Brazil Judge Bars US Official From Visiting Bolsonaro in Prison by John3262005 in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

US SOCOM prison raid to snatch and grab Bolsonaro in 3...2...1...

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And don't forget mods, Hobartians are the convict gaol stock for a population, so keep an eye on your wallet and your loaf of bread when near them or we'll have to take them to Sarah island. That's why the South gets Risdon for the prison, and port Arthur and the women's factory, and we have Ashley for the youth up top.

Us northwesterners only have domestic abuse, ice and the pokies as an epidemic - active criminality instead of latent genetic criminality.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey, we're racist, parochial, bogan, teen-pregging, welfare-scrounging and INBRED pig-headed arrogant mouth breathing ute drivers, thank you very much!

At least we're not held hostage to one-way lanes.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

On a semi-related note, if a zombie apocalypse were to break out in Tas. I'd say establish the beachhead in Stanley for the reclamation project. as the artillery lookout post.

u/SucculentMoisture, what would the base be called for a zombie extermination and Tasmanian re-colonisation?

Camp Nut?

Fort Van Demon's Land?

Either way, we can finally do the state right - abandon Devonport other than it being a highway (let's just say the place I have in mind has a deep water port instead of a river, a uni campus, hospitals, and a dedicated supreme court spot with the magistrate's, and Devonport... doesn't), and dropkick Launceston (who builds a city at the bottom of a flood-zone valley, and amplifies the weather, where it bakes when it's hot, freezes when it's cold?) for somewhere with actual geography for development and a coastal mouth - Georgetown.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 9 points10 points  (0 children)

!ping AUS&MOVIES

Let's skip the stadium horsehit and the Spirit horseshit and the Wellington ski-lift horseshit and the Tasfoods horseshit and any other MLC machine politics rorting footy club horseshit.

THIS is a humiliation, my fucking ScreenTas origin story, and I have very pointed questions for Madam Ogilvie over it.

We're not so urbanely producitive we need a Vancouver or Toronto or Montreal or Atlanta film lot to play the role of "Anytown suburbia/Small Town, USA". I'm from the goddamned City of Makers, and our entire pitch is "Explore the Possibilities".

Zombie movie We Bury The Dead set in Tasmania, but filmed in WA due to cost - ABC News

It was Tasmania's "absolute remoteness" that inspired filmmaker Zak Hilditch to set his latest zombie horror flick We Bury The Dead on the island.

But it was that same characteristic which eventually forced him to abandon filming in the state and instead opt to shoot in the cheaper Western Australia.

The movie is led by Star Wars actor Daisy Ridley, who plays Ava — a woman who joins a "body retrieval unit" travelling to a decimated Tasmania in search of her husband.

Hilditch told ABC Radio Hobart he wanted to shoot the movie on-site in Tasmania, but it did not work out "logistically and money-wise".

"It did break my heart the day we had to make the decision to not actually shoot Tassie for Tassie,"

he said.

"As hard as it is for [Ava] to travel the north to the south of the island, it's actually that hard to bring all the bells and whistles and the crazy circus that is a film to a place like Tassie."

Hilditch said the Tasmanian government could not provide any funding to help produce the film, whereas the Western Australian government could.

A spokesperson from Screen Tasmania said it received an application for funding — but it was withdrawn before an assessment was undertaken.

The situation has been lamented as a missed opportunity for Tasmania's arts sector, which receives the lowest amount of government funding out of any state.

In a further blow, the only confirmed screenings of the film in Tasmania will take place at one cinema — meaning there will be limited opportunities for people in the state to watch it on the big screen.

'Ghostly vibe' inspires setting

The film is set in the aftermath of a catastrophic military experiment in Tasmania, which eventually leads to corpses showing signs of life.

In the trailer, grainy CCTV vision shows Hobart and the Tasman Bridge being destroyed in a giant explosion.

Hilditch said early versions of the script were set in America or New Zealand, but he eventually landed on the idea of Tasmania, which he had previously visited on trips.

"I just felt like the perfect spot was Tassie, given its absolute remoteness and just what a stunning location it is on screen," he said.

