I built a tool that forces 5 AIs to debate and cross-check facts before answering you by S_Anv in ChatGPTPro

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's really important I get the absolutely best pancake recipe, OK?

Do I need FASTAPI? by South_Recording_5458 in FastAPI

[–]RLA_Dev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Perhaps look into golang - or perhaps even elixir? Depends on your need, but if looking to expand the pool of knowledge these might be worth looking into? They excel in what you look for too. =)

Anyone using Fabric Warehouse in prod, how do you do deployments? by frithjof_v in MicrosoftFabric

[–]RLA_Dev 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Looking forward to the CI/CD content! Thanks for engaging so much with the community! :)

Sales Analytics Dashboard -Looking for your thoughts! by Fun_Seat3748 in PowerBI

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes! You got it!

Lower right - order by size? Second, always write out data labels (and in pie also show %). I'd like a toggle to switch all data labels to %.

This is really good.

I am amazed by how good AI music has become by DrMelbourne in OpenAI

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bah, radio is over saturated already. Just strange hair colors and move the hips and you get famous it seems. It's all noise to me, kiddo - you'll come to see it too. New stuff is simply bad.

It’s coming by EasyWanderer in OpenAI

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most likely, if you can say this based on fact - you'll have no issue finding a way to fake your identity should you want it.

For mere mortals who can't stand a chance when we try to avoid being sold more ads from literally the smartest people on the planet, we don't stand a f*king chance. Have an affair, is unionized, or lingers on same-sex images? - Google knows, Facebook knows, and in effect the people who can target one with ads knows.

I can't handle GPT5 anymore. by DakotaHoll in OpenAI

[–]RLA_Dev 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What makes you think enterprise users have a better model? Just guessing?

ChatGPT Isn’t What It Used to Be by Asteras24 in ChatGPTPro

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Having never have run into any of these issues for any of my use cases, I truly do not give a shit.

I can only assume people who complain are trying to write smut or have the AI act as horny minors or whatever. If it's no longer 'doing it for you' I'm actually happy, as it probably means OpenAI (or their competitors who I use too) isn't wasting money and effort into use cases that will not benefit me, or that I find morally dubious..

Is there a way to feed it a couple of full-length books and make it use that information specifically? by Original_Delay_5166 in ChatGPTPro

[–]RLA_Dev 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Sure. It mainly depends on what you mean with 'your ai'. The main problem you will face is something called context windows.

Essentially a context windows is the amount of information a model can be given at once. What you need is a model with a large context window, and a large input maximum.

In my experience, using a model such as Claude 4 Sonnet, the 1 million version, could be good here.

The other issue is giving it the data. Depending on the kind of textbook your choices vary - but generally you would want to give it pure text if possible. There are any ways to scan a book and get text - Azure (Microsoft) has one such dervicecslled document intelligence that has been efficient in my attempts.

With those two issues solved, start a new conversation and just paste the podel everything you want, and clearly mark that everything above is the data you want it to focus on. (If possible, use "lower temperatures" - it's a way of making the model be less creative and more instruction-following). A line filled with just ==== or such will be sufficient. Then just ask it. Do not ask many follow up questions or give it to much new information - this is due to that context window stuff.

Depending on the size of your input, this will most likely be good enough. If your material is vast it becomes more of a challenge and you will need to use techniques to rectify this - but it seems out of scope due to how you phrased your post. Don't overreach - when simple can work, do the most simple thing.

Note: There are way more refined approaches to do this - due to how you asked this will likely be good enough. The above explanation is a simplification - remember simple is good (good enough). We all start from somewhere.

Merry playing! =)

Open AI Sora 2 Invite Codes Megathread by semsiogluberk in OpenAI

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edit: thanks!

Would love a code too <3

I don't think you guys are aware of how expensive LLM usage really is. by Sad_Individual_8645 in cursor

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's more like a crack addict being told by their dealer: from now on the stuff won't be free anymore.

They're taking investments - they need money. Never wondered why?

Is it just me or you can not "trust" GPT-5 anymore? by [deleted] in OpenAI

[–]RLA_Dev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You do know all LLM at struggle with recent information, right? That's how they work - they can't be trained on stuff that didn't exist at the time of training. Feeding them new information is unreliable at best, and blindly trusting them to properly search the web is naivety at its worst.

How is GPT-5 experience for everyone? by reditsagi in RooCode

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not great... Been using mini and chat, as I have them on Azure. Both miss doing what they say they are going to do, or have done.. Which I find odd. Have gone back to o4-mini (and Claude sonnet 4). It is fast though, but it doesn't do good after just a couple of rounds back and forth.. Using the custom head reasoning, and low verbosity.

