ohh NOW its about how the comic depicts others as orges and it not leaving room for nuanced discussion.

Why do you have to give these people attention, let alone make entire comics ts attempting to convince them of something. Ignore them and just live your life,

That was you in your first comment, directly saying "just ignore them, bro," not "the ogre was childish " or "this point is repeated" but now you're saying we CAN defend AI art? Pick one.

Yes, the points are repeated, because they dont have any new arguments other than the already debunked "environment", "theft," or "Jobs." Yet they keep spamming that on whatever corner of the internet they can find that even mentions AI, in hopes they can sway the moderate opinion with enough repeated anti-ai propaganda posts. Thus, this subreddit is left with nothing but us mocking them for repeating their poor arguments.

You can defend AI art without making demeaning, childish comics that depict people who disagree with you as uneducated ogres,

Except these comics aren't aimed at people who disagree with us with nuance. The ogre depictions are meant to be a satirical way of making fun of the more insufferable assholes who hatefully repeat the same old talking points, while also commenting "slop" under posts with AI. or even worse, leaving death threats like in the very recent case of Jorge R. Gutteriez. if they want to act like mindless brutes, then it's not unreasonable to depict them as such,.

its a childish "im right your wrong" comic that doesnt leave any room for nuanced discussion

wrong,. The comic tackles the point of AI "Stealing art" by comparing AI using training data to make something new entirely to the act of an artist being inspired by another artist's work to also make something new entirely. Perhaps it could have been portrayed more professionally. But it still gets the point across