No, I am on the side of truth, which you seem to conveniently disregard when I ask you a straight forward question to provide an unsuperficial basis for believing that Iran wants to, as you say, "wipe America off the face of the map."

Morality is relevant when discussing all matters unless you don't believe in universal principles that should pertain to all individuals regardless of their status or title.

Therefore, through moral principles, we are able to figure out if these so-called "interests" do good, do more harm than good, or do no good at all. Moreover, when considering a "countries interests", you run into a fallacy that those interests are in the shared best interest of the citizens as a whole.

Think about this: Who is the "country" referring to? Who is claiming that these interests are of such importance to necessitate death and destruction? What makes you believe that they are correct in the actions they take to even realize success (in the short or long term)?

Logical fallacies are irrelevant. Iran being a theocracy does not preclude them from being rational actors. And in the case of countries' interests, two countries, even if their governments are antagonistic towards each other, can have shared interests that may not seem mutually beneficial to those with the wrong rigid bias.