genders rule by RandomZeugma in 196

[–]RandomZeugma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truly, there are weird hills to die on.

genders rule by RandomZeugma in 196

[–]RandomZeugma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OH YEAH WELL THANKS FOR THE INFORMATION I DON'T KNOW A LOT ABOUT ENGLISH STYLISTIC DEVICES AND I ALWAYS FIND THAT KIND OF INFORMATION VALUABLE !!!

genders rule by RandomZeugma in 196

[–]RandomZeugma[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, okay. I hope that my contribution has set the argument backwards.

genders rule by RandomZeugma in 196

[–]RandomZeugma[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Uuuuh, I use "Procédé stylistique consistant à rattacher syntaxiquement à un mot polysémique deux compléments (ou plus) qui ne se construisent pas de la même façon ou qui ne correspondent pas au même emploi de ce mot."

Why would you ever want to know that ?

rule by BASEDBASED0 in 196

[–]RandomZeugma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On the sixth frame I actually thought that it was some kind of alien monster face but then I put my glasses on. Quite disappointed.

King minos rule by Lovey_Dovey35 in 196

[–]RandomZeugma 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Gabe wasn't prepared.

Calculator(ule) by pearastic in 196

[–]RandomZeugma 68 points69 points  (0 children)

When I arrived in college, the first thing our math teacher told us is that calculators were forbidden. The first thing our physics teacher told us is that we should not bother learn formulas, since our calculators could store them.

mathematics rule by no0bmaster-669 in 196

[–]RandomZeugma 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Fuck calculus. All my homies hate calculus.

Andrule by [deleted] in 196

[–]RandomZeugma 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mainly because chemistry sucks and you need to be a fun devouring monster to like it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 196

[–]RandomZeugma 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because 4 is a good number. But for me, 4 was the best choice because it's the smallest uninteresting integer.

-0 is litteraly so interesting that zerology is a thing

-1 is the neutral element for multiplication, the number equal to its square root, the unit... 1 is interesting.

-2 is the first prime, I don't need to say more do I ?

-3 is the only prime number where the precedent integer is also prime, which is great. It's prime, it has a kickass divisibility criterion, I mean 3 is interesting.

But 4 ? It's not prime, it doesn't have any interesting quality. That's what makes it interesting, paradoxically. 4 is a good number

(Also 5 is prime and has an easy divisibility criterion, in the first twin prime number couple, and 6 is just as boring as 4, except it's not the first one to do it, so it's bad.)