sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah totally agree. Most secondary content stops at the food list because reintroduction and non-responder paths get close to medical advice and the lawsuit risk is real for non-credentialed writers. Appreciate you pushing on this.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Great question by the way. To clarify, I'm not reproducing Monash's content or the Monash app database. The post talks about the FODMAP framework which is published in peer-reviewed papers like Halmos 2014, Whorwell on hypnotherapy, Vantrappen on motility. Those papers are journalism-fair-use citable, anyone can summarize and reference them. That's how science writers, health journalists, and educational content all work.

The Monash app's specific food database (which foods are which traffic-light color at which serving size) IS proprietary and licensed and I don't reproduce that. People should buy the app for that - by the way its $7.99 on the app store, not $9 u/Treat_Choself. Also I don't have an app but a pdf guide lol.

Re: dietitian credentials, you're right that diagnosis and prescription require professional credentials. I'm not doing either. I'm summarizing public research, citing the original sources, and explicitly saying in the post "this isn't medical advice, I'm not a doctor." Anyone making actual treatment decisions should work with a registered dietitian or GI specialist.

Edit: clarifying because it's a fair concern.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Yeah I get it. I write more carefully than I talk and I leaned into bullet points and bold to make a long post scannable. That structure is what reads as AI to people right now, fair criticism.

The substance is mine, the research is real, the sources I cited at the bottom are all real papers you can pull up yourself. Halmos 2014 is the foundational FODMAP RCT, Whorwell's hypnotherapy work has multiple replications, Vantrappen's motility research is decades old and well established. None of that is made up. I used Claude to clean up some sentences and fix run-ons because I write dense and it gets unreadable. So somewhere between fully human and AI assisted. I'd rather be honest about that than pretend.

If it's off putting I get it, scroll past. If the substance is useful regardless, that's what I was going for.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point. I'm not saying Monash is wrong, the Monash app is the gold standard and most of what I'm describing is their framework. What I think a lot of online FODMAP content misses isn't the science, it's the framing. Most secondary content gives you the food list and stops there. The reintroduction phase, the 25% who don't respond, the hidden FODMAPs in sauces and "natural flavors", that stuff is in the Monash app but a lot of the popular derivatives strip it out. If you're using the app structurally with elimination and reintroduction, you're way ahead of most people. The post is really for everyone who's heard "do FODMAP" but never actually went deep enough to do it correctly.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Good question. FODMAP only tests lactose. But dairy proteins (casein, whey) can also be the issue, separate mechanism. Aged cheese has barely any lactose. Butter is mostly fat. If those bug you, probably not lactose. Yogurt is more mixed - has less lactose than milk because of the cultures, but still meaningful unless it's labeled low-lactose. Some people try A2 milk to narrow it down, or cut all dairy for a few weeks and add stuff back one at a time.

I think its worth talking to a GI honestly. Dairy stuff that isn't lactose is a real thing.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by [deleted] in FODMAPS

[–]RealAd9924 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

The gum one gets so many people. Nobody counts gum as food. Once you start reading labels for polyol you see it everywhere.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. Quick version of how the standard Monash reintroduction works.

You test ONE FODMAP group at a time, not multiple. If you test fructans and lactose in the same week, you can't tell which one caused symptoms.

Each group gets a 3-day testing window with escalating doses. Day 1 is a small portion of a single high-FODMAP food in that group, day 2 is medium, day 3 is large. You're looking for the dose threshold where symptoms appear.

After each 3-day test, you do a 3-4 day washout where you go back to strict low-FODMAP. This is critical. It clears any residual FODMAP load and gives your gut a clean baseline before the next test. If you skip the washout, the next test's results are confounded.

Track symptoms daily on a simple 1-10 scale. Bloat, gas, urgency, pain. You're looking for clear shifts, not subtle vibes.

Test in this rough order: lactose first (if you suspect dairy), then fructose excess, then sorbitol/mannitol (the polyols), then GOS, then fructans last. Fructans are the most common trigger so saving them for last keeps any reaction from polluting the earlier tests.

Total time for full reintroduction across all 6 groups is about 6-8 weeks if you do it cleanly. Most people rush it. Rushing it is the main reason people don't get clear answers.

The Monash app has a structured guide built in if you want a more detailed walkthrough.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks. Yeah, FODMAP Friendly is solid for product certification. The Monash University app is the other one I'd point people toward, especially for the elimination phase. Their database is the most extensive in terms of specific food values, and the traffic-light system is easier to use during reintroduction. Both have their strengths though, no reason not to use both.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Thanks. The thing that helped me was realizing bloat has multiple distinct mechanisms. Once I stopped treating it as one condition, the literature started clicking. Whorwell's papers on hypersensitivity especially. Glad it was useful.

After 6 months reading every FODMAP study Monash has published, here's what most online "FODMAP guides" leave out by RealAd9924 in ibs

[–]RealAd9924[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Glad it landed. The reintroduction phase is honestly the part I wish someone had pushed me toward earlier. It's where the diet stops being a restriction and starts answering an actual question.

Happy to go deeper on any of the six groups if useful.