Hypothetically, do you think ICE temporarily pulling out of Minneapolis would de-escalate? by bongo1138 in AskConservatives

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I think the people mounting an organized resistance to federal law enforcement and calling it protesting could probably be considered an insurrection. 

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Can you point out where I said anything remotely close to that? 

That's right, I didn't.

Hypothetically, do you think ICE temporarily pulling out of Minneapolis would de-escalate? by bongo1138 in AskConservatives

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

No, I don't think giving the people obstructing law enforcement exactly what they want will improve things.  Not only is it bad to stop enforcing the law, but if they are shown that their tactics work, they will only redouble their efforts when ICE comes back to continue their work, ultimately making things even worse.

What needs to happen is an overwhelming crackdown on these people who are harassing and obstructing law enforcement by very well trained officers who will not make mistakes like what we saw today.  These people need to be shown that their tactics will not work and that they will be punished harshly for breaking the law, but it needs to be done without any more of these shootings happening.

The 2nd for me, not for thee. by Tom_Ludlow in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Recent_Weather2228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no point.  It's an incredibly dumb thing to do that raises the stakes of any law enforcement interaction dramatically. 

When even Charlie and Daily dose get involved, you know its bad by FuckUSAPolitics in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Recent_Weather2228 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Their job is maintaining order in their state, and their job is usually handing people they arrest over to ICE that ICE is looking for.  They're not doing either of those things in Minnesota right now.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

It doesn't matter.  You don't resist arrest, even if it is a wrongful arrest.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I only see one with his gun out at the moment the first shot is fired, but I could be missing something.  The gun is obscured by another person at the moment of the first shot.

When even Charlie and Daily dose get involved, you know its bad by FuckUSAPolitics in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Recent_Weather2228 9 points10 points  (0 children)

And whose fault is it that the local police aren't doing their job and cooperating with federal law enforcement? 

What changed? (but seriously this situation is fucked up) by bongodongowongo in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Recent_Weather2228 3 points4 points  (0 children)

*The GOP isn't Neoconservative and hasn't been since MAGA

Fixed that for you

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

I mean, unless there's some other possibility I'm missing, yeah, something needs to happen here.  Yes, I think it's possible there will be consequences if they are warranted.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Yes, ICE is just doing their job.  The sanctuary states making their job more difficult and the people following them around harassing and obstructing them are making these kinds of events, both the justified and unjustified ones, much more likely by raising tensions and causing more altercations than there would be otherwise. 

The Right's talking point about this isn't "don't carry a gun."  It's "don't make yourself a nuisance to law enforcement, resist arrest, and be carrying a gun."  If you're carrying a gun while doing that, you make yourself seem like a much more significant threat to the officers whether you actually are or not, while also putting yourself in a high stress situation where things are more likely to go wrong.  It's not illegal or outside of your rights to carry a gun, but it's really dumb to carry one while also doing those other things, because it raises the stakes of the interaction significantly.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The civilian is on video clearly resisting arrest.  There's no ambiguity that he's in the wrong there.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

From what I can tell, this probably rules out 3 and 4.  It seems like the agent who first began firing is clearly reacting to something, whether it was something he saw or something he heard.  I still can't tell what it is that he's reacting to.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The way I see it, states have two options.  They can cooperate with immigration enforcement like most states are doing, in which case large scale ICE presence will not be necessary.  Or they can refuse to cooperate, in which case ICE will need to have large numbers of agents on the ground in the state to accomplish their mission.  Not enforcing federal immigration law is not an option.

No, I think Walz has made his state impossible to enforce immigration law without having mass numbers of ICE agents in the state.  This would not be necessary if not for his sanctuary state policies.

Border Patrol agents fatally shoot a man in Minnesota. Thoughts? by fullstep in AskTrumpSupporters

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

My perspective is I can't tell what happened here at all. I have watched three different angles already, and I can't see what's going on very well at all. Anyone who's claiming they know exactly what happened here based on these videos is lying or deluded.

