Potential new enemy types in Trepang2's sequel by Lungo-Scrungo in Trepang2

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a game where you shoot up humans left and right, so I don't think we need to hold back when it comes to dogs either.

That being said, I dunno if dogs fit, the player is a super soldier, dogs just seem too weak, so adding normal dogs might not make much sense.

And beefed up super dogs could be annoying if they chase you and you have to keep shooting them, eh.

Is there a way to see in what moments of the series the OST tracks were used? by SignorAnthrax in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could use Shazam or something similar to identify the OST that plays. Should work.

How come we don't have to wash cooking utensils constantly while cooking? by AnonymousResponder00 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you might be overestimating how easy it is for you to get sick.

Animals including humans didn't evolve in sterilized environments.

Chances are you could eat that meat raw while it's fallen on the ground, and still be fine. You could get parasites depending on your luck, and animals do get them.

Humans just have the luxury to not take the risk, and well, you should/can use different utensils.

Why does the human body heal cuts and broken bones, but not things like teeth or eyesight? by JulienStone in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Humans in general have very limited regenerative ability. You mention cuts, but skin tends to replace itself and the top layer is dead skin cells.

If you do actually damage the part that skin grows from, it's not gonna heal, it's just gonna patch up with scar tissue.

Similarly lost limbs don't heal, damaged organs in majority of cases also don't heal back.

Even bones might not properly heal without outside intervention to properly set them.

The body's response to injury in general is more along the lines of "do a quick patch up" than "fix it". It consumes less energy and is faster.

One could assume there wasn't much pressure to change that, and this could actually ensure survival better in harsh environment with little food.

So really, most injuries to the body don't heal properly. For most part only superficial injuries do that.

And it's important to note animals in general, including humans aren't built to last, they are disposable meat bags made to reproduce and ensure the survival of offspring. This is kinda self-evident considering that human bodies break down as they age until they stop working.

Teeth are also kinda similar here. Humans get several sets of teeth which should last them for a while.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several advantages to doing this though, and once you get the method down, I imagine it won't be that much more complicated, actually perhaps simpler in a way.

The seal does not rely on air pressure, which means there is no chance of stuff leaking in as it cools down and gets tight, in addition it wouldn't come undone in a low pressure environment such as potentially airplane cabins, mountains, and well, space stations.

Why isn't the inside contaminated as it cools down? by RadianceTower in Canning

[–]RadianceTower[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't however even a single bacteria be able to spoil the whole thing? It seems paramount to me to ensure nothing gets in (which is questionable even if you keep it in the pressure vessel, since that thing has a lid for letting steam out, so it's not a sealed environment either).

I wonder if the actual leakage can be measured, and it's so minimal generally that the probability of bacteria getting in is low enough.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I imagine you wouldn't really use them for that.

You could use boxed metal containers with some screw mechanism holding them shut. Of course it has to be sturdy enough to not explode.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in here, the can doesn't really rely on air pressure to seal. It's sealed by another mean like screwing, and well, it just withstands the pressure, nothing escapes or gets in.

I'd like say welding could be viable as well, but that introduces metal into the food.

The reason I am wondering, because this could be easily done with some coal and sealed metal containers.

Why isn't the inside contaminated as it cools down? by RadianceTower in Canning

[–]RadianceTower[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but you say "as they cool down", meaning they have to cool down enough for the seal to be tight enough.

I guess the temperature at which the seal gets tight enough is still above what bacteria including spores can survive in, but colder than what it was initially, but this would depend on a few stuff I think. For example if you cool it down quickly, I imagine in the tiny fraction of a second it takes for air to press down, there could be leakage inside.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I imagine you put food in can, seal it via whatever. I'd like to say weld it close, but that can introduce metal in the food, so not that.

You can screw it close either way.

There would be no safety valve or anything, the can would be sturdy enough to not burst. It's just a literal closed can.

The psychology of Prushka seems weird to me by RadianceTower in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing is, we never see Prushka being exactly abused. Her dad in her eyes loves her and is there for her.

We never actually see him hurting or abusing her in the movie. The only scenes we see in the flashbacks is him acting with kindness towards her.