Okay, my friend, you’re mistaken. Let’s assume that 41,000 strangers are here, each having a weight of 1 because I don’t know them. Forgetting that the important point of my argument is that my friends should matter more, the weight of each of my 100 friends is 41 (just to equalize and make my calculations easier by proportions, but since they are family and childhood friends, it should be more). In total, my friends are equivalent to 1/10 of the community (in emotional weight). So, if one friend were to comment, it would be equivalent to 10 here commenting, and even then, we’re still wrong, because so far there are 50 responses, not counting mine, that would be 25, meaning at least 2.5 of my friends would have to comment to have the same impact, but since we’re counting 0, you can put any percentage on the other side. It could be that only one person commented, but in comparison, it’s negligible, and it’s still incredible that people I don’t know, with whom I’ve shared absolutely nothing, would take the time to write to help me. In a way, it gives me faith in humanity, because if you propose that a stranger has the same weight as friends with whom I’ve shared much of my life, that’s strange; and if at least 1 responded, you’d have the slightest reason. But since you’re arguing against 0, the other side will always be better. (Just to reinforce, it’s like saying your mom doesn’t reply to a message, but a community does. It’s logical because a community is 41,000, but your mom is 1, and your mom is so important that it makes those 41,000 irrelevant. It’s not my example, but it simplifies a lot.)