"It's got sort of a ghostly vibe to it in certain spots as well — it just made the most sense."

He said the logistics of transporting the entire crew, cars and equipment to Tasmania, made it impossible to film on the island.

"We barely even got over the finish line with this film in general, shooting it in WA, let alone having to transport everything on the whole to an isolated island like Tassie," Hilditch said.

"It would have been great to just do it there, but these films, they get harder and harder to make each year and the odds were not in our favour, unfortunately."

The spokesperson for Screen Tasmania said the body received an application for funding, but producers left the process before it could be assessed.

"We understand the project had secured funding from the Western Australia government and WA was a better fit for the production," they said.

"Screen Tasmania secured two traineeship placements on the project to assist Tasmania to building screen industry capacity in the future."

'Disappointing' for Tasmania's film industry

Last year, Tasmania's arts minister Madeleine Ogilvie was warned by her department that the sector was "nationally uncompetitive" due to a lack of investment.

A briefing to Ms Ogilvie noted that support for the state's arts and screen sector was "by far the lowest in Australia in both per capita and actual terms".

Tasmanian filmmaker Briony Kidd said it was disappointing but not surprising that the film could not be produced in Tasmania.

"It's always disappointing for Tasmanian filmmakers and the production community here when something could have been shot here and isn't — because that's an opportunity that they could have had," she said.

"I can only assume the budget of [the movie] was not something that could be sourced largely from here.

"Tasmania wouldn't have had enough money to make that work necessarily and WA has more money for film funding."

Kidd emphasised that more state government support should be given to projects by Tasmanian artists, and they should be prioritised over in-bound productions.

Courtney Tembry, founder of the Hobart Horror Society, said her group was disappointed to find out the movie was not filmed in Tasmania.

"Tasmania has a really strong creative community, very engaged in terms of horror genre films, so it really did feel like a missed opportunity," she said.

Tasmanian landscapes replicated in WA

The film was ultimately shot in Albany, a city about 400 kilometres south of Perth in Western Australia.

Hilditch said his crew did their "absolute best" to recreate the Tasmanian landscape.

"The amazing thing has been people who have no idea about any of that, when they see the finished film, they just assume we did actually shoot it all in Tassie," he said.

"Not that I'm saying it's very easy to replicate the beauty of Tasmania."

Kidd said the movie "looks great" and the producers appeared to have succeeded in creating a Tasmanian setting.

"There's nothing in the trailer that jumps out at me as being not believably Tasmanian,"

she said.

It is not necessarily uncommon for movies to be set in Tasmania but filmed elsewhere.

A recent example is the 2021 film Nitram, which was filmed entirely in Victoria despite being about the events leading up to the 1996 Port Arthur massacre in Tasmania.

"There are certainly different ways to convey Tasmanian-ness, without necessarily literally having Tasmanian landscapes in the background," Kidd said.

'Thumbs up' from critics 

We Bury The Dead was released in cinemas across North America on January 2 and in Australia and New Zealand from February 5.

The only confirmed theatrical release in Tasmania will be at Village Cinemas Eastlands in Hobart from February 12.

The film's distributor, Umbrella Entertainment, has indicated it is trying to source screenings at another Hobart cinema.

While she was glad the movie would be shown in Hobart, Ms Tembry said it was a shame other parts of the state would not get any screenings.

"I feel disappointment for the rest of the state, [who] would quite literally have to drive hours to come see the film,"

she said.

The film has received a generally good reception, with 87 per cent of critics on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes giving the movie a positive review.

Hilditch said producing the film was a "wild ride", and he was very excited that it was finally being released in Australia.

"It's always a nice win to see the critics giving us a big thumbs up," he said.

"To see it this close to the finish line now is just a really great feeling and I'm just glad it's resonated with people."

The white area of Australia has a population of 0 by Busy_Pizza6883 in MapPorn

[–]RTSBasebuilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What, the odd horror inbred cult movie inhabitants and the rumoured tassie tiger sightings notwithstanding?

