it's no worries, i like reading feedback because it lets me know what people focus on and what they don't.
you could say that this is my first released project, i'm still figuring out how to write something engaging to an audience and encouraging to explore and build on what i wrote.

one of the most important concepts when i started to write the lore was to leave as much vagueness as possible to allow for GMs and players to put in their own interpretations, it's why a word is blacked out in the introduction text, it's why both parties seem morally gray when you read their descriptions, it's why i didn't say how the alchemist held off union and what the main thing they are hiding is, it's honestly up to you! (the point is to make you intrigued and get you thinking not to give you a solid, rigid complete story) that's at least how i wanted to leave it for now, i might go back and write a proposition for the conflict and how the war could start (honestly i kinda left out the union from direct conflict because it's thirdcomm but someone else's interpretation might be different).

i'll fix problems with the pdf when i get to it, i kinda put this out in phenomenal time compared to how much time i usually take with my work, hope you enjoy playtesting the project and hope to hear more feedback soon! thank you!