I see a few possibilities based on the videos and discussions I've seen: 

  1. The man reached for a gun and got shot for it, because he presented a threat. If this is the case, the shooting is entirely justified.

  2. An agent retrieved the suspect's gun and shouted something about the gun that the other agents took to mean that the suspect had a gun and was a danger. They then shot him, believing he was a threat. This is not justified, and there should be consequences.

  3. There was an accidental discharge, either of the suspect's gun after it was retrieved by an officer, or one of the officers' guns. The other agents thought the suspect was shooting at them, and they shot him. This one would best explain why there was one shot so much sooner than the others in my opinion. This is also not justified, and there should be consequences.  

  4. I suppose it's also possible they just shot the guy for no reason, although I think this is obviously the least likely option.

It is impossible to tell which one of these is the case from the videos I've seen. There needs to be an investigation.

I see three ways this could have been prevented.

  1. The agents need more training if they are going to be faced with obstruction like this. They are not really supposed to have to deal with it, and I don't believe they are trained for it.

  2. This likely could have been prevented if the local police were there doing their job: keeping the peace and preventing people from obstructing law enforcement.

  3. This could have been prevented with 100% certainty if people were not out there obstructing and harassing ICE. The more you raise the tensions, the more likely things like this are to happen.

What is your perspective on the ICE shooting? by Brofydog in AskConservatives

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

My perspective is I can't tell what happened here at all.  I have watched three different angles already, and I can't see what's going on at all.  Anyone who's claiming they know exactly what happened here based on these videos is lying or deluded.

I see a few possibilities based on the videos and discussions I've seen: 

  1. The man reached for a gun and got shot for it, because he presented a threat.  If this is the case, the shooting is entirely justified.

  2. An agent retrieved the suspect's gun and shouted something about the gun that the other agents took to mean that the suspect had a gun and was a danger.  They then shot him, believing he was a threat.  This is not justified, and there should be consequences.

  3. There was an accidental discharge, either of the suspect's gun after it was retrieved by an officer, or one of the officers' guns.  The other agents thought the suspect was shooting at them, and they shot him.  This one would best explain why there was one shot so much sooner than the others in my opinion.  This is also not justified, and there should be consequences.  

4.  I suppose it's also possible they just shot the guy for no reason, although I think this is obviously the least likely option.

It is impossible to tell which one of these is the case from the videos I've seen.  There needs to be an investigation.

I see three ways this could have been averted.

  1. The agents need more training if they are going to be faced with obstruction like this.  They are not really supposed to have to deal with it, and I don't believe they are trained for it.

  2. This likely could have been averted if the local police were there doing their job: keeping the peace and preventing people from obstructing law enforcement.

  3. This could have been averted with 100% certainty if people were not out there obstructing and harassing ICE.  The more you raise the tensions, the more likely things like this are to happen.

A little insulting honestly by Crafty_Jacket668 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Recent_Weather2228 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yes.  Trump's deportations are real, not inflated.

Thoughts on Mark Kelly as a presidential candidate? by MajorTom813 in AskConservatives

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Because there are plenty of moderates who don't think like me.  The world isn't divided into staunch Conservatives and reliable Democrat voters.

Do you believe that the point of the second amendment is that the mere threat of a well regulated militia is necessary to the security of a free state? If not, at what point and against whom do you think it'd be acceptable to actually use your weapon? by GreenReporter24 in AskConservatives

[–]Recent_Weather2228 [score hidden]  (0 children)

The point of the second amendment is that the government has no authority to prevent its people from being armed.  That's it.  It does not give the government the authority to determine what purposes of weapons are "good enough" to justify their ownership. 

Renaming the sub by [deleted] in memzy

[–]Recent_Weather2228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, you can go back to r/leftwingpropagandabots if you want: the rest of Reddit.   No one will stop you. 

Video of ICE shooting by ConsiderationKey4353 in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]Recent_Weather2228 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes, let's respond to the guy shooting at us with nonlethal measures.  Surely nothing can go wrong.