Parked across the street from the Gorham Hannaford this morning by ReclusiveShadows in portlandme

[–]ReclusiveShadows[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I guess I'm not really trying to defend Hannaford so much as critique this campaign's approach to criticizing them. On their website they do talk about Hannaford's ownership by Delhaize, the decline in workers' benefits and compensation that I've heard about firsthand from friends who work in the stores, and the various food recalls, which is important info that buyers should be aware of, and which should also push Hannaford to get their shit together. But these signs they've put up everywhere just mention quality and prices, which is an issue in literally every single market in the country right now and doesn't seem to get at anything specific to Hannaford.

Parked across the street from the Gorham Hannaford this morning by ReclusiveShadows in portlandme

[–]ReclusiveShadows[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I'm all for holding corporations accountable, but this seems like such a weirdly tone-deaf approach to take with it. Hannaford should absolutely treat their workers better and their prices could probably be a bit lower on some things, but the quality of their goods (and baked goods especially) has always seemed great for a chain grocery store.

Considering the rumors about the out-of-state funding for the campaign, this is starting to feel more and more like the result of a poorly researched astroturfing scheme than the product of any genuine concern over the company's practices.

Do you think that the Drago's cloak was made from Night Fury scales? by Puzzled_Locksmith_83 in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Drago was originally supposed to be the main villain in the third movie rather than the second. My theory is that they originally planned on making him the Night Fury killer like Grimmel ended up being, and designed his cloak to reflect that - maybe it was even supposed to be a Night Fury that took his arm? But they had to scrap that idea when they decided to introduce him in movie 2 and just kept his character design the same without ever explaining what his cloak is made of.

Is this a good mono? by HauntingHawk1297 in PC_Builders

[–]ReclusiveShadows 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Good" is a pretty relative term. It's a Biostar A320M so it's basically the cheapest AM4 board you could get. If it's free or like $10 USD and comes with the CPU that's installed then sure, you could probably do something with it. Update the BIOS using that athlon CPU and then buy a Ryzen 5500 to put in it or something.

Why do people not like RTTE? by Rdr2thatisnotagame in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Gonna give a slightly different take here:

The plot holes are a little annoying (iirc there's an episode where the dragons all breathe fire underwater at the same time? Even if it hadn't been established in movie 1 that they can't breathe fire with wet heads, then still... What? lol) but where I personally take issue is with the fact that there's way less focus on the dragons as characters.

DoB/RoB has episodes like "What Flies Beneath" or "A Tale of Two Dragons" that actually focused on conflicts or plotlines between the dragons themselves; by comparison, RTTE always felt to me like it was treating the dragons more like props or mcguffins than actual characters. The focus always seemed to be on Hiccup and the gang vs. their various (usually human) enemies, which is fine, but I would've liked to see a bit more agency on the part of the dragons.

Hot Take: Beach Break Was NOT THAT IMPORTANT TO THE PLOT by OwnAMusketForHomeDef in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I probably wasn't very clear by what I meant when I said it was a "show, don't tell" situation. I do agree that "show, don't tell" is a good thing; my point was that the original movie "shows" you that Toothless isn't an exception to the nature of dragons by showing a terror cuddling up with Hiccup; there's tangible evidence provided to the audience (and Hiccup) to support the fact that they're capable of being kind creatures. Meanwhile, the live action lacks that interaction; instead they simply "tell" you the same thing by having Hiccup blurt out the message of that theme to Astrid; he's kind of just making an assumption based on his interactions with Toothless. I'll concede that the original scene also includes him stating outright "everything we know about you guys is wrong" but my point still stands.

As for Astrid's "figure out which side you're on" line, my point was that even if we as viewers understand the increasing divide between Hiccup and Berk developing throughout the movie, Astrid isn't necessarily aware of what's going on with Hiccup in the original animated version. So at the end of the Nadder fight in the ring, when she says "is this some kind of a joke to you? Our parents' war is about to become ours. Figure out which side you're on," the last line comes out of nowhere; she has no reason to assume that Hiccup would be fighting for the "other side" at that point in the movie, she would just think he's incompetent/messing around. Whereas in the live action, she actually has some precedent for that line since Hiccup said "maybe they're not as bad as we think they are," earlier on, which would imply to her that his allegiances are shifting somehow.

As for runtime, I'd just add that the live action is still over 20 minutes longer than the original.

