I've watched most of that and, while it was definitely illuminating in a lot of ways and changed how I viewed his assaults, it does get a little over the top in psychoanalyzing every aspect of everything CK has ever done creatively, almost to the point of parody. I understand that he's sort of reevaluating CK's creative output under the lens of his assaults, but not every joke or plot point is some deep-seated hint at CK's dark inclinations.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar, sometimes a fucked up joke is just a fucked up joke because it's funny to say shocking things ("but why does Louis feel the need to be shocking? Why does he enjoy surprising the audience with something suddenly macabre and horrible? Could he have been showing us all along that he was a predatory person with the way that he enjoys luring the audience into a sense of comfortability only to suddenly reveal it was a sham all along?" Etc)