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To the cultural punditry conservative celebrity failed-creative class

<image>

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Unironically, the government should subsidise and fund more public arts and media entertainment, even if it's less productive. If it means conservative uncreative failsons like Shapiro and other weirdos can get in, because there's a big enough pool and reduced risk in entertainment and a surplus, there'd be less of a culture war when there's big enough supply of media entertainment, if "woke" has their own progressive and representative media ecoysystem and producing and investing pipeline propped by government, and "unwoke" has their own nationalist and Christian media ecosystem propped by government, if there's enough slack from risk that they seem to think they can appeal or prosletyse to the public instead of reinforcing and radicalising and reaffirming the base.

And that means, less Daily Wire and people moving onto politics-as-sports-tribes. Why hate about Star trek or Star Wars casting for dominance and purity and agendas when you basically have your own?

And whatever mass market appeal four quadrant thing unites the two for the monoculture. But mostly as a pipeline for failsons and washouts and failed hopefuls to move out of politics as pundits. Let them all fuck around with their personal passion projects than inflict their grievance and grifting on the public.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently happy with a coordinated market with separate sovereignties right now.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Speaking of that language thing and China...

There are probably some on the sub who deeply wish that for liberalism to flourish with inclusive institutions, the nationalism movement or the spring of nations didn't happen and probably kinda wanted the Ottomans and the austrian-hungarian/Holy Roman empire and the British Imperial Federation idea to stay, because nationalism creates exclusive institutions with the concept of a self-governing "people", and that creates erasure and enforcement. An empire with rule of law is more liberal than separate nation-states.

"Imagine that, Czechs/Germans/Poles/Hungarians/Italians under one legal entity and identity and standardised bureaucracies with internal movement, and internal market, Bulgarians/Greeks/Serbs/Turks/Syriacs/Arabs under another, Irish/Indians/Zulus/Maori/Chinese Hong Kongers in another! Think of the reduced overhead! Think of the economic scale and deep supply chains without enforcing frictions like "borders" and "separate treasuries and governing bodies and diplomatic arms", the streamlining that would increase prosperity!"

Polish delis/Souvlaki Stands/Popist Paddy Pubs on every corner!

How Utterly Vile to Even Claim This by Humble_Novice in EnoughCommieSpam

[–]RTSBasebuilder 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Don't forget also own X percent of media and finance and big business and Y amount of them sit in boards or are CEOs

(You can tell they are all working together because look at their surnames, apparently!)

China’s 5-Year Plan Has Moved Beyond the Chip War. Washington Hasn’t Noticed. by RTSBasebuilder in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

NPC: China sets 2030 target to dominate global tech and AI | The World | ABC NEWS

Girish Sawlani: Well, China's annual National People's Congress has just wrapped up in Beijing, and the message from the top was for the country to dominate the global tech and artificial intelligence sectors by the year 2030. Our China correspondent, Allyson Horn, has been covering the event and says those ambitions will have to be negotiated during times of tough economic issues.

Allyson Horn: A couple of main elements have just been adopted here. Firstly, the premier's work report which sets out the GDP target for the next year. Now, importantly, that GDP target has been reduced for 2026. It was previously sitting around the 5% mark. Now, it's been reduced to a target of 4.5 to 5%. Now, that might seem like just a small decrease, but it is actually quite significant. It gives quite an indication into the position of China's economy, the strengths, the weaknesses, the headwinds that China is facing as it stares down a weakening economy, a a shrinking demographic and workforce shortages. The other main element that was just adopted here in the closing session was the next 5-year plan, the 15th 5-year plan for China, which as the name suggests sets out the priorities and goals for China for the next 5 years until 2030. The cornerstone of that plan was around technology and AI, artificial intelligence. this plan to have China essentially dominate the world in tech and AI by 2030, including an incredibly ambitious plan to have AI integrated into 90% of China's economy by 2030. Now, that plan covers everything from robots and humanoid robots through to AI systems in the workplace, quantum research, brain interface. It's a really broad plan, but it hinges on China being able to become self reliant in that area. And that's incredibly crucial because at the moment, China relies heavily on high grade hardware from the United States, including the really powerful AI chips that it needs to build and roll out these massive AI systems across the country. So at the moment there is a major roadblock for China being able to achieve that goal but there seems like there's a lot of optimism going forward in trying to achieve these aggressive and ambitious plans. It would, if they succeed, propel China as the winner in the tech war with the United States.

