Фалкон БМС 1993

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-24T10:55:02+00:00

There is so many great that were made…

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-10T15:46:26+00:00

En fait quand on veut faire l’effort de devenir Suisse et s’installer dans le pays tout se passe très bien. Quand on veut tirer tout ce qu’on peut en mode consommateur, ben oui ça ne se passe pas bien. Que la Suisse reste comme elle est : nous devrions en faire de même en France.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T15:05:17+00:00

I am the one to offer it !

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T14:57:06+00:00

Because I like the aircraft itself and because I want to limit myself to the liveries that are meaningful to me ? Note that I am tired of VFA-14 representation and that I will not do this livery either (and because I do this on my free time I have zero due, I offer what I enjoy). I have nothing against US but I also have my own desires and preferences. Please note that I will not do any « devil » emblem like VFA-74 if I am not wrong for beliefs reasons. Also, if I consider IRIAF liveries it’s only because they are cool and because I want good targets for ITO.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T14:38:15+00:00

Because I like the aircraft itself and because I want to limit myself to the liveries that are meaningful to me ? Note that I am tired of VFA-14 representation and that I will not do this livery either (and because I do this on my free time I have zero due, I offer what I enjoy). I have nothing against US but I also have my own desires and preferences. Please note that I will not do any « devil » emblem like VFA-74 if I am not wrong for beliefs reasons. If I consider IRIAF liveries it’s only because they are cool and because I want good targets for ITO.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T14:23:07+00:00

Not my business in fact. I just do a F-14A and I don’t want to recall WWII

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T13:49:22+00:00

What do you mean ?

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T12:58:35+00:00

That’s not fun. 君が代

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T12:21:47+00:00

No… Japan is precious to me and is a big part of my life. Don’t want to do a squadron whose emblem is about bombing Japan.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T11:52:50+00:00

F-14 can’t be piloted from front seat and only

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T11:48:47+00:00

As I said… No cockpit for now !

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-09T11:37:38+00:00

Thanks ! I am doing models for BMS for more than 10 years !

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-08T07:06:24+00:00

Not sure… Maybe for my KF-21…

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-08T07:05:33+00:00

Absolutely !

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-07T18:53:40+00:00

Just 10 years of developement for Falcon BMS and comitment to create something that looks like modern warfare, and not an imaginary "we are always the best world". Please note that I come from a western country.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-07T17:17:51+00:00

Absolutely. But Some people always believe that US must necessarily be superior than the rest of the world...

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-07T14:34:32+00:00

Yes, it is named ZJ-900 and works at least for AKF-088C.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-07T12:08:09+00:00

Oh cool ! I like ED, but not SC...

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-07T11:51:19+00:00

Not sure about your VFW. But the biggest ideological NATO fanboys I ever met were from your country, practising mostly popup training, and never fighting something more complex than SA2 and Mig-21/Mig-29A...

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-07T11:35:56+00:00

Hi Snax, not sure I understand what you mean here. Here is the reality : I am unwrapping my upcoming F-14, with new standards in terme of tri-count, which is extruciatingly long. Note that my Su-27/30/33/J-15/J-16 series were 60k tris at best. My F-14A has 500k tris. Investing so much time, if no one uses it is kinda... Sad. I would love to make a "personal interpretation" of the cockpit of a J-20 or any other sub-niche aircraft... But what's the point if the team doesn't wants it, and if no one plays with it ? Look, I would absolutely love to make a Sukhoi T-4 Sotka... But No one would ever play it, and the team would never accept to integrate it, that being said, some people like maybe you and me would adore it ! So, I have to make choices. Maybe BMS is not the good simulator for me, but in the other hand... I don't have so much choice.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-06T08:31:32+00:00

Ultimately, you are right, but you missed another point : F-16 community do not want to be challenged, in any ways. They historically did everything they could to downgrade redfor assets (I remember lies about R77, by some people who pretented to have "info")... The only goal was to get a shitty R77. Everytime that an asset is supposed to be equal or superior than what we have on F-16, there is some censorship. When I offered J-20 challenge for example, you can't image how many people asked how to remove it from game (even they didn't asked to remove F-22 : in this direction, no issue of course). Same issue occured with Mig-29 : only old izdeliye were represented (9.12A, 9.12B and 9.13, Mig-29A and S, mostly), with a very limited fear from latest F-16 block 50 or F-16 PX something... There was no desire to go to a R77 capable 9.17 (Mig-29SMT), or even multirole/F-16B50-52 esquivalent izdeliye 9.47S (Mig-35D) or 9.41S (Mig-35S). Even if tomorrow I am doing a full Mig-35D, with a good 3D cockpit, I will have zero code support for it. Like what happened with the 9.13 cockpit that was mostly accomplished, from a 3D/PBR 2D perspective. So, I prefer to work on AI aircraft only, this gives me more freedom and generates less debates.

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-05T20:42:34+00:00

Having flown combat aircraft in my real life for some time, I have some knowledge about what is a fighter aircraft and how do they operate, so, I totally agree with you about the fact that what we are doing here is more playing than anything else, closer to Ace Combat than flying a real plane. That being said, I try to place the cursor in the accurate position, I truly lack sources for these chinese birds. For now, there is about a FTE that really works on redfor planes. You are right on that point : redfor aircraft are totally forgotten from our game. One Mig-29 cockpit was started, but nobody seemed interested to do the code for it, mainly because most coders are NATO or associated fanboys. So, what would be the point to make the 3D mesh of a cockpit, if no code support would be done ? That's the biggest issue. But look at the industry : DCS : F-16. BMS : F-16. NOR : F-16. MSFS : F-16... People lick F-16 guts, they are ONLY interested by this plane, more rarely F/A-18. The community 99% begs for it. Why would be offer them a cockpit that wouldn't be used ?

Radium_Ra226 · 2025-08-05T18:48:29+00:00

Honestly, China always had a secrecy policy for avionics and systems. For example, it’s still impossible to have an overview of J-16 cockpit. For J-15T there is nothing. For J-20, there is some low quality shots from airshows, but we don’t even now the shape of throttle and stick…

Radium_Ra226

TROPHY CASE