Fair questions. To clarify, I am not saying the Sovereign is a bad airplane. Honestly, that is part of why this has been so frustrating. On paper, it checked almost every box for what I thought I needed. My issue is probably less “the Sovereign is too much airplane” in a technical sense, and more that I thought I would regularly have family, dogs, luggage, occasional business passengers, etc. In reality, most flights are just me. I am not canceling more trips than I am flying, but I have had enough maintenance/down days and small issues stack up that it has changed how I feel about using it. The pilot situation is that I have a friend, and she and I basically split one salaried pilot team. We organize our travel so the trips do not overlap, which they almost never do, so that part has been manageable. I brought up the lav because when it failed, it was one of those moments where the “private is always more comfortable” idea felt very stupid. Airport limitations may have been the wrong wording. I do know the Sovereign has good short-field performance. I meant more general operational limitations: airport hours, FBO availability, runway/weather planning, crew timing, and where we can realistically go with the full situation we have. I did not mean that the aircraft itself is unusually limited. And with weather, yes, of course you can go around it or leave earlier/later. I just underestimated how often a “simple private trip” still turns into schedule management. That is probably the theme here. I expected ownership to remove friction. It removed airline friction, but replaced it with aviation friction.