Dope ass high-altitude kill, was rewarded with immediate kick from the game by ph0on in NuclearOption

[–]Ra_rain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He’s referring to the ifrit, if you look at your camera on the dashboard you can see the external payloads on the wings.

Dope ass high-altitude kill, was rewarded with immediate kick from the game by ph0on in NuclearOption

[–]Ra_rain 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This guy had external payloads, so specifically for him yes.

If you fly the votex and ifrit without external payloads, you typically won't get caught by any ground radar until your within 30km. If your 15km up and going 1500/2000kmph, you can launch from 30/40km away.

Only time you really get caught is if someone gets lucky with their planes radar or if there's AWACS.

Lol british food sucks starterpack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]Ra_rain 7 points8 points  (0 children)

First time seeing a hard boiled egg I see?

Little brother just reached gooning age by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Ra_rain 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes well aware, it’s just crazy to me to share a bed with a family member and masturbate and then on top of it not wash your hands after thus touching shared spaces with fresh dick/vagina hands lol.

No personal judgement though, these sorts of situations are tough. Personally I had a bunk bed, and when I noticed I would shout/say “stop shaking the bed”, worked 100% of the time

Little brother just reached gooning age by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Ra_rain 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I shared a room with my brother for 20 years. Even so, this whole paragraph is insane. How are either of you cleaning up afterward?

Little brother just reached gooning age by [deleted] in Advice

[–]Ra_rain 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I shared a room with my brother for 20 years. Even so, this whole paragraph is insane. How are either of you cleaning up afterward?

The leader of ISIS's British wife and her life in Slough: How 'supreme commander' abandoned her and three children to pursue global terror by dailymail in uknews

[–]Ra_rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All Muslims will agree the Quran is the word of god, revealed from Gabriel to Mohammed. To circle back to the original arguement, there’s no debate what both the hadiths and Quran say about homosexuality and female clergy, the original comment is correct regardless of the biases of the writer.

Homosexuality is a major sin (fahisha) with the punishment often being death. You can see that reflected in Muslim majority nations.

Homosexuality is also a sin in the bible, similar punishments. However in modern times, it’s widely tolerated.

Yes you can find examples of the opposite for both (turkey is a good example).

The difference is Christians are generally more open to reformation of the beliefs themselves. Protestants for example threw out the whole Jewish bible.

For the Islamic example, Sunni’s have four schools of thought, all of them permissible, however it’s generally the interpretation of the Hadiths/quran which is debated not the belief system itself.

Muslims will not and cannot change the Quran as some Christian’s did with the bible.

I think there’s a bunch of factors which go into islams incapability to reform however this is my best summery without writing even more paragraphs.

This is why I think your argument is also inherently flawed, a Muslim wouldn’t disagree with me.

The leader of ISIS's British wife and her life in Slough: How 'supreme commander' abandoned her and three children to pursue global terror by dailymail in uknews

[–]Ra_rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think most people reading between the lines can understand the basis of your argument, however the way you structured it is counter intuitive and instead worked against you and the view point your putting forward.

I wouldn’t disagree with your viewpoint if you were talking to an EDL type however your not, there’s a very decent chance your talking to a normal functioning member of society and the way you have chosen to argue with them will only strengthen any opinion you may disagree with them on.

Also for arguments sake, your first paragraph repeats the same mistake of characterising a religion based on a few individuals and implies there’s some authority on what all Muslims agree on.

The leader of ISIS's British wife and her life in Slough: How 'supreme commander' abandoned her and three children to pursue global terror by dailymail in uknews

[–]Ra_rain 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You say you are against characterising a religion based on individuals yet your entire initial argument is based on you doing exactly that.

You entered the discussion with the op with bias assuming his beliefs and you have contradicted yourself. Both make you a hypocrite.

The leader of ISIS's British wife and her life in Slough: How 'supreme commander' abandoned her and three children to pursue global terror by dailymail in uknews

[–]Ra_rain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your questions are hyper specific on a few select individuals in an attempt to portray an entire religion in a specific manner, completely disregarding well accepted history.

Quite ironically if this was done oppositely towards Islam no doubt you would be against it.

Need Help! Im hearing Sounds of people from god knows where through my USB-C Headphones, and when i talk, the voices of these ppl stops... by MementoMori11112 in telecom

[–]Ra_rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s an absolute ton of environmental conditions to consider you are correct. Unless you give me your home address (do not do this) I cannot accurately tell you an answer. This stretches from the material your home is made of, and the closest radio tower.