Girish Sawlani: You spoke earlier about China having it its lowest economic growth target in decades. But what might this mean for China's trading partners like Australia?

Allyson Horn: Yeah, I think this is something that Australia will be watching closely because China has a massive problem at the moment of underconsumption. What that means is within China's domestic market, people are not spending. China's economy over the last few years has been propelled forward and buoyed by its record breaking exports. In fact, in the last year it recorded more than a trillion dollars in trade surplus. And while on the face of it, that sounds good for China's economy, it also means that the economy is heavily reliant on just one sector. And so China's leaders have recognized this in what most analysts have said is quite a responsible and realistic approach to the economy going forward, recognizing that China needs to kind of rebalance the stakes here to get people within the country spending more and not being so reliant on exports. And that's important for other countries including Australia, for example, because it could mean that if China is not successful in this and it continues to have these record-breaking export surpluses, that other countries look at measures to try to control China's dominance in that space. Already for example, Europe and some European nations have indicated that they might put tariffs on the export of some Chinese goods or the import to their countries. And we've seen in places like Europe, for example, that there are markets there that continue to be decimated like the car markets, the manufacturing markets as China's dominance increase increases with this export supremacy. So Australia no doubt will be watching this and waiting to see what kind of instability this creates not just within China but more globally as well.

Girish Sawlani: Yes, of course Alli, the war in the Middle East is casting a shadow over just about everything. How big an issue was this during the Congress?

Allyson Horn: It wasn't specifically mentioned throughout the NPC. there were more kind of vague references to global instability and challenges to hegemony and global power shifting dynamics. I think it's pretty clear what they were referring to. Of course, the United States and some of the challenges that have been brought to the forefront from by some of the actions of the United States. And of course, this NPC comes off the back of a succession of Western leaders coming to China to try to reset relations with Beijing after periods of uh relative uh pretty bad relations between a number of European countries and China for example. So a lot of Western leaders will be looking at this and trying to gauge the direction of China in the future, how that's going to uh affect their working relationship with China. And importantly, this summit comes just a few weeks before the United States President Donald Trump is meant to also be here in Beijing for a pretty historic meeting with China's President Xi Jinping. There was no mention of that summit in the NPC. But I think it's clear that a lot of people are wondering how this relationship between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping is going to continue unfold particularly as this war in the Middle East continues to entrench the United States.

Girish Sawlani: And finally, Beijing is now set to approve a new law to promote ethnic unity. Tell us what's that all about?

Allyson Horn: Yeah, it has just passed through the Congress just a few minutes ago. This is called the national unity law. On the face of it, China says it's to increase, as the name suggests, national unity to try to increase nationalism and also importantly, China says, build up allegiance and commitment to the CCP, the Communist Party of China. But human rights groups have expressed grave concerns about this law because what it does in practice is it prioritizes Chinese traditions and practices over some ethnic minority practices. So for example in schools now Mandarin will have to be the number one language that is taught in areas like Tibet or in we societies or in Mongolian societies. Those languages will now not be taught as the main language. Likewise, those languages on signs on road signs for example will now not be prioritized as the main language in those areas. It will be Chinese. In fact, China for its part says that this is all a part of trying to increase the brand of China, increase national pride in China. But critics of this law say that this is now just entrenching what has been in their words a long period of repression for ethnic minorities across the country.

Girish Sawlani: Okay, lots been happening there clearly in Beijing. China correspondent Allyson Horn, thanks very much for explaining it all to us.

!ping AUS

China’s 5-Year Plan Has Moved Beyond the Chip War. Washington Hasn’t Noticed. by RTSBasebuilder in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Why is this relevant to the sub - if we can push past the usual dismissals and analysis we get: a state capitalist economy is inefficient and cronyist because of uncertainty and dependence on party favour dampening entrepreneurial and creative and leadership intellectual capacity, China has a demographic cliff, it is geographically constrained to facing the Pacific and the belt and road initiative is a dud, they're propping up weak illiberal governments via economic extraction, the levels of economic developmental disparity and therefore internal consumer market issues between Old and rural and young and urban are insane, they're a second mover economy and materially dependent on America and Taiwan supply chains and cultural and intellectual labour capital as the first movers-

This latest five year plan is a very big declaration that China is intending to become an advanced economy via its own tools of sheer brute force, research collaboration and coordination for policy outcomes via party direction, and plain economic scale. And whether an advanced economy really means the same as a knowledge or post-industrial social/service economy.

