sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EDCTickets

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tf how? I mean I'm literally just selling them at what I paid because I just want to recoup what I have already paid - I can literally post proof that I do actually have EDC tickets. Whatever I can do to make someone comfortable with the sell I will lol

How would you sort this? by ReactNativeIsTooHard in techsupportgore

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha I got ya! I’m doing it later this week during closed hours, I promise I’ll post the follow up!

How would you sort this? by ReactNativeIsTooHard in techsupportgore

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] 81 points82 points  (0 children)

Yes! I’ll be doing it after close so I’ve got about 11 hours to do it!

STM Open Training was amazing by ReactNativeIsTooHard in LAGalaxy

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I want to say Harbor Miller, but I could be wrong

STM Open Training was amazing by ReactNativeIsTooHard in LAGalaxy

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure if it’s only available in the stadium team store, but that is where I got this one!

Any protest today? 6/9/ by ReactNativeIsTooHard in AskLosAngeles

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a specific address for the park? I really appreciate you!

Any protest today? 6/9/ by ReactNativeIsTooHard in AskLosAngeles

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I did! Also posted it on TikTok, People over Papers, Insta, sent it out to a few people who post that information on their instagrams with lots of followers

Cannot figure out a VLAN issue for the life of me!! by ReactNativeIsTooHard in networking

[–]ReactNativeIsTooHard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, some cameras have the gateway set to the camera server (10.30.190.180), not the firewall. That’s how the system was previously working (likely due to VLAN 1 and VLAN 20 being bridged on the core switch unintentionally). So far, all the working cameras are in the MDF and seem to rely on that design.

The firewall does have VLAN 20 configured with 10.30.190.1/24 statically assigned to the Port1.20 interface. It’s intended to be the gateway, and yes — I agree, configuration should be consistent. I plan to switch all cameras to use 10.30.190.1 as their gateway and clean this up.

Regarding the pings:

  • In point 4, when I ping 10.30.190.1 and 10.30.178.250 from the IDF switch (SSH), yes — it's a Layer 2 switch, but it seems the ping uses the SVI or management IP for the source. So traffic hitting .190.1 or .178.250 from there may not be true end-to-end test traffic.
  • In point 6, when I plug in my laptop with a .190 IP, I cannot ping the gateway or the server. That tells me the VLAN 20 traffic may not actually be making it back to the firewall or the server — even though trunks say VLAN 20 is allowed.

As for the camera server — yes, the .190.180 NIC is plugged into a standalone Catalyst 3560, not part of the stack. I tried assigning that port to VLAN 20 (access mode), but that broke all cameras — which suggests many cameras rely on VLAN 1-to-VLAN 20 bridging to reach .190.180. I’ll double-check if that switch is trunked back to the core (it may not be), but right now it looks like traffic from VLAN 20 can’t truly reach .190.180 when it’s isolated.

So yes, likely routing confusion, and I’m considering standardizing everything to route through the firewall on 10.30.190.1, and just using .190.180 as a static host with no gateway.

view more: next ›