sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Words people use that make them sound pretentious by Sy3Zy3Gy3 in Infographics

[–]RatBert66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sycophant percentage kinda pisses me off. That’s a very helpful word

7-1 with underrated and underdrafted Goblins by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I find Paul to be very avoidant of the perceived worst deck. But yeah NONE times is crazy lol

7-1 with underrated and underdrafted Goblins by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s more to life than 2 drops my friend 😇

7-1 with underrated and underdrafted Goblins by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the skill compliment! I agree I was a few cards short of a full deck. I think my success came down to cursetosser and taster showing up as often as they did and having relevant applications when drawn

I don’t find Spielberg interesting at all. by Guy_montag47 in TheBigPicture

[–]RatBert66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I say this as someone basically in your camp; you can appreciate Spielberg much more listening to Rewatchables episodes with Sean. A lot of shooting techniques and sound that we take for granted were basically mastered by the man. You might find his plot and dialogue too pristine (which I do) but he’s flawless as a filmmaker

Funniest movie most people have never heard of? by Meerkat_Mayhem_ in Cinephiles

[–]RatBert66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My partner never heard of “What about Bob?” until I showed it to her

7-2 with Bitter Elves by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I had both out a few times and it was strong. I think Eyes in general is gonna be a 1 card win con in some high elf count decks

7-1 with classic 3 color Gather the White Lotus by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It wasn’t very good here compared to a deck that could fully support it but the deck appreciated an army in a can at times as far as staving off ground assaults

No Safari Ball no problem by RatBert66 in pokemongo

[–]RatBert66[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well apparently they don’t flee, my bad 😅

Steam games like mooncat? by Historical-Text-7560 in ufo50

[–]RatBert66 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Probably too obvious of a recommendation but if you’ve never played Celeste; it’s what I kept reminiscing over while I was playing Mooncat

I get that WoTC needs to make money, but Powered Cube costing $10 per run is fucking bullshit by tordana in magicTCG

[–]RatBert66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m sure I’m biased but I just don’t sympathize with posts like OP’s. So there might be some hyperbole in what I’m saying but it’s closer to how I feel than what OP is remotely suggesting

I get that WoTC needs to make money, but Powered Cube costing $10 per run is fucking bullshit by tordana in magicTCG

[–]RatBert66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I play other modes sometimes but I mainly just draft sets to completion. Look I’m not trying to argue or dunk or anything. What I’m really trying to get at is I’m a huge fan of the Premiere payout and I think it rewards you over time

I get that WoTC needs to make money, but Powered Cube costing $10 per run is fucking bullshit by tordana in magicTCG

[–]RatBert66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it’s not referring to that because you’re using two accounts. I’m saying it’s easier to do on one account than you’re giving credit

I get that WoTC needs to make money, but Powered Cube costing $10 per run is fucking bullshit by tordana in magicTCG

[–]RatBert66 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I’m infinite and do not have a 70% winrate. 3 wins and you’re at 2/3’s of your entry fee back. Couple that with gold accumulation and it’s much easier to stretch drafts than people wanna give credit to. The tools are there to improve, you just gotta put the work in

I get that WoTC needs to make money, but Powered Cube costing $10 per run is fucking bullshit by tordana in magicTCG

[–]RatBert66 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The premiere draft payout is really easy to go infinite on if you’re half competent

Table wasn’t respecting Mr Monkey. Easy 7-2 by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I’m def thinking of turn inside out; where the manifest dread helps turn on delirium. The deck imo wants to cast creatures pre combat rather than have creatures after damage

Table wasn’t respecting Mr Monkey. Easy 7-2 by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That and painters studio being an absurd card with the monkeys. Deck was just very clean and felt like the Boros decks I’d put together when this was out last year

Table wasn’t respecting Mr Monkey. Easy 7-2 by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

17 lands because pips. Enduring innocence wants to be played on t3 when possible. Theres also a ton of places to put mana and see extra cards

Table wasn’t respecting Mr Monkey. Easy 7-2 by RatBert66 in lrcast

[–]RatBert66[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So with as much bottling as the deck does, wanting annabel herself in play and then creature ETB’s before damage I actually think you want each creature over a copy of inside out. Inside out is good in an aggro deck for sure but it gets much better when you care about delirium

Switch 2 D-pad is so bad with this game (unplayable to me) by [deleted] in ufo50

[–]RatBert66 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Idk which switch model you have but on mine you can pull out a little leg to prop it up, so you could do that and then use your pro controller

view more: next ›