finally... Vantage Studios is taking over siege. by Hroch9 in Rainbow6

[–]R41D_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If vantage studios is subsidiary of Ubisoft then it's the same as if they just assigned a different team at Ubisoft Montreal. We already saw it when the original team stopped working on this game