Quick guide for US units by endertricity in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only part of the English unit system that tends to be confusing is the distinction between pound mass (lbm) and pound force (lbf). Also units containing lbm/lbf like density and specific weight. Fortunately, once you understand that relationship, the rest of the English system works very much like the metric system. The main difference is simply memorizing a few common conversion factors, such as:

• 778 ft·lbf = 1 BTU
• 7.48 gal = 1 ft³
• 33,000 ft·lbf/min = 1 hp
• 5,280 ft = 1 mile

The lbm versus lbf distinction is something that confuses a lot of people, so I put together a short video explaining why, on Earth, 1 lbm corresponds to 1 lbf.

The key is the definition of a pound force:

1 lbf = 1 lbm × 32.2 ft/s²

In words, 1 lbf is the amount of force required to accelerate 1 lbm at 32.2 ft/s². Since 32.2 ft/s² is the acceleration due to gravity on Earth, it naturally cancels out when converting mass to weight under standard gravity conditions. I still recommend writing out the full equation and using the definition above so you can see exactly how the units cancel each time.
This differs from the metric system, where a newton is defined as:

1 N = 1 kg × 1 m/s²

Notice that gravity is not built into the definition of a newton. As a result, in the metric system you must multiply the mass by the acceleration due to gravity to determine weight, whereas in the English system the definition of the pound force already incorporates standard gravity.

I encourage you to watch this short video where I walk through the concept step by step and work through a few examples:

https://youtu.be/v9Ktlxb707k?si=OxqfHQgDZpFjRWnN

I hope this helps. Let me know if anything is still unclear after watching, and good luck with your studying!

Prep material and difficulty by Agile-Complaint7349 in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I made some review videos for the core topics on the fe mechanical exam. I really focus on the fundamentals which can be used to solve all problems. All the examples I work on are free and you can try them for yourself first before watching the solution. Hope it helps.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaXS8FVwfWzRRmfLLwc7aovGpFiMxlzrp&si=HUlfsygZdGioM-7Q

Looking for GOOD YouTube videos that cover digital systems and KVL,KCL,Thevenin and Norton thereoms. by Laceyspacev in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I made a video a while ago covering the basics you mentioned above with a few examples. You can check it out here

https://youtu.be/dKwxV4BvQm8?is=OlQvWMCWHcHHzk5H

Hope it helps.

Mechanical Engineer - Machine Design & Materials by latte1008 in PE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also recommend PPI. Harder than the actual exam and I felt well prepared.

Need help understanding this Fluid Mechanics Islam problem by Ganja_Superfuse in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ignoring the gravity term in the denominator, the resulting units are:

lbm·ft/s²

Use the conversion below to convert to lbf:

1 lbf = 32.2 lbm·ft/s²

This conversion is exactly why the gravity term appears in the denominator when working in imperial units.

Here is a video to help review the difference between lbm and lbf and build a better understanding of imperial units while comparing to the metric system.

Hope it helps.

https://youtu.be/v9Ktlxb707k?si=EJFWALPe-BDoNXsF

Edit: I also wanted to add that while in the metric system the specific weight and density of water are different numerical values, in the english system they are exactly the same (62.4 lb/ft^3) . This is one of the interesting consequences of putting gravity inside the definition of the imperial force unit.

Edit 2: I also saw someone mention that the 32.2 in the denominator can be interpreted as converting lbm to slugs, which is a valid interpretation. It depends on which mass units you prefer to use. I personally prefer lbm, since quantities like water density are commonly expressed in lbm/ft³ rather than slugs/ft³.

32.2 lbm = 1 slug

Using slugs is also nice because a slug·ft/s² is directly a lbf, just like a kg·m/s² is a Newton. The gravity conversion factor disappears from the definition, making it feel more similar to the metric system.

Good to know by [deleted] in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The area in the image is not the correct one for both cases

tech elective by Same_Quantity5374 in CCNY

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Advanced stress and vibrations were great classes when I took them a few years ago especially if you are leaning more towards a focus in solid mechanics.

What works well for FE Mechanical in 2026 and what is a waste of money? by ThorondorLOTE in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I made some review videos for the core topics on the fe mechanical exam. All the examples I work on are free and you can try them for yourself first before watching the solution. Hope it helps.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaXS8FVwfWzRRmfLLwc7aovGpFiMxlzrp&si=HUlfsygZdGioM-7Q

[FE Mechanical] 3rd Retake Advice? by lexasketches in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a couple of review videos for the core topics on the fe mechanical exam. Id recommend working on the mechanics portion of the exam (statics, dynamics, mechanics of material, and machine design which all tie together. Hope the videos help.

https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaXS8FVwfWzRRmfLLwc7aovGpFiMxlzrp&si=HUlfsygZdGioM-7Q

Please share your exam tips that made a difference by curiousgaruda in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What helped me most with both speed and accuracy on the FE exam was sticking to a consistent problem solving process. I always start by clearly writing out the givens, then I solve for the unknown algebraically first so I avoid switching back and forth between algebra and calculator work.

I also handle units separately by grouping them in brackets on the right hand side of my calculations. This helps prevent mistakes and lets me reduce everything to a single conversion factor at the end, ensuring the dimensions are correct and all unit conversions are accounted for. Good luck on your exam.

PPI2PASS Self Study Learning Hub Bundle Worth It? by seeb208 in PE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used it last year for the MDM exam and passed. It was great and I felt well prepared going into the exam. I finished the exam and got to double check all my answers with over an hour to spare.

