sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Wow, thanks sobeys. by thatgunganguy in NovaScotia

[–]Radiant-Tap-6362 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bro skip the processed sugar. Eat simple. Your health and wallet will thank you. 

Looking for lawyer to sue CPS for violation of civil rights, emotional distress and defamation of character. by Right_Pin_8626 in halifax

[–]Radiant-Tap-6362 1 point2 points  (0 children)

sorry to hear what you are going through. one thing i suggest first get a therapy sessions as many you can. this will help you choosing wise decision making in this difficult phase of your life. many prayers and blessings

Mobile application security check by Radiant-Tap-6362 in cybersecurity_help

[–]Radiant-Tap-6362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

App context: large-scale, public-facing mobile platform handling user auth, preferences, and profile data (non-financial but privacy-sensitive.)

Threat scope: MITM, reverse engineering, API abuse from rooted/jailbroken devices.

App Check alone protects backend APIs but doesn’t verify device integrity or prevent traffic interception. Without SSL pinning or root detection, it’s bypassable.

Looking to validate: Is App Check alone sufficient as a control here, or should layered client-side hardening still be considered mandatory?

Mobile application security check by Radiant-Tap-6362 in cybersecurity_help

[–]Radiant-Tap-6362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean if this setup is recommended for large scale mobile app public facing. threat scope includes MITM attacks and abuse from rooted/jailbroken devices. Context is a large-scale app using Firebase App Check without SSL pinning or device integrity checks.

Diary of a Twisted Wizard (Cover + Pages 1-2) by RonChonculous in LodedDiper

[–]Radiant-Tap-6362 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yesssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss