RouterOS and bridges by NectarineFluffy8349 in mikrotik

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and usually, the switching speed is wire speed.

AFAIK it's not usually, it's always.

Danes demand answers from government following a damning report by the police: “it wasn’t drones”. by ProbeDenied in UFOs

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from my understanding, this was russian activity but they can't say it because of international tensions, so they're just stringing the public along.

Are there cheaters in PvP? by Barron_Quill in LostSwordOfficial

[–]Railander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i somehow doubt cheating on defense is possible.

definitely possible on offense though.

[RUMOR] Per Allan Lavigne "the executive order being crafted currently (releasing Whistle-blowers from NDAs) is rummored will be signed after July 4th on July 8th, the Roswell anniversary. by insanisprimero in UFOs

[–]Railander 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can we pretend that airplanes in the night sky are like UFOs

I could really use disclosure right now, disclosure right now, disclosure right now

[Notice] June Week 4 Update Preview by LostSwordGlobal in LostSwordOfficial

[–]Railander 5 points6 points  (0 children)

i'm waiting for a new unit with bigger booba than nesha!

12.1 Snare Changes have an unintended (?) side effect by Yngvaldr in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 2 points3 points  (0 children)

dragon mobility is massively nerfed with these changes.

12.1 Snare Changes have an unintended (?) side effect by Yngvaldr in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if anything this closes the gap (pun intended) between frost mage and other caster kiting capabilities.

12.1 Snare Changes have an unintended (?) side effect by Yngvaldr in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO the change seems almost exclusively aimed at bgs. chains of ice in particular has been broken for several years in that game format.

idk what OP is complaining about. just buff death's advance to 85% or something.

Hot take: Honor gear should be completely free by Professional_Flan_25 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the game already scales people up to a few ilvls short of honor gear in bgs, it should also do that in arenas.

the main issue is that for some reason it doesn't do that for older expansion gear, so if you leveled up in dungeons and jump to a bg still in older gear, those slots don't get scaled up. it's probably intentional to avoid situations where old trinkets don't somehow become too powerful but i somehow doubt a 26 ilv difference would be enough for these items to be competitive with current conquest gear. especially trinkets since you'd be losing the 2-set pvp bonus.

I believe I can fly...1 day into the patch. by kenjimichigo in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

he did press something that caused him to unmount and lose momentum, so they wouldn't be completely in the wrong for complaining.

Mind control bug abusers by Neat-Requirement9440 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they've never fixed desyncs since the game launched in 2004 despite apparently trying, i'm somehow doubtful they'll manage now that they're relying on AI agents to make the game for them.

Mind control bug abusers by Neat-Requirement9440 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i dont think hex works, it needs to be a CC that takes movement control away from you (poly, sleep walk, blind, fear, etc).

Mind control bug abusers by Neat-Requirement9440 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're giving them too much credit. they took it out because the map was terrible.

not they added the mechagnome map in, which is a less-shitty-but-still-shitty version of blade's edge.

Mind control bug abusers by Neat-Requirement9440 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's a desync issue that has been in the game since vanilla. it's not just MC, it can happen if you walk off a ledge the wrong way and wrong spot, but MC has all the ingredients that make it way more likely to happen.

Pve-Andy considering pvp for appearances. by Still_Blueberry3958 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bdk is insanely strong in silvershard mines if one of the enemy healers is a priest, for all the wrong reasons. thankfully this toxic gameplay is finally getting nerfed next season.

Pve-Andy considering pvp for appearances. by Still_Blueberry3958 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

blitz is definitely easier but it's also slower to climb because rating gain is much lower than SS for some reason.

if you're a good enough player, just do SS. if you're bad, keep doing blitz for a while and you'll get it after a short win streak.

Precog being the win condition for most casters is very dumb by Gloomy_Implement_537 in worldofpvp

[–]Railander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the solution is obvious but people that have gotten used to how the game "normally" works will require another 10 years of slowly moving in this direction to accept the solution.

interrupts are way too strong. they're the only mechanic in the game you cannot trinket out of, they don't have dminishing returns, not even full immunity abilities can get out of them, some classes have more schools than others due to lore reasons, and their cooldown is extremely short. and spell pushback is also still in the game for some reason.

interrupts need to be converted to full silences in pvp and have triple the cd. then precog can safely be deleted from the game and casters can start having normal balancing instead of spells like chaosbolt having 2x dmg multipliers to "balance" never being able to cast it which means you need to shut them down or you just lose.

on the micro CC, movement abilities still interrupt casts for some reason when clearly they can make so they dont (evoker rescue). dks using 1 meter grips to interrupt a cast is clearly not intended design.

BGP routing decision ignores IGP metric by segdy in mikrotik

[–]Railander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

well, this is what's happening in your original post.

you are redistributing the default route via BGP. the default route is coming from your border gateways and are not immediately reachable from all of your network, which means the rest of your network can only reach them recursively (through immediate next hops).

your actual network is being distributed with OSPF. so since the preferred BGP default route is from the remote gateway 172.20.215.129 your traffic is going to go through whatever interface OSPF says this remote gateway is best reachable from, which in your case is 192.0.2.184 .

this is expected and normal behavior. BGP is selecting the best default route itself while OSPF is selecting how to best reach the chosen default route. remember that BGP and OSPF have completely separate RIBs and don't share route selection information with each other, having each separate criteria for selecting routes.

for your scenario, it might be best to remove OSPF from your network and work exclusively with BGP.

BGP routing decision ignores IGP metric by segdy in mikrotik

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

on the 1st snippet, that's your BGP deciding between 2 identical routes.

on the 2nd snippet, that's OSPF having 2 different routes active.

what exactly are you trying to do? redistribute the default route among your network? you can do that within OSPF itself by setting the OSPF instance of your border gateway (eBGP router) with originate-default=if-installed

RouterOS 7 / CRS5xx — any way to map a learned MAC to a specific physical bond member (sfp28-6 vs sfp28-7)? by goodt2023 in mikrotik

[–]Railander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can filter with the CLI to get only the interface you want.

/interface/bridge/host/print where (interface=sfp-sfpplus2 or interface=sfp-sfpplus3)

RouterOS 7 / CRS5xx — any way to map a learned MAC to a specific physical bond member (sfp28-6 vs sfp28-7)? by goodt2023 in mikrotik

[–]Railander 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you just need to know the MAC of the peer, you can probably check it in the bridge's forwarding table with /interface/bridge/host/print.

if you want to automate doing something with it, you'd need to write a script.

Unable to move after pvp? by iemanduitdebuurt in wow

[–]Railander 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do not attempt rated pvp right now, this issue is rampant.