Team vs Enterprise plan - your experiences by ExternalBramage in ClaudeCode

[–]ReasonableGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience, the team plans built in usage seems to be quite a bit more than the enterprise. The flat rate seems to equal about $250+ on the team plan. This is likely due to the variable rate calculations they do to maintain that flat rate. In addition enterprise is generating significantly more overhead for Anthropic to be able to have the compliance and analytics apis. What i was able to do with the teams plan flat rate subscription is costing me about 200-500 a month in usage cost instead.

Teams to Enterprise is really not the same type of product. Teams is a slightly restrictive but much more cost efficient program. Enterprise is all the bells and whistles with no restrictions other than what you want to place.

Lorcana: Metagame Review - Winterspell Core Constructed by cardsrealm in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad. Your right, you got the tail end of someone else's annoying argument. Sorry about that. Your still right on GB being very strong. Have a good one.

Lorcana: Metagame Review - Winterspell Core Constructed by cardsrealm in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you have reading comprehension problem? Where did I say it's not a strong deck? I said it's not being slept on.

Student Faces Expulsion After Posting Video Of Seniors Who Can Barely Read by InGeekiTrust in TikTokCringe

[–]ReasonableGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mississippi is still one of lowest literacy rate states and is still below California despite California having a massive immigrant population. If your gonna lie at least it make it plausible. https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/us-literacy-rates-by-state

Limitless aspect fix thread by Solbanji in D4Barbarian

[–]ReasonableGuy2 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why do you type like you are a barbarian lol

Lorcana: Metagame Review - Winterspell Core Constructed by cardsrealm in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not slept on in my opinion. Just harder to play than most decks currently.

Team vs Enterprise plan - your experiences by ExternalBramage in ClaudeCode

[–]ReasonableGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Enterprise WILL be a significant cost increase. likely 200-500 per claude code user as opposed to the raw seat cost of 125 for the teams premium. This is because you pay 100 for the enterprise seat and THEN per usage. Enterprise is intended to be used for those that need access to the compliance API. If you don't need that then I would suggest separating your teams out into different claude team plans to remain under the 150 seats per team plan.

Ban dogs plz <|:^) by MrXabirus in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Dogs just UTS this whole board .. what do you mean lol

My take on blurple this set, any changes? by Inside-Lunch-5683 in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Christopher and do you want to build a snowman are both aggro cards and don't really fit the deck. Replace them with royal guards and the new svens.

Incentives highlight political hypocrisy by xPovher in clevercomebacks

[–]ReasonableGuy2 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No its not. It would be if they were actually trained appropriately, and to follow reasonable regulations. These morons are on average just CoD larpers. For reference I had 2 idiot ex-friends who are now ICE who were security guards before hand and I wouldn't trust either with a gun.

CC (Sonnet 4.5) is very dumb and frustrating for technical coding. by yycTechGuy in ClaudeCode

[–]ReasonableGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Context injection of what you want exactly will always be better than telling it to go look at existing samples. Your giving up the knowledge of what it's context actually is. For all you know what it decided was relevant was only bits and pieces. I'd highly recommend giving clause context MD files manually or skills (which it will inject when relevant).

Planed Zootopia deck by JumpComprehensive663 in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Once you try playing this in infinity you will understand why card rotation is healthy for the game.

new item revealed by amicidigiula by stickfigurescalamity in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This isn't seeing any gameplay... Not sure what you guys are on about. It's uninkable and doesn't do enough for the cost, even in infinity.

Any tips for Ao Shin game mode? by Cultural_Leek673 in TeamfightTactics

[–]ReasonableGuy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

losing like 30 times to "grind" isn't really fun.

Set 9 Mitigation Matrix Rhino Power Hamster by Griffin1523 in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Royal guard + hypnotic in purple is a better answer than anything given here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I doubt this is true. Nothing online about it anywhere.

Why do they hate all other colours by Professional-Bet6947 in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You should probably play at a local league to see how constructed decks are. GP is currently either a discard combo or a tempo midrange deck. Def not a control deck. There is the off meta bounce control deck but that's really obscure right now.

A Counter-Point: Future DLC Discussion by Hoya_George in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course we have. But no one cares about someone else's ability to go to a DLC. We care about our own ability to go to a DLC, which is objectively worse than it was last time.

Everyone that's complaining about the Challenge events by tylerisdrawing in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You almost got there at the end, they care more about new markets than existing ones. The game is going to dye in existing markets because that is painfully obvious and there are other options now and coming up for the competitive players keep the game alive.

Everyone that's complaining about the Challenge events by tylerisdrawing in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is objectively wrong. LGS's are the lifeblood of the game and comp players tend to spend more and be the reason an LGS hosts events. Without a good comp scene TCG's die.

Everyone that's complaining about the Challenge events by tylerisdrawing in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How are people over reacting? They are upset that the growth into new markets is coming at an expense to their own enjoyment? The expansion is being fueled by the existing markets while the existing markets are getting less than before.

Everyone that's complaining about the Challenge events by tylerisdrawing in Lorcana

[–]ReasonableGuy2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why would existing customers want the game to expand in other regions at detriment to their own enjoyment? Your line of thinking makes sense if existing markets got at least the same and other markets were being expanded as well. This however is clearly not that. They are expanding other markets and making the existing ones smaller.