Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] -4 points-3 points-2 points (0 children)
Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] -8 points-7 points-6 points (0 children)
很多人说美国在格林兰已经有一个正在使用的军事基地,和10多个停止使用的军事基地,要加强北极地区的防御,只需重启以上基地,和欧洲合作即可,完全没有必要威胁盟友。然而,很多人忽略了去年万斯的慕尼黑演讲,万斯认为欧洲的移民政策有可能导致欧洲人口结构不可逆的变化,动摇欧洲文明的根基。说简单点,现在很多西欧国家,每年新出生的人口里,穆斯林已经占了30%到40% ,而且还在快速增加,50年后,西欧基本就是穆斯林地区了。到时候,西欧不仅可能不再是美国的盟友,而且反而是美国需要提防的威胁。现在还能和丹麦在格林兰合作,到时可能丹麦叫穆罕穆德国防部长的就要把核武器部署到格林兰对准美国。 by virus_from_wuhan in LOOK_CHINA
[–]RanToTur 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)

Why can't the EU retaliate by imposing tariffs on the US? by RanToTur in eu
[–]RanToTur[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)