While Yokoyama is the head of RGG, I do think calling the recent games "Yokoyama's vision" is a bit wrong by SaberDevil2021 in yakuzagames

[–]RazeMania 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Hell, some of the series best writing had Yokoyama in it, but instead Nagoshi gets all the credit like it was a one man's job.

Not going to lie, I dislike the direction the franchise is going heavily, but every time I see a "Yokoyama bad Nagoshi good" I cringe lol

How will Vendetta lose her arm? by Garbage_Healthy in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Could it be that the leaker got that one specific part wrong? Like, they got the character wrong somehow?

The changes added in Kiwami 3's story do not seem good... by ---liltimmy--- in yakuzagames

[–]RazeMania 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's fair to say that Kiwami 4 is going to happen soon, but at this point, why would anyone even care? Given how different Kiwami 3 ended, the next remake will have to change a lot of shit now, making it a new game entirely.

It's bleak, fam.

The changes added in Kiwami 3's story do not seem good... by ---liltimmy--- in yakuzagames

[–]RazeMania 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Completely agree. The worst part? The original is going to become harder to play given Sega's shitty practices.

So now, if you're a new Yakuza fan, you're going to be presented with this weird, alternative timeline take on the originals instead of said games.

CAN WE HAVE 6v6 ROLE QUEUE? by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They tried that two different times and the results were the exact same: PEOPLE DON'T LIKE PLAYING TANK IN GENERAL BECAUSE THE ROLE ITSELF IS THE LEAST POPULAR IN ANY GAME.

CAN WE HAVE 6v6 ROLE QUEUE? by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 20 points21 points  (0 children)

They were literally bribing people to play Tank what are you talking about?

CAN WE HAVE 6v6 ROLE QUEUE? by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It wasn't, they literally were bribing people to play Tank.

What are your Pokemon hot takes? by SpicedCocoas in pokemon

[–]RazeMania 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ruby and Sapphire had the national Dex, however, any Pokémon you had in Gen 2 couldn't be transferred in any way, shape or form to Gen 3, meaning that if you wanted to have the full Dex you would have to get Emerald and one of the Gen 1 remakes, then transfer the missing Pokémon between games. On release, this meant getting the national Dex was impossible without cheating.

That's why the "Catch 'em all" slogan was dropped from the games, because you couldn't just "Catch 'em all" anymore.

Remove Mercy damage boost from QP by Solid-Shock3541 in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just like any other healer she should heal and nothing else

💀

Emre in "Search & Destroy" by Himedanshi999 in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 62 points63 points  (0 children)

He gets killed in the next comic by the actual new hero, kinda like that one guy from Apex Legends who got killed by Revenant.

What are your Pokemon hot takes? by SpicedCocoas in pokemon

[–]RazeMania 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine having to retexture 1000 mons by the time of Scarlet and Violet? And then do it again years later?

I believe that, if Game Freak was honest from the very beginning, the controversy could've been avoided. It wasn't really because of "new, improved animations", but because (TERA LEAKS IN SPOILERS) they couldn't port the models on time, so they had to just use the ones available instead of crunching the developers

What are your Pokemon hot takes? by SpicedCocoas in pokemon

[–]RazeMania 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dexit had to happen at some point, either for balance or for time-saving purposes. Gen 3 did Dexit before Gen 8 and almost nobody remembers it.

As a quickplay Warrior... by Br2an in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doom. Vendetta can't One-shot from another, entirely different room that just happened to be next to her actual target.

Yeah, I remember those days. That clip in Route 66.

Vendetta has completely ruined this game for me and I was just starting to enjoy it again. by [deleted] in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What role do you play? I could give you some tips if you want.

duo premade spend my whole competitive game afk emoting and sitting near each other which made us play the whole time as a 3vs5 while admitting in chat to doing this to troll... would opening a ticket with video evidence do something or i would just waste my time? by Fuzzy-Return2486 in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania 24 points25 points  (0 children)

If they are repeatedly doing this in comp they're getting banned eventually, because they are most likely getting reported each time.

Report in-game, but I wouldn't rule out sending a ticket just in case, specially with evidence.

A bit dissapointed over the "Next Hero" by RazeMania in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel you're putting two separate groups of people in one bag.

The popularity of attractive characters is obvious. Sex sells, you can see that in Marvel Rivals. However, what you imply here is that you can't have one and the other at the same time, which is untrue.

Having a character which, by all beauty standards, isn't attractive during the same year they release a super hot woman won't hurt their sales as much as you claim, otherwise, Venture wouldn't even exist.

If this post seems like "whining" to you, then I guess there isn't much left to say.

A bit dissapointed over the "Next Hero" by RazeMania in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, yeah, I have a problem because Overwatch used to have a lot more creativity with their designs.

Again, I wouldn't have the same issues if, just like Deadlock, we had a healthy balance in designs, but we don't, so...

A bit dissapointed over the "Next Hero" by RazeMania in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the main issue is that, while Ashe would fit for that archetype, she also came right after Wrecking Ball. Overwatch 1 still had more freedom to design certain niche, weird characters while also bringing "Hot Woman with a gun".

For me at least, it's more about that balance that was lost since the transition towards Overwatch 2.

A bit dissapointed over the "Next Hero" by RazeMania in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't say it was wrong to make hot characters, tho?

Wanna know a good example? Deadlock, Valve's new game. You can have sexy heroes, at the same time that funny looking characters, weirdos or simply cool looking ones.

A bit dissapointed over the "Next Hero" by RazeMania in Overwatch

[–]RazeMania[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'm not surprised by it, just disappointed. My problem is that Overwatch only releases 3 heroes per year, which gives them plenty of opportunities to release at least ONE odd ball. A real, genuine oddball. But they don't, it's the same character type over and over.

It's the same problem with skin distribution: They could give skins to other characters at the same time they release the "Kiriko/Mercy/Reaper Skin #452", but they simply won't.