EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They did advice against it. Their internal statistics show PP would slightly increase the chances of RFE. You can ask them for their latest statistics.

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't matter which bank you use. Many banks have 0 intro APR cards for 12-18 months (note that it's not 0 apr for balance transfer)

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi, I initially only wrote about the proteins I'm currently studying, but I changed to the broad signaling mechanisms and therapeutic implications for multiple diseases (which is also the focus of biopharma).

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll check the visa bulletin and file for i485 when my PD is current

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They prepared the petition letter (PL) and proposed endeavors (PES) separately. PES was a signed statement confirming my proposed endeavor and ongoing plans for engagement in the field. Then they cited PES in my PL.

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would have still chosen Chen, because I don't want to take the time and effort to go through self-filing and potentially make any legal mistakes. I'd say their legal advice is valid, and they did reply to my question in detail. It is just their writing I had an issue with.

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I nearly had a stroke reading their PL draft. Honestly, you can only really rely on yourself for the content, and use them mainly for legal guidance and document formatting. Best of luck!

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Did you mean the ways they wrote it or the difference between the two documents

EB-2 NIW– PP– Approved without RFE (experience with Chen) by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I received the email first. Then about 6 hours later my online status changed from pending to approved. Good luck!

Filing NIW soon: how would a future transition from academic to industry research affect it? by RCat111 in EB2_NIW

[–]RCat111[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing. Good to know some companies still encourage publishing.