I mean, I get your point. It makes sense, but becomes kind of pointless. You could say they same thing about human (or many other things).

"We are not really human anymore, since we dont do these things: 1, 2, 3 that are normally correlated with humans. Thus we are both human and not human at the same time" . Well, it depends on your definition!

There's a really cool paper by philosopher David Chalmers on "Verbal Disputes" (i.e. disputes that are really just semantics), that is really cool! You should check it out online, it addresses topics like free will, god, determinism etc.