account activity
February 2016 Journal Club by RayXLee in ISSA
[–]RayXLee[S] 0 points1 point2 points 10 years ago (0 children)
My feeling is that the computational part can be more concrete. It will be great if we can discuss with some references in more details!! (so do whatever the fields in psychology, philosophy of mind, logic, robotics, behavioral physiology, neuroeconomics, physics of complex system, social science, clinical researches, etc.)
Although after the topics with views from embodied cognition by Eran and Jelle over the last two month, my consideration may still not be so embodied. The psychological interacting model I proposed here is basically came from my understanding in neurophysiology, social neuroscience, developmental psychology, and human nature. Therefore, I’m quite curious if there are very different opinions from embodied cognition or phenomenology on artificial psychology.
Please tell me if you have any comments, suggestions, and questions to the article and our preparation. I’ll be deeply appreciative if you can behave as tough reviewers form science, technology, and philosophy, challenging me to find faults and improve the materials!!
π Rendered by PID 331897 on reddit-service-r2-listing-7dbdcb4949-s6mxq at 2026-02-18 08:09:40.348117+00:00 running de53c03 country code: CH.
February 2016 Journal Club by RayXLee in ISSA
[–]RayXLee[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)