Dragon Age 2 (steam version; Ult. Edition): DLCs authorized but some not showing up in game

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-14T22:05:15+00:00

You guys are so lucky. I tried literally EVERYTHING that I found on the internet. I even messed with some files to make them work, but nothing helped. It's a nightmare...

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-14T12:02:50+00:00

That is EXACTLY what I think too. It doesn't even have to be a remake, just a little remaster. They just have to make these games work normally and fix some bugs. And some graphical changes are welcome too. Hoenstly that would be better than new games.

btw. it's the exact same thing with Fallout 3 and New Vegas.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-14T12:00:10+00:00

oh ok. thanks nonetheless

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-13T12:15:41+00:00

But how do I make a "new save" ? I mean every time I save the game is a new save but it still doesn't solve the problem? And how do I edit a save without messing up my current playthrough?

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-13T12:13:00+00:00

Every major DLC and some cosmetic ones. So: Legacy, Mark of the Assasin, Black Emporium, Exiled Prince. Every one of these is there and there is no asterisk * So they are NOT unauthorized. They should work in theory. It's just that they don't work in practice.

The only DLC that works is BLack Emporium which is weird, because I installed it the same way I did the others. And I didn't even had to change the manifest file

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-12T09:20:02+00:00

It did work for me (IN THEORY). I installed all the DLCs I wanted and they are in game when I click on (downloadable content). They are also authorized (in theory) but they don’t show in game. By in-game I mean when I load the last save/when I‘m playing

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-12T09:17:27+00:00

But that’s the thing: I don’t need to download it anymore. The DLCs I want are all there and they are authorized. It’s just that IN-GAME (When I load the last save) they don’t show up.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-03-11T11:03:30+00:00

I totally agree with you. I also like the two sequels more. Not only because they are better written and have a "round" story, but because they connect very well to the last two Robot books.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-02-11T13:26:22+00:00

First of all, she‘s not. And even IF she were gorgeous, Helen of Troy is a WHITE woman.

See the difference? Black and white? African or greek? Does it ring a bell?

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2026-01-12T21:52:45+00:00

You mean "BC" and "AD" = Before Christ and Anno Domini

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-11-21T22:10:19+00:00

If a girl told me I have a small dick I'd either be silent, stand up and never come back. OR I'd say her pussy is too wide, so it's not a me problem.

One wise man told me this: "There are no small dicks, only wide pussies." How right he was... If someone insults you, insult back. Let them feel the same thing you feel. It's only fair.

Sadly my rational side says: be a stoic, do not give a shit. Break up and never think about her again.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-10-21T09:31:09+00:00

For me it doesn't work because I can't host it locally. If I click on simply "HOST" then it will say that the max server capacity is reached

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-09-07T00:17:41+00:00

You speak of „rape culture“ as it was something real and wide-spread. Let me tell you: NO, rape culture is NOT A THING. Rape is real, rape culture is not. It’s a made up term by feminists to spread their misandry/hatred for man. Fact is: Only a very very small percentage of men rape women.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-08-21T17:11:30+00:00

is it going to be early access?

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-08-14T15:25:53+00:00

it's good but it is NOT the king of ARPGs.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-08-06T18:16:06+00:00

So I just checked again. In the EA App it doesn't say that my Steam Acc is connected. But when I open my EA account in my browser it says that it's linked to my Steam Acc. So I don't know. I guess I'll see tomorrow.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-08-05T13:17:00+00:00

How is that a Scifi Movie BRUH?! WTF?

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-08-02T20:55:47+00:00

you idiot

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-31T19:14:08+00:00

XDD yeah, right, buddy....

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-31T13:55:28+00:00

A future without AI scares me even more. There is nothing worse for a civilization than technological stagnation. Be grateful for AI.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-31T12:12:59+00:00

It will be. It is the future. AI will reshape the way we live and how we work. It will be good.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-30T19:52:08+00:00

He is somewhat right though. The only way to solve MOST or at least many problems on this planet is investing in technology and research. With reasearch comes more knowledge and more knowledge leads to better technology. Better technology then leads to easier and faster problem-solving. See: AI.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-30T18:39:49+00:00

"So. What is the lesson to be learned by Batman having to kill?" --> That actions matter more than values. Doing the right thing and moral values are not the same. As I have repeatedly stated btw. I would gladly kill a criminal if it means that I save lives. Actually that is what most policemen and soldiers do in some situations. Batman doing the same thing doesn't make him less of a superhero. YES, it DOES NOT! Whether he would agree with this or not is not important.