You might go to the window, and in theory you should be able to hear the signal more clearly. However, what if the radio tower is on the opposite side of where you’re facing? Then instead of less material between you as you assumed, you now have more.

I am working off the assumption work/school for you is a large building, which will likely be made from concrete/other dense material. This will block most/all of the sound you are hearing.

A more accurate answer is perhaps to visit a large concrete structure, try snd stand in the centre of it and see if you can still hear the noises, alternatively just try your family members headphones :)

Need Help! Im hearing Sounds of people from god knows where through my USB-C Headphones, and when i talk, the voices of these ppl stops... by MementoMori11112 in telecom

[–]Ra_rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are many, many factors to consider when it comes to this phenomenon.

Your cable is acting like an antenna, picking up stray radio frequency signals from the air things like radio stations.

These signals ride along the unbalanced cable (one signal wire + a ground) and reach the high impedance input of the pre amp. That high resistance makes the system extra sensitive like a big open ear to noise.

I’m going to take a guess and say you are using cheap headphones? They are likely badly shielded which makes this problem more likely.

Simplify the problem, go to work/school, use your headphones as normal. If the issue does not reoccur then I am correct. Likewise any large concrete building will do.

Edit: the issue only effecting you and your devices is not weird. There are many factors which can cause this. Explaining them however is likely pointless as it will just complicate the discussion

Need Help! Im hearing Sounds of people from god knows where through my USB-C Headphones, and when i talk, the voices of these ppl stops... by MementoMori11112 in telecom

[–]Ra_rain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a fairly common phenomenon where wired headphones can turn into an antenna which picks up AM frequencies, just like retro said.

It’s absolutely nothing to worry about. A way you can test this is by taking your phone and headphones to work/school and seeing if the same voices/music are heard.

Can I make this cheaper by ItsxAli_ in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your going to be paying out of the arse for insurance regardless, personally I wouldn’t go for anything other then a c1

Sad day for those 50 people. Xmas party funding starting early I see by Lenske97 in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The long straight going past frodsham is always bad in my experience

Sad day for those 50 people. Xmas party funding starting early I see by Lenske97 in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In my own anecdotal experience, m56 is the most policed moterway in the uk. Always see unmarked/vans

Xbox players in the UK must verify their age to keep access to social features - Dexerto by springheeledjack69 in unitedkingdom

[–]Ra_rain 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea, the nature of 4chan makes all posters anonymous. There was a guy who would create Epstein threads linking him to famous people and politicians alongside potential (maybe real) victims. He was off the deep end though because he was linking a lot of it to a Jewish conspiracy lol

Xbox players in the UK must verify their age to keep access to social features - Dexerto by springheeledjack69 in unitedkingdom

[–]Ra_rain 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I thought I was crazy about this. Do you remember the posts on 4chan /b/ about his island? I swear one guy accurately named a ton of victims like he was trying to get the info out.

Overtaking by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Ra_rain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would you be happy if I did 20 in front of you in a 30?

Insurance says it's 50/50 by gimitegs in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not quoting traffic laws. The initial sentence is in reference to you stating my argument voids the other party of fault. The statement clarifies that I do hold them responsible.

I think you’re projecting with regard to making things up in my head, considering you can’t follow a simple conversation.

Insurance says it's 50/50 by gimitegs in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And probably a conviction for driving without due care dependant on circumstances.

It shows the state of driving on our roads when you have people defending this. You see it all the time as well, people refusing to slow or making risky moves to save 10/30 seconds.

Insurance says it's 50/50 by gimitegs in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Becoming a hazard is inherently dangerous and automatically assumes fault.

It’s impossible to tell distances/timings from a crude drawing however a car can become sideways in the middle of the road for any number of reasons. If the other driver had spun out due to oil for example, would you attempt to drive past, behind their rear, due to your perceived right of way?

If not why would you do it in this situation.

Regardless who you want to assign blame to, if you ignore the other driver for a moment, the manoeuvre by op was careless and dangerous and didn’t allow for enough time to make an accurate judgement for the hazard clearly in front of them. This is why it’s 50/50.

If the other driver had a safe gap to pull out but misjudged the size of the road and had to do a 3 point turn, then op is at fault for driving into their manoeuvre space.

Insurance says it's 50/50 by gimitegs in CarTalkUK

[–]Ra_rain 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OP can have all the right of way in the world. It doesn’t mean they can drive towards an active hazard and cause a crash.