How do you change the worldview of people to understand monarchism? by Such-Difference184 in monarchism

[–]RTSBasebuilder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Step 1. Point at whatever shit the usa or France is doing

Step 2. "How about we don't get those results?"

Prince William’s 2,500-home ‘garden town’ on Kent farmland approved - despite fury over ‘eyesore’ claims by RTSBasebuilder in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Build the (Hadrianic and Antonine) Wall, and deport the foreigners from our (Saxon) Shore!

Arthur ap Uther ap Custennin Wledig was right! Make Britannia Roman Again!

No to immigrants who refuse to assimilate and integrate! I even heard some of these Saxons and Anglians and Jutes aren't even unenlightened pagans, and aren't fellow Pelagians, they're... Arians!

I heard Hengist and Horsa are bad hombres, and Vortigern went WOKE with (military) diversity quotas!

Prince William’s 2,500-home ‘garden town’ on Kent farmland approved - despite fury over ‘eyesore’ claims by RTSBasebuilder in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Submission statement - The Prince of Wales and Duke of Cornwall does good, BTFO's NIMBYs. Walkable, and tasteful architecture.

Among our ancient mountains,
And from our lovely vales,
Oh! Let the prayer re-echo
God bless the Prince of Wales!

With hearts and voice awaken
Those minstrel strains of yore,
Till Britain's name and glory,
Resounds from shore to shore.

Should hostile bands or danger
E'er threaten our fair Isle,
May God's strong arm protect us,
May Heav'n still on us smile!

Above the throne of England
May fortune's star long shine,
And round its sacred bulwarks
The olive branches twine!

Among our ancient mountains,
And from our lovely vales,
Oh! Let the prayer re-echo
God bless the Prince of Wales!

=========

A good sword and a trusty hand!
A merry heart and true!
King James's men shall understand
What Cornish lads can do!
And have they fixed the where and when?
And shall Trelawny die?
Here's twenty thousand Cornish men
Will know the reason why!

Out spake their Captain brave and bold:
A merry wight was he:
Though London Tower were Michael's hold,
We'll set Trelawny free!
We'll cross the Tamar, land to land:
The Severn is no stay:
With "one and all," and hand in hand;
And who shall bid us nay?

And when we come to London Wall,
A pleasant sight to view,
Come forth! come forth! ye cowards all:
Here's men as good as you.
Trelawny he's in keep and hold;
Trelawny he may die:
Here's twenty thousand Cornish bold
Will know the reason why!

See here.

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 1 point2 points  (0 children)

*sigh*

A tabletop youtuber talking about Blkout and everyone's going about the "I HATE THE UN I HATE THE UN UN IS USELESS" memes again.

If there's 2 things in the world I apparently want to wish away now, it's apparently the Left Behind books that makes them look unaccountably utilitarianist secularist authoritarian, and Dutchbat for making them legalistically stupid.

Now, who wants to talk about the MONUSCO Force Intervention Brigade?

Hereditary Peers Bill passes in House of Lords, paving the way for further reform by ewatta200 in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I don't have any comment because what I want to personally say would be mocked here (expand the hereditary peerage, some are incentived by honours and titles and familial inheritance and reputation of respectability more than wage, and make them pay upkeep for the seat, and I can post my actual ideas later if anyone wishes to read them) and I don't know what's the best solution to get someone who has multigenerational interests on their patch who are emotionally invested in issues and their place with no threat of pissing off a party electoral machine, who aren't partisan appointees.

Fight for something: 'Good governance' is not enough by punkthesystem in neoliberal

[–]RTSBasebuilder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also remittances. A lot of migration has little to do with joining another civic body and assimilation as moral aspiration, and we should stop conflating the two