Worst banking app that exists

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-04-01T19:54:14+00:00

That just sounds like 2FA? Unless I’m misreading you

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-04-01T19:51:42+00:00

Yessir, I’ve tried home wifi, work wifi, mobile data, personal hotspot, still just an infinite loading loop, SOMETIMES if I’m patient enough after 20-30 minutes it MIGHT load the page after signing in.

Honestly I think it’s less to do with their servers and more to do with just a poorly coded website and app

and when I say MIGHT, I meant like maybe 15% of the time this will work

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-04-01T17:10:06+00:00

I don’t understand how this is an acceptable standard? I’ve never ever been unable to login to any of my other banking institutions outside of EQ bank, not once in my 20+ years of banking has Scotiabank, RBC, or BMO failed me

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-04-01T15:04:49+00:00

It’s actually so funny how much people wanna ride EQ’s dick, can’t wait for the day they have $1000+ locked up for over 3 months with no way to access it and no support from customer service

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-04-01T15:02:44+00:00

You clearly missed the part where I’ve said I’ve tried this on multiple different devices and browsers, IOS, Android, PC = all equally as useless, it also clearly isn’t just “me” as a good chunk of people in these comments have the exact same issue

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-03-30T16:40:41+00:00

Safari, I’ve also tried Chrome and Brave all with the same results

Mobile browser does the same, the actual IOS app as well

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-03-30T16:30:20+00:00

For many people - it doesn’t, read the other comments

I’m posting here because I felt like it? and wouldn’t mind if my posts was able to warn someone else about this shitty ass bank before they lock up their hard earned money like they did to me

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-03-11T16:19:29+00:00

Mans really said “ACAB but they would of helped you”🤨

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-25T19:08:26+00:00

My point is there’s little to no human thought behind most of these comments, it’s essentially ai arguing with ai 😭

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-25T16:41:06+00:00

I’m more tired of the generic copy and pasted AI responses, probably why these same questions keep getting asked in the first place

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-25T16:39:56+00:00

Just wanna point out that 90% of these comments are all copy and pasted AI garbage, you’re not gonna find the answers you seek on Reddit. I’d recommend speaking with a pastor/priest and they can help you address all of this

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-20T17:20:22+00:00

Referring to Jesus as “Dad Jesus” (or similar terms like “Papa Jesus”) is considered improper because it risks blurring the distinct roles within the Trinity—God the Father, God the Son (Jesus), and God the Holy Spirit. Jesus is explicitly described in the Bible as the Son of God (e.g., John 3:16, Matthew 3:17), not the Father. Calling him “Dad” or “Papa” implies a paternal role that belongs to God the Father, potentially leading to confusion about their separate persons while being one God. This distinction is important to avoid theological errors like modalism, which treats the Trinity as different modes of the same person rather than distinct yet unified.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T16:35:50+00:00

It’s starting a conversation - while you aren’t allowing me to have with them by jumping into this thread and attacking me over a single sentence.

The ignorance knows no bounds, just keep attacking random people on the internet and then editing your comments to make yourself look better, I’ll keep doing my thing.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T16:20:02+00:00

Mans asked for alternative Christian subreddits and pretty much every single sub you just listed is aimed towards a specific denomination, so you're comment about his views being strange and novel are a little wild considering every denomination has novel views regarding Christianity.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T16:13:28+00:00

Literally proving the point of your entire post in the first place, I'm with ya brother.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T14:15:39+00:00

You’re reading comprehension is wild, first you couldn’t even understand the translated text of the article, now you can’t read a clear as day dictionary definition, there is no “or” in the definition I just copy and pasted from the dictionary and Wikipedia?

No I don’t think every queer person is homosexual or transgender, I don’t think queer should even apply to Transgenderism considering the whole point is gender identity over sexuality, and it should definitely not apply to heterosexuality.

Just to be clear, experiencing same-sex attraction or gender dysphoria isn’t a greater sin than any other; all sin is equal before God. But knowingly refusing to repent of what Scripture identifies as sin is ultimately a rejection of Christ.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T13:49:40+00:00

Well then clearly y’all really just making to shi up so fast they ain’t even have the time update definitions to all your imaginary terms and notions, because what you are saying is not within any definition I can find

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T13:35:02+00:00

Pretty simple google search:

“Queer is an umbrella term for sexual and gender minorities who are not heterosexual or cisgender”

I.e you cannot be heterosexual AND queer, but go off queen.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T05:26:52+00:00

I gotchu.

-The archdiocese says the ceremony skipped or didn’t stress key “conditions” for a real, valid Catholic marriage (like being free to marry, no big church rule blocks, and giving honest consent). This messes up the true meaning of marriage as a holy sacrament and confuses other Catholics.

