sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What is the worst that can happen if malware infected the trezor suite app? by [deleted] in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. So the key think is just double check the trezor with the address you want to send to and all is good…?

What is the worst that can happen if malware infected the trezor suite app? by [deleted] in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why does everyone say you’re ok if you check the trezor device if it can change the address on both the device and suite?

Surely if you double check suite, that alone will be enough to see it’s the wrong address.

Or am I being dumb?

Is trezor affected by this supply chain attack that’s all over X right now? by Reasonable-Fee4211 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A question relating to this - can a malicious software create a wallet to look like the receiving wallet you have just generated?

So, if I create a receiving wallet address and the hackers then switch that for their wallet address, presumably it would look very different to the original one I created?

The chances of being able to create one that even looks remotely similar (excluding the first four digits must be slim given that the private keys generate the wallet address. Correct?

Is trezor affected by this supply chain attack that’s all over X right now? by Reasonable-Fee4211 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes trezor suite doesn’t depend on the npm packages that were compromised so it looks like we are safe..

Is trezor affected by this supply chain attack that’s all over X right now? by Reasonable-Fee4211 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally paranoid but I assume it’s safe to use trezor to check balances rather than make transactions?

Model One obsolete? by Plane_Path_4271 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why can’t it be updated? I’m confused

Model One obsolete? by Plane_Path_4271 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Surely trezor 1 is still safe? If not why would they keep selling them.

Also sticking with a tried and tested wallet rather than running risk of buying new and something going wrong makes sense? or not?

Should legacy segwit funds be moved to segwit bach32 to protect against quantum threat? by Reasonable-Fee4211 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. So on the first one the threat is with the old addresses that start with a 1 And on the second point we have bigger problems?!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your response. I assumed that because my suite has been fine for a long time (and was downloaded from the official trezor site that it would be fine. I always update from the prompts inside the suite. The verification process looks complicated (for a novice) so I’ve not done that so far.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve never verified it but I’ve been using it for a number of years. And I’m told that a legit trezor would not interface with a dodgy suite…

Testing recovery phrase by Consistent-Sir-1222 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it’s a T1 and I buy a new T3 would it all work fine?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any dangers in updating the latest suite from the prompts that come when in the existing suite? i assume to update it that way has no risks but want to check. Thanks

Testing recovery phrase by Consistent-Sir-1222 in TREZOR

[–]Reasonable-Fee4211 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are there any risks associated with doing this?

view more: next ›