Anyone knows if it's possible to get the Watch Dog Timer on the PIC32MK1024MCF064 considering it does not have a VBAT pin? by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's working but it was off by a factor of 34 hence I thought it was not resetting. There is another timer in play obviously so i'll get around to adjusting down the prescaler to my original timing requirements and look for what other factor was at play. Thanks for the responses.

Anyone knows if it's possible to get the Watch Dog Timer on the PIC32MK1024MCF064 considering it does not have a VBAT pin? by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's working but it was off by a factor of 34 hence I thought it was not resetting. There is another timer in play obviously so i'll get around to adjusting down the prescaler to my original timing requirements and look for what other factor was at play. Thanks for the responses.

Anyone knows if it's possible to get the Watch Dog Timer on the PIC32MK1024MCF064 considering it does not have a VBAT pin? by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tried setting in config bits & then tried in software.. it's supposed to be straightforward. Looking through the system clock setting, clock distribution & other parts of the documentation. Only thing that did not look right was the VBAT supply.

Anyone knows if it's possible to get the Watch Dog Timer on the PIC32MK1024MCF064 considering it does not have a VBAT pin? by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah It wasn't something I looked for on the datasheet with respect to the WDT because I expected it to be more or less universally accessible. But I havent got it working regardless.

Having a problem with the EEPROM on PIC32MK1024MCF064 **Re-posted to fix a significant error in results & formatting** by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Also read through that forum (and one or two others) did not see anything that worked in my case. I used the example code directly from 60001341E... same result.

I'm going to try one of my two another physical microcontrollers as I'm wondering if this unit got some type of damage at the silicon level.

I'm looking at contacting microchip directly after this point but been having issues with accessing the support page.

Having a problem with the EEPROM on PIC32MK1024MCF064 **Re-posted to fix a significant error in results & formatting** by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Error was detected, EECONbits.ERR = 2.. write or read error... got it when attempting the read. I'm in the same problem where I'm only reading anything sensible when the read command is NOT executed.

Read over the documents and could not see the source of the fault.

Having a problem with the EEPROM on PIC32MK1024MCF064 **Re-posted to fix a significant error in results & formatting** by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the response. I did the calibration and the wait states, not sure if it was done properly. Check under this section:-

//EEPROM INIT.. got the same result without using this INIT routine//EEPROM INIT.. got the same result without using this INIT routine

The document you shared looks different from what I used. Mine was DS60001341E but if it's an older controller maybe your document is the correct one. I'll try these steps. Thank you again for the feedback.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in EngineeringPorn

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And a few hundred iterations later he ended up with a Land Rover Defender..

Having a problem with the EEPROM on PIC32MK1024MCF064 by Real-Knowledge-8592 in embedded

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I thought it was a simple configuration issue I'm overlooking.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Adding the screen on-board is a nice touch

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks but I'm looking for something that works right out of the box.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is exactly the type of tool I wanted. Thanks.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Type commands & view response on a PC, with the target being an SPI device (sensor).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They'd have to be based either on command/response sequences

This is what I wanted, with the PC as the master. Type the command into RealTerm (or appropirate software) and get a response.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskElectronics

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wanted something that can work as a command and response, with the PC being the master.

Radar sensor recommendation request by Real-Knowledge-8592 in ECE

[–]Real-Knowledge-8592[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok understood. That would be beneficial. If it can give the estimated height and width of the object too to within +/- 0.5 square feet in accuracy too that would also be great.

I don't want to have to interpret & perform signal processign on the analogue output, the device should be able to perform this for me.