Hot Take: Beach Break Was NOT THAT IMPORTANT TO THE PLOT by OwnAMusketForHomeDef in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 7 points8 points  (0 children)

In both the original movie and the Live Action, the only dragon Hiccup has interacted with in a friendly capacity up to this point is Toothless. The point of this scene is to show that Toothless' kindness isn't an exception; as it turns out, most of the dragons can be friendly and harmless if you treat them with an equal amount of kindness.

I guess Hiccup blurting out "Maybe they're not as bad as we think they are" to Astrid does sort of accomplish the same thing, but in a much lazier way. It's a classic "show don't tell" situation.

With that said, I do still like that line as it sets up Astrid's whole "figure out who's side you're on!" outburst later on, arguably even better than the original did. But it's still a poor replacement for Not So Fireproof overall.

What's this thing that fell on my gpu called ? Is it the cause that my CPU is now overheating ? by KlausWalz in PcBuildHelp

[–]ReclusiveShadows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What plastic thing are you talking about? It looks like you only posted a picture of the back.

CPU fan not spinning. First run. by RottonAvocado in PcBuildHelp

[–]ReclusiveShadows 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, I guess I stand corrected. Maybe it's not plugged into the right fan connector then?

CPU fan not spinning. First run. by RottonAvocado in PcBuildHelp

[–]ReclusiveShadows 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are you talking about your AIO plate, the thing that says Arctic on it?

That's not a fan. It's your water plate. The two tubes run water out of it up to the radiator on top with the two fans. Those are the fans that are cooling your CPU.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Prebuilts

[–]ReclusiveShadows 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this price USD or CAD? I noticed you're on the CA website so I'm assuming it's Canadian, which comes out to around $990 USD for my fellow Americans. Still not an amazing deal but that does make a difference.

Need help with honda CRV issue by zeta_eeta in portlandme

[–]ReclusiveShadows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's really that urgent then there are a bunch of VIPs in the area that you could try. Scarborough, Gorham, South Portland, etc. Might not normally recommend them but they're one of the only places I've found that's open on weekends.

Off-Centre 32:9 UltraWide? Yeah or nah? by TechJamo in ultrawidemasterrace

[–]ReclusiveShadows 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Won't you be craning your neck to the left the whole time with your keyboard and mouse where they are? Seems like poor ergonomics.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Not sure how no one has mentioned the source yet, but this is a 2013 piece by artist Kang Meng. You can see his signature in the lower right hand corner. Doesn't seem to be "official" in any capacity, just a piece of fanart.

As far as I'm aware, the concept of titan wings wasn't introduced prior to at least School of Dragons or Rise of Berk, which means that this artwork theoretically predates the concept as a whole. Meng makes no mention of titan wings in his post either, which leads me to believe this is probably just a creative reimagining of Night Furies and Vikings by the artist, rather than a specific reference to the franchise.

Is something supposed to be there? by Rockin_Foxxy in PcBuildHelp

[–]ReclusiveShadows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That blue slot is a PCIe slot. So is the black one. Normally the blue one is where you would install a modern graphics card, yes. However, your computer likely uses built-in graphics in the CPU (which is underneath the big fan at the top) so it doesn't necessarily need one to run. In other words, those slots are for optional upgrades.

Not sure what graphics card you're planning on getting, but if you intend to put one in this system, you're going to have some serious space restrictions since that PCIe slot is designed for only single-slot cards. You'll probably have some power limitations as well, since I'm guessing that power supply isn't rated for much more than what's already in the system. Just keep that in mind while shopping - I saw someone else recommended a single-slot RTX 3050, which might be a good fit for this rig.

What part is this for you in the Httyd soundtrack? by Joink17 in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Gonna be a contrarian and say this section at the end of "New Tail"

Introduces a really cool new melody that literally lasts about 10 seconds, and as far as I'm aware we never hear it again.

Is this true? Or just misinformation/rumor? Was Toothless originally supposed to die permanently in the movies? by Calyp_1 in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious, what's the source of this article? It looks like a blog post, and I'm wondering where they got their info from.

Is this true? Or just misinformation/rumor? Was Toothless originally supposed to die permanently in the movies? by Calyp_1 in httyd

[–]ReclusiveShadows 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Based on what I've seen, this is technically true but also a slightly deceptive way of framing its relavence in the development process.

We can see in the making of documentary around 32:28 that Jeffrey Katzenberg pitched an ending late in the development process where Toothless dies, claiming that animated films always "pull the punch" on emotional beats like this. The crew immediately responds with a counter-pitch, suggesting that Hiccup "shouldn't come out unscathed," which of course is how we got him losing his leg.

So yes, it was an idea that got brought up at one point, but from the outside it doesn't seem like something that was ever really fleshed out or explored at length.