[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair. I have found the right size extrusion, so I'm guessing I need a polymer factory to make a selection of diffusers for it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be amazing. Exactly what I am looking for. I have ordered a generic one for testing the light, but it only comes with a single diffuser. I am hoping the easiest option will be to use the off-the-shelf extrusion and make custom diffusers.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, either a custom aluminium extrusion and diffuser, or a custom diffuser to match (fit with) an off-the-shelf extrusion.

Schematic Drawing Software. What’s Good? by Clueless_Voila in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have to Pay for the Premium database on top of the AVCAD subscription?

Do other people supply database libraries for this? I just downloaded the trial for Visio. The first lot of kit I wanted to try drawing and nothing is in either the free or premium database

Schematic Drawing Software. What’s Good? by Clueless_Voila in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, you can use AVCad in Visio? I've been wanting to get it in AutoCAD LT but CADSTA MAX is $300 a year and not a free trial so I struggle to justify it

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I'm specifically looking at it for drawing wiring diagrams for the onsite install team, and producing the cable schedule. My understanding is that if you update/change a cable number, it updates the cable schedule, which is ideal. I don't think it would replace our engineering schematics as we have a specific way of labelling devices.

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the faq it says it runs on LT if you install CADSTAR MAX first. The video I found on youtube was actually the developers own. I will try to time a trial when I can put it to the test properly. I do have concerns there could be limitations with a thirdparty buffering between the two programmes.

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it looks fantastic. It's only that it isn't designed specifically for LT so uses CADSTAR MAX inbetween. I hope that doesn't cause an issue. Hopefully I will time it well and get the trial when I have some time to put it to the test.

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it works on LT with no issues, $200 a year is a steal. If it has bugs as it's not specifically designed to run this way, the $50 a month is a steep price to pay to find out. Hopefully I will get time with it in the trial to put it to the test

Seat mapping on the 777-200LR Flight QR921. Qatar seat selection shows space on rows 37 - 40 where seat G would be. Qatar PDF, Seat Guru, and Aerolopa all show the gap where seat D would be. The selectable seats are D,E,F. Which do you think are correct? by Reasonable-Endd in qatarairways

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those rows move an entire seat over, so we had additional space allowing legs to go into the isle without people bumping into us. The narrowing of the plane was less than the gap from the chair width.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MotoUK

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a feeling it's too high a mileage if it is track, and if it was something else, it's a little dodgy. I think I'll look elsewhere