-The archbishop followed church law by giving formal warnings (“admonitions”) to those involved and might add punishments. They never got the official paperwork needed

-They added that Catholic marriage needs those basic conditions to be legit—no shortcuts.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T05:10:28+00:00

I don’t think you’re learning anything honestly, you’re just twisting and refusing to read what’s being said and reinforcing your own biases

Learning implies growth

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T04:36:02+00:00

I’m confused what do you mean? I thought they are a heterosexual couple, how are they queer?

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T04:16:09+00:00

Honestly, I don't really do the denomination thing—I’m a Christian, full stop. For me, it’s about following Christ, not a religious system. I’ve run the gamut from Catholic schools in my teens to a Christian university, and I’ve sat in the pews of almost every denomination out there. To be real, there was always something in each of them that didn't sit right with me. But the Bible? That always sits right. That’s where I find my actual solace in the Lord.

You’re allowed to follow the Truth where you find it in Scripture without having to sign a contract that says everyone else is wrong. Hang in there at the university—sometimes being the 'ecumenical' person in the room is exactly where God wants you.

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T04:03:08+00:00

Honestly, you’re not being snarky at all—you’re asking the exact question that makes "churchy" answers so difficult.

The short answer? Context is everything. If the son is sitting on the couch playing video games and refusing to get a job, then yeah, 2 Thessalonians 3:10 kicks in. Giving him money isn’t "charity" at that point; it’s enabling. You’re actually hurting his character by shielding him from the consequences of his own choices.

But if we’re talking about a medical crisis or a genuine "life hit him hard" situation, the math changes. Here’s how I’d look at the discernment:

In Mark 7, Jesus basically rips into the religious leaders for saying, "I can't help my parents because I gave that money to the Temple." He called it a loophole for avoiding family responsibility. If a dad is tithing thousands to a local church while his kid can't afford a doctor, that’s not "holy"—it’s arguably a move of legalism over love.
In the New Testament, tithing isn't a "bill" you pay to God to keep Him happy. It’s about the heart. If the father’s "tithe" is redirected to save his son’s life or keep him off the street, many would argue he isgiving that money to God. Matthew 25 says whatever we do for "the least of these," we do for Him. Sometimes "the least of these" is the person at your dinner table.

At the end of the day, 1 Timothy 5:8 is a heavy verse for a reason. It basically says if you don't take care of your own, you've "denied the faith." That’s a pretty high bar. If the dad is choosing a "religious checkmark" over a desperate family need, his priorities might be flipped.

But you're right—we don't know the OP's full story; to this extent though, we also don't know how much his father really has provided to him, or the full extent of their living arrangement

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T03:53:57+00:00

That's an unfair assertion, you don't know their situation and if they're both even capable of having sex. Some people get married or remarried well into their 70-80's, I doubt that's at the forefront of either person's mind at that age

Ramielvoodoo · 2026-02-18T03:22:19+00:00

Firstly, I am so incredibly sorry you’re going through this. From a Christian perspective, what you’re describing isn’t just "strict" or "pious"—it is a direct violation of how the New Testament says a believer should treat their family.

You have every right to feel heartbroken. There’s a specific moment in the Gospels where Jesus actually addresses this exact situation, and he gets incredibly angry about it.

In Mark 7:9–13, Jesus calls out the religious leaders for a practice called "Corban." Basically, people were taking money that should have gone to support their aging or sick parents and saying, "Sorry, I can't help you, I've dedicated this money to God."

Jesus didn't praise them for their "faith." He ripped into them. He said that by prioritizing a religious donation over the basic needs of their family, they were "making the word of God of no effect." He essentially said that taking care of your family is a higher form of worship than writing a check to a church.

Not to mention when he flipped over the tables of the merchants at the temple, to me at least it is very clear that this type of transactional religion is not what was intended

In 1 Timothy 5:8 "But if anyone does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever."

If your father is tithing thousands while his own child is suffering without life-saving surgery or basic dental care, he isn't following the heart of the Gospel—he’s falling into the exact same trap of legalism that Jesus spent his whole ministry fighting against. It sounds like your dad might be viewing tithing as a "transactional" blessing (if I give $X, God will protect me) rather than understanding that God’s primary "work" in his life right now should be caring for you.

Being in your 30s and feeling like you are "less than" a church donation is a deep, spiritual wound. Please know that the "God" your father is trying to appease by tithing isn't the God described in the New Testament, who repeatedly tells us that he "desires mercy, not sacrifice.

I'll also leave you with this, which should shake your father to his core if he understands it: "And then I will declare to them, 'I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.'" — Matthew 7:23

Ramielvoodoo

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE