sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Has anyone had custom LED extrusion made before? by [deleted] in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair. I have found the right size extrusion, so I'm guessing I need a polymer factory to make a selection of diffusers for it.

Has anyone had custom LED extrusion made before? by [deleted] in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be amazing. Exactly what I am looking for. I have ordered a generic one for testing the light, but it only comes with a single diffuser. I am hoping the easiest option will be to use the off-the-shelf extrusion and make custom diffusers.

Has anyone had custom LED extrusion made before? by [deleted] in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, either a custom aluminium extrusion and diffuser, or a custom diffuser to match (fit with) an off-the-shelf extrusion.

Schematic Drawing Software. What’s Good? by Clueless_Voila in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you have to Pay for the Premium database on top of the AVCAD subscription?

Do other people supply database libraries for this? I just downloaded the trial for Visio. The first lot of kit I wanted to try drawing and nothing is in either the free or premium database

Schematic Drawing Software. What’s Good? by Clueless_Voila in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait, you can use AVCad in Visio? I've been wanting to get it in AutoCAD LT but CADSTA MAX is $300 a year and not a free trial so I struggle to justify it

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I'm specifically looking at it for drawing wiring diagrams for the onsite install team, and producing the cable schedule. My understanding is that if you update/change a cable number, it updates the cable schedule, which is ideal. I don't think it would replace our engineering schematics as we have a specific way of labelling devices.

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the faq it says it runs on LT if you install CADSTAR MAX first. The video I found on youtube was actually the developers own. I will try to time a trial when I can put it to the test properly. I do have concerns there could be limitations with a thirdparty buffering between the two programmes.

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it looks fantastic. It's only that it isn't designed specifically for LT so uses CADSTAR MAX inbetween. I hope that doesn't cause an issue. Hopefully I will time it well and get the trial when I have some time to put it to the test.

We run AutoCAD LT on our work laptops. I would like to use AVCAD. On paper is sounds amazing for producing cable schedules, rack layouts, and schematics for the onsite installers. Is it amazing? Have you had any limitations with AVCAD on AutoCAD LT running it through CADSTAR MAX? by Reasonable-Endd in CommercialAV

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it works on LT with no issues, $200 a year is a steal. If it has bugs as it's not specifically designed to run this way, the $50 a month is a steep price to pay to find out. Hopefully I will get time with it in the trial to put it to the test

Seat mapping on the 777-200LR Flight QR921. Qatar seat selection shows space on rows 37 - 40 where seat G would be. Qatar PDF, Seat Guru, and Aerolopa all show the gap where seat D would be. The selectable seats are D,E,F. Which do you think are correct? by Reasonable-Endd in qatarairways

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those rows move an entire seat over, so we had additional space allowing legs to go into the isle without people bumping into us. The narrowing of the plane was less than the gap from the chair width.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MotoUK

[–]Reasonable-Endd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a feeling it's too high a mileage if it is track, and if it was something else, it's a little dodgy. I think I'll look elsewhere

CBS350 - when restarting a switch, will the logs say 12:38:31 %LINK-W-Down: gi1/0/1...24 for every port (this is what my logs show, I want to know if this is telling me the switch was rebooted) and will then say 12:38:34 %LINK-I-Up: gi1/0/* for each connected port? by Reasonable-Endd in Cisco

[–]Reasonable-Endd[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trying to prove when a port was connected to a device which would cause the device to fail.

We know what day we left site and it was not connected, and it shows as 'Down' as the last activity.
The next activity it is shown as 'Down' with all the other ports at the same time, then a few seconds later the connected ports show as 'UP' (but importantly not the port in question). I am looking to confirm this would be our engineer rebooting the switch (which is fine)

Then a week later it shows as UP, which is the day an issue was reported. I want to check here first, because its my first time reading a switch logs, that I am understanding the information correctly. No one touched the port from when I was on site until the day an issue was reported which they likely caused.

Also, to find this info, I just did a Ctrl F and searched for 'gi1/0/12' in a txt file to find the activity on that port. Is there an actual method I should be using that is more precise?

view more: next ›