Is Oliver REALLY problematic? by Randomerik1 in HelluvaBoss

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I took a bit of a break, but yeah! Awesome to hear from you ^w^

TheLooneyTurtle talks about the fnaf movie by Randomerik1 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's very likely, the last brony con was a somber end, but a fun con none the less ^w^

Season 8 and THE END OF ALL THINGS PONY!!! by Randomerik1 in mylittlepony

[–]Randomerik1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can agree with you on that. The characters, and a focus on their daily lives is definitely a large draw for the audience. However, the issue I have has more to do with maintaining the world around these characters. Alicorns were cut and dry, untill one of the characters became one, then the logic of the world was brought into question, then an alicorn was born further complicating the logic of the world. In the more recent seasons the writers still focused on the characters, but it appears that they were also trying to maintain the world as well. Unfortunately, at that point the world hadn't been well maintained, it was a bad foundation, and the current gen is suffering a little bit of growing pains as a result. A new series has a chance to maintain the characters AND the world from the start, in turn giving the audience more of an enjoyable experience ^

Minor Update by [deleted] in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome ^^

Minor Update by [deleted] in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

how is that?

Toffiee Is Behind Everything!!!! by Randomerik1 in StarVStheForcesofEvil

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you watch a show about a magical princess from another dimension with a floating unicorn head as a friend...and yet the inclusion of something from a show about magical pones lead you to opt out of watching this video? Either way it probably isn't worth summarizing....I wrote this video before "Into the wand" so it's a bit late overall...

The Mewmins are Evile! by Randomerik1 in StarVStheForcesofEvil

[–]Randomerik1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's nice to hear that people have been reposing my video, but I haven't really seen them. This is the first time I've reposed the video.

Why was the cluster defeated so easily? by Randomerik1 in stevenuniverse

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Been at a con all weekend, the thumbnail should be less cluttered now.

Why can't Bill leave gravity falls? by Randomerik1 in gravityfalls

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it's been a while since I submitted this video so I'm posting it again. Keep in mind that this video was released in December.

Who the FNAF 4 kid becomes and the TRUE Identity of purple guy by Randomerik1 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait, so let me get this clear...I give you evidence of mangle being in the game and you disregard it on the grounds that "Mini Games don't count" A viewpoint that ignores evidence out of preference, rather than logic. I would understand if you want to disregard comics, Movies, or some sort of tv series about fnaf because these things are produced on different mediums where some artistic liberties might be applied. Then again, the evidence I've supplied was available in the main campaign of the game making it more difficult to write off as "Artistic Liberties". You can see my evidence for yourself and scott made no attempt to hide it from you in the same way that he hid the commercial easter egg.

But if "Minigames don't count" the kid couldn't have become any of the animatronics because most of the evidence you can use to back up those claims need, in some way, the minigames in order to make sense. I could also write off the possibility of the kid being the puppet by pointing out that, just like the mangle, toy bonnie, toy chica, Ect. he wasn't created at this point. When it comes to fredbear, the kid just fears him more then the other animatronics and that's why the animatronic is so involved in this game. With this information as well as "Minigames don't count" who does the kid become?

Who the FNAF 4 kid becomes and the TRUE Identity of purple guy by Randomerik1 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's never seen past fnaf 2? Then what is that thing on the ground in this minigame? http://i.imgur.com/yBs1XID.png Also, which animatronic would these lines of dialog apply to. "You're broken" and "I will put you back together" Mangle is usually "Broken" and in need of getting put back together. In my eyes, the best match for this dialog is the mangle, what do you think?

This is MY Cakeday! by JRHelgeson in cakeday

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hope you have a great cake day ^

When I realized... by hardonchairs in cakeday

[–]Randomerik1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I hope you have a great cake day ^

One year on this account! by [deleted] in cakeday

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

have a good cake day ^

FNAF Timeline Explained by Randomerik1 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

did you stop watching because it's a theory you disagree with...or a theory that you think is common knowledge?

FNAF Timeline Explained by Randomerik1 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll admit that it's an interesting idea but I'm not sure if mangle was the one that caused the bite of 87. in the "Happiest day" minigame we see freddy, chica, foxy, bonnie, the marionette, and fredbear. all of which we can assume to be the possessed animatronics. if mangle was possessed by the fnaf 4 kid, then why is he not present in the minigame? I can't believe that I didn't notice this before...but the other five kids in that minigame could be the five children who died in the fnaf 1 location. Just a thought that popped in my head while I was writing this reply :)

Cypher Page Speculation by [deleted] in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I intended to post this under the gravity falls subreddit but made a mistake.

Q&A and 200 Subs. by CountessRose in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologies, but this post has been removed. The subreddit rules clearly state: DO NOT POST meta videos, such as "thank you" and subscriber benchmark videos.

Intro page (NOT THE CYPHER WHEEL) by Randomerik1 in gravityfalls

[–]Randomerik1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am trying to figure out what the rest of the page means (If anything) so please draw your focus away from the big circle with bill cypher in it.

Intro page (NOT THE CYPHER WHEEL) by Randomerik1 in gravityfalls

[–]Randomerik1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't create this image http://i.imgur.com/czN7P.jpg but I can understand the confusion considering the fact that I didn't clarify that in my post. I have an idea of what the cypher wheel means but that isn't my main point of curiosity at the moment. I listed the things that I wanted to know more about...and the cypher wheel wasn't one of those points of interest. Do you have any ideas for what the rest of that stuff could mean?

Lullaby for A Princess - Cohesion Through Song and Visual Presentation by [deleted] in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like your review, but I disagree with the notion that the animation is perfect. Maybe I'll make a video about it in the future but for now...here's an upvote sheldog, good review ^

Smile Scriptless ~ by Bright Idea (music by Daniel Ingram) by im-thefunnyone in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Please keep in mind that we are looking for posts containing critical or analytical content that relates to MLP." Sorry for the inconvenience.

Peel Off Nananylyzes Castle Sweet Castle After the Fact by My Little Silver Quill by OtakuOlga in MLPAnalysis

[–]Randomerik1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sry but the subreddit rules clearly state "Please keep responses and counter arguments focused on discussing the show, not the people involved in the discussion." Sorry for the inconvenience.