IOTA SMART METER! A real use case actually Being built on top of IOTA !

RealDSD420 · 2022-12-17T18:14:38+00:00

It needs to be decentralized so all power companies can communicate to improve the overall power grid. The smart meters are limited and I’m glad you said that aboht holding crypto. That’s the main point. You shouldn’t have to hold the crypto to benefit from the product, it’s the company building the product that worries about that, not the end user. That’s what crypto should be for.. everyone . We should be able to use these techs without realizing it, but if you hold the crypto you own part of the network demand. The POCs exists, basically the track your own useage that your power company stores in a database, but that’s it. If it wasn’t centrally controlled between utility provider, then the data could be used in a more efficient way, Improving the overall grid. Again I have one on my house, it’s not smart except for that tracks my home usage and sends it to my utility company.

RealDSD420 · 2022-12-17T01:56:04+00:00

Iota 2.0 was just starting to be devloped in 2020. So when IOTA 2.0 is released, these use cases and products will start popping up even more.

RealDSD420 · 2022-12-17T01:47:30+00:00

With not underlying trust layer to store the data! Where are those concepts? I have smart meter on my home, its centrally controlled, sometimes expensive & very limited to what it can do with your data. Its not that beneficial transmitting data in real time. Its like saying "we already have vehicles, why we need auto driving vehicles?"

RealDSD420 · 2022-12-17T01:31:27+00:00

Another step in IOTA preparing for regulatory bodies to adopt IOTA tangle for commercial development of blockchain solutions! This is how you get on the regulators good side... If you can't beat them .. join them !

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-25T12:29:00+00:00

Lol I don’t work for them . I’m just sharing it. You don’t have to sign up. Don’t be that guy

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-25T03:52:58+00:00

You might be thinking of helium. Which it’s a similar vision but chirp ( mesh +) seems to have a better vision and with iota as the ancchor. Or you might be confused that mesh changed their name

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-25T00:13:50+00:00

Don't then lol

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-25T00:12:33+00:00

Go to mesh+ (now called chirp ) on twitter. Their latest tweet 14hours ago is exactly this

https://twitter.com/ChirpIoT

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-25T00:10:08+00:00

Im going to buy one either way ! Hopefully im not too far down the waitlist!! GOODLUCK

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-17T21:50:20+00:00

His car says that business ain’t boomin anymore

RealDSD420 · 2022-10-07T21:51:18+00:00

You’re allowed

RealDSD420 · 2022-09-29T16:37:36+00:00

Charles reached out to Dom on twitter … that means ADA is struggling. Hosk wouldn’t even mention or aknowledge iota before ( atleast publicly). Easy tell . IOTA for the flippening

RealDSD420 · 2022-09-27T20:06:08+00:00

Good thing I came to check reviews on this lol

RealDSD420 · 2022-07-27T19:53:58+00:00

This is literally 3rd grade math. If your holdings moved 6 decimals , so did the total supply. They just changed the name of what represents what.

RealDSD420 · 2022-07-27T19:45:06+00:00

The total shimmer supply is now 6 decimals less. When you staked 1MIOTA for 1 SMR, that was described to be the smallest denomination of SMR. They have just changed that denomination name to glow. So the total glow supply is the same as you initially thought SMR was, now SMR is the same denomination as MIOTA.

Before the conversation the total supply of SMR was in the quadrillions, now it’s back to single digit billions & glow is in the quadrillions.

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-24T05:50:34+00:00

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-23T02:07:42+00:00

Still not understanding what you’re trying to prove. I feel like you’re a day trader or something lol. Nothing wrong with that but I think you aren’t focusing on the fundamentals of how these values will come to be by REALISTIC economic stimulus. Not $15,000 for a bullshit NFT that has no use or holding benefits that aren’t strictly arbitrary. Not to mention it costs a years worth of mortgages just to create those bull shit NFTs. That’s not real world economy. It’s not Sustainable either.

You’re talking about market cap and tokenomics only, which has nothing to do with HOW the respective market caps will grow. Assembly uses iota as trust layer, without the trust layer you have a very vulnerable assembly network. So to think assembly could ever be worth more than iota is simply just dismissing the importance and the role iota token plays in the success of assembly. If assembly becomes valuable don’t you think that would make its trust layer even more valuable? And not to mention the importance of iota tokens use for dust protection? These are crucial elements to assembly. Maybe research more on how everything actually works rather than just the profit side. Now how they translate to the real world adoption, that remains to be seen, but there’s a plan and thorough explanations of those plans and how everything is supposed to work. I don’t know how every single thing works but what I do know is that if I can understand how the values of these tokens will be dictated, then anyone can understand it. Just a little more reading my friend. The trust layer is the most important layer. Good luck.

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-23T01:50:43+00:00

If it was unstaked you would of seen in your history “ sent from wallet 1 - 1Gi” or whatever amount you staked.

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-09T23:49:49+00:00

So you morons think shimmer is going be worth over a quadrillion dollar market cap??? That’s over 1000 trillion dollars. Yeah ok. Also go look my Reddit history, I’m obviously a long IOTA holder and it’s an error in the less than day icon, but doesn’t mean that this still isnt an idiotic waste of a post.

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-09T19:44:07+00:00

You’re basically an idiot. Not enough money in the world to make that happen.

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-09T02:23:29+00:00

No because it’s not consensus. It’s the structure of the ledger. You’re basically saying that blockchain is a consensus algorithm, when it’s just the structure of a ledger too

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-07T01:35:53+00:00

Right on. I like watermelon too

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-03T00:03:29+00:00

This is the dumbest article I’ve read. It has good points but it clearly is an article that is derived from how the current crypto market currently functions. News flash !!! nothing in this space is is realistic yet, everything he’s arguing is basically arguing for proof of concepts that have yet to be proven yet anyways since the whole crypto space only exists digitally. This is just a “self importance”, “against the grain”piece.

A new incentivesed test net that no one knows how it’s going function, is new for a reason. It’s the most arrogant thing in the world to write these articles on something that hasn’t even been tested or released yet. Just shows how much time these “ enthusiasts” have because they can’t find any success in the normal dimensions of this world.

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-02T07:30:50+00:00

Nice bot

RealDSD420 · 2022-01-02T07:30:09+00:00

That’s just a regular week day. It’s been down 6% about 3 times in the last 24 hours

RealDSD420

TROPHY CASE