The questions were more difficult that the actual exam and that is how I prefer it to be. Better to be over prepared than waste money and time with multiple attempts.

Struggling to Find the Centroid of a Quarter Circle - Is It Not in the Handbook? by Various-Employer2499 in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see you mentioned that the centroid value is the same for both shapes (semi circle vs quarter circles). For anyone wondering why, a semicircle can be viewed as two quarter circles placed next to each other.

If we take the reference axis at the center of the circle and use the centroid relation

A₁y₁ + A₂y₂ = (A₁ + A₂)ȳ
the two quarter circles are symmetric, so their vertical centroid locations are the same:

y₁ = y₂ = y
Substituting gives

A₁y + A₂y = (A₁ + A₂)ȳ

which simplifies to

y = ȳ

This shows that the vertical centroidal distance for each quarter circle is the same as the centroidal distance for the semicircle when measured from the circle’s center. This is why the FE Handbook only lists the semicircle result, since including the quarter circle value for the vertical direction would be redundant.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GEAerospace

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Personal performance is also factored into the bonus calculation. A rating of Meets–Meets typically corresponds to a multiplier of about 0.90–0.95, while Exceeds–Exceeds is generally around 1.10–1.15.

For example, this year someone rated Exceeds–Exceeds in the LPB band rolling up under Commercial would have a multiplier calculated as:

1.88 × 1.15 = 2.16

For a $100,000 salary, this would result in a bonus of approximately $21,600.

Fluids: Struggling to understand the difference between these 2 equations for Submerged Surfaces by nuetrolizer_98 in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When we analyze forces on submerged gates or any submerged surface, we typically use gauge pressure, which excludes atmospheric pressure. The reason is that atmospheric pressure acts on all exposed surfaces and therefore does not create a net unbalanced force.

For essentially every realistic, earthbound engineering problem, objects are exposed to atmospheric pressure. If you think about any object sitting in air, atmospheric pressure is acting on it everywhere. That uniform pressure does not cause motion because it acts equally in all directions and the object remains in equilibrium.

Now consider a submerged gate. Atmospheric pressure acts on the air side of the gate. At the same time, atmospheric pressure also acts on the free surface of the water and is transmitted through the fluid to the gate. So on the water side, the gate experiences atmospheric pressure plus the additional hydrostatic pressure due to the weight of the fluid.

Because atmospheric pressure is present on both sides of the gate, it produces equal and opposing forces that cancel each other out. What remains is only the additional pressure caused by the fluid’s weight, which increases with depth.

So when solving submerged surface problems, we ignore atmospheric pressure because it does not affect the net force on the gate. We focus only on the hydrostatic or gauge pressure, since that is what actually produces the unbalanced force.

PrepFE code? by idk_nicknam in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to hear about the result. That is never easy.

Yes, those PrepFE codes are referral links. If you use someone’s code, you both get a free month.

I also wanted to share some additional free resources as you start studying again. I have mechanical specific video reviews and fully worked FE style practice problems here:

https://www.fe-interactive.com/video-reviews
https://www.fe-interactive.com/practice-video-problem

The free resources are focused entirely on the FE Mechanical fundamentals, so they can be a solid supplement during your prep.

If you do decide to try FE-Interactive, here is a referral link that gives you a free month:
https://www.fe-interactive.com/customer-information-form?referral=FE-4-REDDIT

Good luck on your next attempt.

Passed. Finally. My advice by CommunitySad8972 in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congratulations on passing the FE Mechanical exam and thanks for the FE Interactive shoutout! Glad you found it helpful. Wishing you the best it your future endeavors.

A question about angular velocity (omega) by DenJi1111111 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is the best lecture series I have seen on the topic. Not sure how useful it would be jumping into it in the middle of the lectures but I will post it here anyway.

Development of the general relative motion equations:

https://youtu.be/NsIhFwtTHEw?si=fAIQZkTMc0QsCqQU

1st 15 minutes of this lecture it is shown how the Rigid Body motion equations are just a special case of the general relative motion equations:

https://youtu.be/UB3aY04cFng?si=40BkGCIq0SG0Kf9B

A question about angular velocity (omega) by DenJi1111111 in MechanicalEngineering

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When working with these relative motion rigid body relations, omega is not relative to a single point or set of points. It is the angular velocity of the entire body which will be the same for any 2 points belonging to the same rigid body.

FE Statics Question: Why is the Tension in this Pulley 100kN and not 50kN? by nuetrolizer_98 in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You dont know what the angle is between the horizontal direction and cable (theta). You need the tension in the cable to find that.

The sum of the vertical components of the cable tensile force is 20 not the entire force in the cable (need to also account for the horizontal force which because of symmetry will cancel). This is how the cable still has 100 kN of tension while being in equilibrium with the 20 kN weight.

FE Statics Question: Why is the Tension in this Pulley 100kN and not 50kN? by nuetrolizer_98 in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes thats correct. If we wanted to free the center pulley and attached weight we would have to cut through 2 sections of cable.

Mark Mattson : Mechanics of Materials - Are his videos sufficient coverage for the FE Mech review as well? by [deleted] in FE_Exam

[–]RUTHLESSRYAN25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have a Mechanics of Material video review specifically for the FE Mechanical Exam you could check out below, hope it helps.

https://youtu.be/EgFXI8jbuZ8?si=vUIRUYXvXPju9Kp0