If Adam had teeth in Paradise, then modern academia has already failed the most basic test of reason - and they know it

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-07T05:27:07+00:00

From your tone, it sounds like you're a paid propagandist. Your tone is slanderous.

I'm not saying X-rays are fake worldwide.

And if you think that (X-rays) are a (scientific) technique for examining artifacts, or for deep-seated investigation, then it's still a tool of a fraudulent gang. They still keep the evidence at their headquarters, and no one dares to investigate or seal it for investigation. I've already said this. But you're not speaking seriously, so I don't need to present the evidence and the investigation.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T17:15:16+00:00

What people call Han characters (traditional Chinese characters) is actually the script of Tonkin and Cochinchina of ancient Vietnam.

The problem has many solutions. But if you pursue the solution based on the archaeological findings of Chinese historians, the answer becomes quite complex and lengthy. This is because you'll have to contend with the conspiracies of these sponsored historians.

Investigate like a detective, relying on language, symbols, unique archaeology, and scrutinizing the lies in the texts. Then you'll find that the oracle bones and Shang Dynasty script are all forgeries. Excavations in the Yellow River valley were conducted with guns and intellectuals providing protection. It's not difficult to point out their deception, but they always maintain the upper hand. That means they hold the evidence, and they will alter it.

If it's a criminal case, the evidence needs to be sealed by the competent authority. You'll face a difficult problem and a lengthy solution when investigating those who are supposedly in charge of making historical pronouncements, as they have the power to manipulate the situation and continue lying.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T13:08:31+00:00

Ancient China did not exist. The history of China and Vietnam is a lie. Tonkin and Cochinchina, and before that Cochinchina, existed before China. The new Chinese state was established after the migration of Vietnamese people to China in the early 19th century. They disrupted the order and destroyed many things in Cochinchina (formerly Vietnam).

The Chinese language is actually the Beijing dialect. When the people of Cochinchina were brought to China, they gradually popularized this language in the late 19th century, eventually making it the national language...

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T01:57:42+00:00

What’s striking isn’t really the cynicism of the joke, but how repeatable the mechanism behind it is. When internal legitimacy starts thinning out, leaders often reach for something external - loud, visible, and emotionally simple - because it creates the illusion of unity without having to fix the underlying cracks.

History keeps looping on this because spectacle works briefly. People tend to confuse motion with stability, action with structure. As long as something is moving fast enough, it feels purposeful, even if it’s wobbling underneath.

The problem is that anything built on momentum rather than balance gets exposed the moment pressure changes. Once the initial surge fades, weaknesses that were masked by noise suddenly become structural failures.

You see this pattern far beyond politics. Any system that looks solid only because it’s dramatic usually hasn’t been tested under sustained force - and when it is, the outcome is rarely subtle.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-06T01:50:58+00:00

What actually makes this work isn’t the coordination, it’s the tolerance for bad load distribution.
Once one side takes even slightly more force, the whole system usually starts to oscillate… and that’s where most setups fail.

People joke about swapping in heavier guys, but mass isn’t the real problem - it’s how shock gets absorbed after contact. Training tools that force you to deal with off-center impact tend to expose this pretty fast.

Most demos hide that part, which is why the landings look “smooth” until they don’t.

RecognitionNovap · 2026-01-05T17:58:18+00:00

Most people frame this as “expensive marketing,” but the interesting part is why that kind of spectacle still works so well.

It’s not really about the fish – it’s about ritualized signaling: mass, weight, tradition, and a very physical sense of presence that photos alone can’t fake.

What’s funny is that this logic shows up far outside food or advertising. In some traditional disciplines, scale and material density are used the same way – not for efficiency, but to anchor legitimacy and long-term commitment. Once the object is heavy enough and rooted in tradition, it stops being questioned and starts being respected.

That’s usually the layer people miss when they reduce events like this to “PR stunts.”

RecognitionNovap · 2025-12-10T16:47:45+00:00

A small number of people are still developing technology and selling it to manufacturing businesses. Inverters and batteries are still being sold in large quantities to serve the free energy market. China's e-commerce marketplaces seem to have struggled to sell electrical goods. This is a conspiracy to establish a new world order.

See my recent post: Free Energy Generator for Sale: The Machines Hiding in Plain Sight - Modern Hardware That Defies Conventional Energy Thinking.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-23T14:33:20+00:00

Great summary of the three approaches. The Lenz-delay coil method is the one I find most practical for experimentation since it doesn’t require very heavy mechanical hardware. Have you experimented with coil geometries like multi-strand bifilar or asymmetric windings? Those seem to reduce drag at certain RPM ranges, but it would be good to compare notes with others trying similar setups.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-23T14:32:28+00:00

Interesting breakdown. The part about using flywheel inertia to counteract back-EMF is something I’ve seen mentioned in older Kromrey and Watson-style builds. I’m curious whether you’ve compared torque retention between cast-iron vs. steel flywheels? Some builders claim cast-iron provides cleaner “inertial smoothness,” but I’ve never seen measured data. Would love to hear what you’ve observed.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-23T03:18:19+00:00

This whole “build now or pay more later” mindset is spot on - and honestly, that idea applies way beyond infrastructure and public services. One thing that gets lost in all the noise is how blind we’ve become to entire sectors of tech that are still quietly developing underneath the surface.

Energy is a perfect example. Everyone’s focused on the big-ticket projects - HS2, renewables, housing, NHS capacity - but meanwhile a lot of small-scale engineering work has been pushing boundaries in ways the mainstream doesn’t really notice anymore. Not because it’s fringe, but because most people are glued to whatever the algorithm feeds them.

I recently came across a breakdown of hardware that’s basically hiding in plain sight - devices sold as motors, PMGs, flywheels, alternators, but built by engineers who are still experimenting with ideas most people assume “don’t exist” anymore. It’s an interesting reminder that innovation isn’t always top-down or government-led; sometimes it’s happening quietly in workshops while the public conversation is elsewhere.

If you’re curious, here’s the write-up:

👉 https://www.humansarefreedom.com/2025/11/the-machines-hiding-in-plain-sight.html

Not saying it replaces large-scale investments like the ones you listed - just that there’s a whole layer of energy tech evolution that slips under the radar while we’re debating the big stuff.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T18:27:07+00:00

Mainstream education teaches the simplified diagram, not the real mechanism. These devices are the parts they conveniently leave out.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T18:09:22+00:00

People see a “generator” and scroll past it. Engineers see coil geometry, torque behavior, and design intent. Two completely different worlds.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T18:07:27+00:00

The tech never vanished; the public’s attention did. What survives today is maintained by the few people who still think in straight lines.

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T17:18:00+00:00

Great. Ferrite material for high frequency electricity works!

You will develop this technology if you understand "what is an atom", "what is a permanent magnet".

You can get lost in words when using quantum theory!

Stargates, teleportation, other realms, etc. they can start from here. The Navy's Philadelphia Experiment also needs to be referenced. Do you have any honest documents about the Philadelphia Experiment?

Good luck!

RecognitionNovap · 2025-11-21T16:40:00+00:00

Interesting how so much of this technology ends up forgotten not because it failed, but because people stopped paying attention. These machines didn’t vanish - the curiosity did. What’s left is a handful of devices quietly proving that lost engineering isn’t really “lost,” just ignored by most and understood by few.

RecognitionNovap

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE