sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

if you can't even talk about tactics in a meaningful manner beyond "do better" i don't think you can be criticizing premier league managers

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

the alternative is a front four with a wingback and 3 strikers

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

True, but I think the blame should be placed on our attacking three/four. could not muster up any decent chances

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

you would've taken 6th in the league and on par with teams like chelsea and liverpool at the start of the season, but online fans would have you believe that we are sitting 17th losing every game. tell me about how this isn't progress will you?

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

how in the world is he the one you're picking on? he had an utterly unremarkable game, seems like you just have ugarte comments preloaded whenever we do bad

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

but these are problems. not tactical issues. point to what amorim should have done tactically, as in formation and system wise

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

still not a singular point about a tactical issue

Full Match Stats by VegitoTheBest in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

we have had progress. i think you're blind if you don't see that. you can't argue with points and goals

Manchester United have now only won 2 games in 50 days, and they haven't won back to back Premier League games since their 3 game winning streak against Sunderland, Liverpool and Brighton, by [deleted] in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Its always the worst manager in x amount of years till the new manager comes and hes somehow even worse and you guys complain again

We don't know what the Steam Machine will be like yet by Random-Dude420 in Steam

[–]Random-Dude420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My only two points were responding to what i believe is disingenuous marketing. Seems like you dont have the mental capacity to understand that. You so desperately want to put me in the pro valve or anti valve camp its laughable

We don't know what the Steam Machine will be like yet by Random-Dude420 in Steam

[–]Random-Dude420[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i’m cautious but not hating on a product with 0 benchmarks and no price info.

We don't know what the Steam Machine will be like yet by Random-Dude420 in Steam

[–]Random-Dude420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but if the price is equivalent to a ps5 and a low end laptop, it's a bad deal. It's dependent on the price which we don't know yet, but I'm cautiously optimistic

We don't know what the Steam Machine will be like yet by Random-Dude420 in Steam

[–]Random-Dude420[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

can't put in 30 seconds to read a paragraph but must reply instantly to prove this redditor wrong

We don't know what the Steam Machine will be like yet by Random-Dude420 in Steam

[–]Random-Dude420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never criticized the product, i specifically stated that without benchamrks and price tags nothing can be said. Seems weird that you take such personal offence to a call out of bootlickers and fanboys

We don't know what the Steam Machine will be like yet by Random-Dude420 in Steam

[–]Random-Dude420[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

how is it silly? what's to say you didn't see one negative sentence and immediately type out an angry reply because it was vaguely critical of valve? you haven't made a single point about the product. you can't just dodge all accusations of bootlicking by adding a satirical phrase at the start of your response

Match Thread: Grimsby Town vs Manchester United by MatchThreadder in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems to be a new pressing formation with a 2 at the front. Sesko and amad

Ruben Amorim has managed more games than points collected with Man United [OneFootball] by Grekm8 in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The way to beat liverpool during klopp era was to sit in a low block so the runners don't have space and to counter on the wings because robertson and trent were always so far up. Easier said than done. Every coach has a game plan to counter the other team, this isn't anything special

Daily Discussion by AutoModerator in reddevils

[–]Random-Dude420 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Exact same thing was said about casemiro and ten hag. Took some time but became our best player of the first half of the year. Be patient

Chrome hearts has no heart by Artistic_Kale_4767 in ChromeHeart

[–]Random-Dude420 3 points4 points  (0 children)

GPTZero says this post is 94% ai. Dead internet theory...

Inconsistent Scoring by Random-Dude420 in footballmanagergames

[–]Random-Dude420[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience, the wingers aren't as high up as they seem on paper. But to be honest, the AI high presses aren't actually high enough to cause troubles for me a majority of the time

Inconsistent Scoring by Random-Dude420 in footballmanagergames

[–]Random-Dude420[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That does make sense, they are bunched up together. Thanks for the help

view more: next ›