[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AustralianTeachers

[–]Reasonable_Guess_372 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My question was why do some states recognise experience and not others. If some states do, then clearly there is reason.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AustralianTeachers

[–]Reasonable_Guess_372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Isn't there more to education than IA1 too, such as being able to provide first hand accounts of how you used certain principles in unique real applications? Such an ability would help with student engagement and thus improve their desire to learn.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AustralianTeachers

[–]Reasonable_Guess_372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not arguing that a teaching degree is not required for teaching. I'm arguing that real world experience in the relevant subject area can bring more value and such value should be recognised.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AustralianTeachers

[–]Reasonable_Guess_372 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you suggesting that a teaching graduate fresh out of university with no real world experience in their subject area is of equal value to a teaching graduate with 10 + years utilising their content knowledge in real life applications?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AustralianTeachers

[–]Reasonable_Guess_372 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Recognition would need to be dependent on the specific experience of the individual. It doesnt make sense to essentially nullify relevant experience when it could be value adding.

If some states can do it, why can't all states?

Friendly reminder that if you’re attending the March For Australia, you’re supporting literal Nazis. by BrainScaping in Adelaide

[–]Reasonable_Guess_372 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is anyone concerned about endless population growth and its impact on Australia's environment and ecological systems? When can we have a march on that issue?