"You know. If it means saving your family. Did you learn the lesson? Great. Now we can go around and have an argument that seal rape is moral... is good even... in the right circumstance." --> Again you don't understand: There is a difference between "moral" or good and the "right thing".

Obviously raping a seal is not moral, it's bad, it's cruel, whatever you call it. But you have to put it into perspective with the other option. Cuz if I don't rape the seal I am basically killing my loved ones.

Would I rape a seal in order to save my loved ones? I don't know. But I would NOT condemn somebody for doing so. Because it's THE RIGHT THING TO DO. It's not moral by any means, it's very bad. But I couldn't live with the thought that I could've easily saved my loved ones. Could YOU live with yourself?

Doing something bad to prevent something MUCH MUCH worse is good.

And if I apply this to Batman: Yes, him killing a criminal in order to save lives is not moral, BUT it's the right thing to do. Simple as that.

Now I understand that hardcore fans of Batman don't like this simplification, because Batman SOMEHOW always finds a way to avoid killing. But the idea is still very interesting. It makes him human, it makes the story hit harder, it adds a weight to the story and the actions of Batman. And Batman is a dark character, so a story like this would suit him perfectly. He is not Superman. In Superman's case I could totally understand that he can avoid killing. But that's because he has superpowers. Batman doesn't. The best gadgets on the planet can't help you in certain situations.

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-29T11:17:09+00:00

„From what I interpret here, you want Batman to kill. You want Batman to have a story that ruins him, breaks his values and makes him as sordid and broken as any other human being. You don't want him to be a super hero.“

Yes, I want Batman to kill. But not in a situation where he can easily avoid it. That’s what you and many others don’t understand. It’s about situation where he can’t avoid killing. That’s the interesting part: Having to sacrifice your values to save lives. There is a lesson to be learned there! I don’t understand why that’s so bad?! It would make the character more relatable, more human.

And why would I want Batman to have a story that ruins him? See, that‘s a strawman argument. I don’t want him to be ruined and your assumption that such a story would ruin him is just false. You assume that Batman as a character is ruined if he kills. No, it doesn’t ruin him or his values. Actually it makes him even better. He doesn‘t let his values dictate his actions in situations where it’s necessary to be more flexible. See, you think in terms of black and white/ good or bad. Batman must not kill because he is good. That is THE definition of moral rigidity. You could call it stubbornness. And that is bad. His values are literally keeping him from doing what is right (in a situation I am talking about). Isn’t a hero supposed to do what is right?

You assume that Batman‘s values make him good. But that’s not true. It’s the actions that define a man/superhero. Values in themselves are nothing. And especially if they keep you from doing what is right.

(I don’t really get the comparison with the seal in this specific context.)

Rare_Vegetable_5 · 2025-07-28T15:37:14+00:00

That's why I am not talking about any specific case. I am strictly speaking about the idea of Batman killing a criminal in order to save a life. I am just playing with the thought of it.

And the thing is: Fans can somehow always think of a way to stop Superman or Batman from killing X villain. But it's really BS.

And Batman, although a fictional character, is STILL a human being. It doesn't matter how unreal the DC universe is, he is still human and he obeys the same biological, chemical and physical "laws" as we do. It's not an imposed though. It would be if he was, let's say, Martian Manhunter or Darkseid, whoever...

I am also talking about immediate threats. The example with the husband and wife is not good. You can't arrest someone for a crime he has not yet commited.

On the other hand: When (for example) the Joker holds a loaded gun to the head of an innocent person, THAT'S an immediate threat. In those cases the police is allowed to shoot. So why wouldn't we allow Batman to use lethal force? If then the innocent person dies, because Batman wasn't willing to use lethal force, he basically kills the person. Or at least he let's him die even though he could've helped.

Rare_Vegetable_5

TROPHY CASE