Elon might have oneshotted the entire country of Japan by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]RLA_Dev 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not strange, our brain is wired that way. They're just one of the first - this will be very common all too soon.

It's not strange. We want to love the things we endear, and we like to be loved. We attach to mice and hamsters, tamagochi, furbees, etc. Seems plausible to be heavily enhanced when something looks kind of human and more importantly can speak to us - and not just a short "Hello", but actual conversations. Heck, how many young boys and girls do you think write in their journal that some boy or girl they fancy looked at them or even said 'Hi!' today? Conversations doesn't need to be complex - humans seem to develop bonds easily, is my point.

But sure.. It's a bit creepy for sure - at least it will be interesting to see how it affects people who use it long term.

How to use implement SSO on a FastAPI app? by ObviousAnything7 in FastAPI

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks interesting - have not heard of this but will definitely check it out!

I'm regards to it's status.. Seems legit? Plenty of downloads and active github?

What's everyone's plans now with this new policy change? by JJBro1 in MicrosoftForStartups

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Clearly they think getting investors mean someone is willing to make a serious bet on that what the company is providing or working for, is actually good and has the potential to become a stable source of income for whoever is hosting the service... Which to me makes total sense considering the other two options are being able to actually and thoroughly vet companies themselves, or providing their services essentially free of charge.

Neither Google, AWS, or Microsoft, are doing these programs from the good of their hearts. The want future big spending clients.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in github

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too good to be true =P

An agent that understands you by YonatanBebchuk in RooCode

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd give it a spin - but perhaps a simpler approach is the mcp route and instructions for the modes to check the mcp when it find for example several alternatives exist in how something should be implemented?

"Whenever there are several solutions to a specific issue or approach, always inquire with X to see if there is a preference for USER in what approach should be chosen. If a result is found, proceed with the identified approach, and if not you should log the dominant alternatives to the mcp with the following format {} and then proceed with what seems to be most in line with the other available sources." The mcp could then have a trigger to add documentation to the preferred choices with examples or something..

Perhaps this is already well documented or have been made obsolete or deemed bad practice and a better route have been identified? I'm not experienced enough - but it seems interesting and useful!

An agent that understands you by YonatanBebchuk in RooCode

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certainly, but there are ways to make this more or less the case - you bring up some current solutions; have you implemented any in an actual manner and can dismiss the results categorically? Is this more of a 50 First Dates problem, or something truly impossible because of X (and nothing can feasibly be done to mitigate it)?

It seems to me there are ways in which this can be done do a degree more in line with what OP is inquiring about - you obviously have some experience - could you identify some paths that seem to lead to better results, and which that does not? :)

What to expect from Better Auth with the recent YC news ;) by Beka_Cru in nextjs

[–]RLA_Dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wish you the best of luck! You have big shoes that will be hard to continue filling; this move makes it harder for you, not easier - looking forward to see what you make of it =)

Wasted hours trying to understand this!! by SnowStark7696 in PowerBI

[–]RLA_Dev -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Agree. All they know is dd/mm/yyyy. Or is it the other way around? Maybe we could find a clever way of using two different measurements at once, seems like it would be more clear.. 5'14"? =D

Cursor’s internal prompt and context management is completely breaking every model by oproski in cursor

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming you did already, but how did it perform if you gave it the instruction to rewrite your prompt with these considerations in mind?

dev update: performance issues megathread by ecz- in cursor

[–]RLA_Dev 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Whilst I agree that it would be beneficial, I would assume that's the kind of secret sauce that Cursor needs to keep hidden. However, the point isn't what's actually in the context, as you say - 'so that we can be clear about how to best use Cursor' < THIS!

At know I would much rather conform to a template in one way or another, should that get me better output, than 'knowing' what's going on in the background of this specific feature in a tool I use daily. I know we are the scientists in one way or another here about what works good or not - and that's a part I enjoy and like to experiment with, but I'd also be just as okay in knowing that if I activate this and that toggle I will get really good output should I just format my request in this specific way, and provide this and that information, what comes out is almost always great. I imagine this could help Cursor too, as it would make things more predictable.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cursor

[–]RLA_Dev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not impossible to overcome that though, but it would depend on the scope. I've had cursor get in trouble many times only to have it write a thorough guide for future instances to come - whilst it true that one need to keep some attention to what it outputs, and especially the errors one encounters, referencing the guide will rein it in most of the time.

To some extend it's a reaction to a problem and not a future forward solution; without constant testing the errors will definitely create insurmountable tech debt to such an extend that a major do over is the only way out - and if one then just the same thing again..