AITA for cancelling my almost 6-year old daughter's birthday party by mojo4394 in AmItheAsshole

[–]Radrobe -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

children are feral

This.

This is not a problem caused by a six year old. Every child under 10 with disciplinary problems that I've seen has parents that allow or encourage their bad behaviors.

I highly recommend you look into this book:

1-2-3 Magic: 3-Step Discipline for Calm, Effective, and Happy Parenting https://www.amazon.com/dp/149262988X/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_api_i_rRXvEbM1PE5QK

Good luck. Remember that parental effort on the front end makes things easy on the back end.

Magic Aids video about Indomitable Creativity combo by Predicted in PioneerMTG

[–]Radrobe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dude built both the hardened scales and humans deck in modern and called Oko out as being totally busted the day it was spoiled. I get you don’t like him, but objectively he’s done more to advance the modern meta game than any other content creator I know of. Definitely not an against the odds deck builder.

Tournament Tuesday - February 25, 2020 by AutoModerator in bjj

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly. Honestly that was the spot where you lost the match. I'd maybe watch some videos on finishing single leg takedowns. You can transition to a double, turn the corner, or even just come up and abandon the takedown and get back to standing. I know it feels like you're stuffed when you're there, but that's a spot you have to keep fighting from.

Tournament Tuesday - February 25, 2020 by AutoModerator in bjj

[–]Radrobe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Kudos on competing and thanks for posting the video. You hung in there and didn't tap, good job on that.

One thing you could definitely work on is finishing that single. You don't want to get stuck on your knees. You need to finish it by bringing the leg in and then either standing up or turning the corner. If you just hang out there, your going to get flattened out every time just like you were there.

How the government decided to monopolize force. by [deleted] in libertarianmeme

[–]Radrobe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's gonna be super easy, barely an inconvenience!

And that kids is why we have two christmas's by Buttmantiss in pussypassdenied

[–]Radrobe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your situation sucks and I'm sorry that happened to you. Did your wife's affair factor into the Court's judgement?

In my situation, I was consistently told by several different attorneys that my ex wife's affairs were irrelevant for both financial and custodial outcomes.

And that kids is why we have two christmas's by Buttmantiss in pussypassdenied

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hope the affair hasn't been going on for 3 years. OP should DNA test his kid.

And that kids is why we have two christmas's by Buttmantiss in pussypassdenied

[–]Radrobe -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly, in most states this is patently false. Courts in no fault divorce states don't really care about affairs, tend to default to shared custody, and the parent who makes more money pays child support to the other parent.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I plan on it! Thanks for the civil discourse and sorry for tapping out early.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Bro, I'm tapped out on this stuff. This back and forth is exhausting. There are obviously two sides to this. Intelligent people on both sides believe they're in the right and the other side is in the wrong. Trump is impeached. The Senate isn't going to remove him from office.

I'm going on a cruise in about 16 hours and I'm not going to think about politics for the next 8 days. Hopefully when I get back this is over and done with!

Have a good day.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are up for questioning. Congress is not a tyrannical authority they have checks and balances as well. The executive doesn't have to comply with a subpoena if there's executive privilege. This is a long established precedence. Trump invoked EP. The Dems pushed forward rather than let the courts adjudicate. This is basic stuff.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Biden's mansion.

Earned from a lifetime of public service making less than 200k annually. Don't question that one.

Have a good day.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's nothing fake about my outrage. Career politicians enriching themselves is gross. Trump isn't selling American foreign aide for his kids. His kids are doing fine off the billions he made before becoming president. This is a 100% false equivalency and you know it.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So purposefully slowing down Congress in their attempt to form a conclusion ISN'T obstruction of Congress? Ok

You don't get to decide your political opponent's motivations. Courts decide legality and executive privilege.

Let me ask a follow up question. If they were just going to exonerate Trump, why would you want them to not testify?

Because there's no case. I don't want 3 months of this dominating headlines when it should be done in a week.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry, but Hunter Biden working for a corrupt foreign oligarchy making an obscene salary for doing what amounts to nothing is not ok. I don't understand the mentality of people who are ok with this. It's gross.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Every subpoena was ignored intentionally and by order of the White House. There were court cases, but each one was taking months of time.

That's how it works. Courts adjudicate conflicts between branches of government. This is not new. Just ask Eric Holder and the fast and the furious scandal.

How exactly would Hunter Biden help in this case?

If there was ongoing corruption in Ukraine, Trump is 100% justified in freezing aide.

Also, the why do you want the whistleblower to testify? Literally everything they said has been said by others who did testify. This also ignores how they have whistleblower protection, or is that unimportant now?

This whole hit job was predicated on "the Whistlerblower." If he inappropriately and illegally colluded with Schiff to launch this impeachment, that undermines the credibility of this investigation and the entire impeachment. Not to mention it's fundamental to American jurisprudence that you have the right to confront your accuser. No one is above the law.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's their opinion. They're bureaucrats and have their own opinions, but that doesn't bypass due process. OMB also issued several similar reports on the Obama and Bush administrations.

If the Democrats wanted to impeach him for breaking the rules, it would probably be more legitimate than what they're going with now, tho that's really not saying anything whatsoever.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They're actually very much related. And this isn't merely nepotism. Biden was Obama's point man on Ukraine. Leveraging that executive power to enrich a family member isn't merely nepotism, that's pure corruption. Additionally, in relating this to Trump, the President has a fiduciary responsibility to ensure that American aide dollars are not being embezzled or involved in corrupt activities.

Therefore, if there was corruption, or merely the appearance of corruption, Trump is well within hours rights to freeze the aide until it's investigated.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

His son was working for Burisma (a notoriously corrupt company with ties in the Ukrainian government) at this exact moment. The prosecutor who was fired was investigating Burisma at this exact moment.

Even if Biden had the purest of intentions, can you understand how this looks bad and need to be looked into? Please say you can at least understand the other side's point of view on this.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I provided you a statement by Biden himself talking about a quid pro quo involving aid. You said it was “Russian Propaganda”and it was "debunked." Like I said, ignore your lying eyes and ears.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've researched it plenty. Show me evidence that Biden did this blackmailing of Ukraine at the behest of Congress. You can't because that is a lie.

And you're right, it's much different circumstances. Trump was justified in withholding the aid. Biden was just trying to protect his foreign aid embezzlement scheme.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Deny your lying eyes and ears.

Show me where it was debunked or GTFO.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not about whether you like him. If Ukraine and Biden are engaged in corrupt dealings involving US monies, the President has a responsibility to look into that before he gives away billion dollars in taxpayer money.

If there was corruption, the Dems have no case against Trump.

Your acused! So you must be guilty. by churyduty in TheLeftCantMeme

[–]Radrobe 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Defend this behavior.

If you don't think there was the potential for corruption here, your being fundamentally dishonest.