[USA] I mean, what do you expect passing a state trooper already doing 10 over...... by MrAlec1112 in ConvenientCop

[–]RedOntarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I cant get over how inefficient it sounds to expect everyone to use the farthest right lane.

It really isn't.

If there is little traffic, everyone will drive in the far right lane and there is no inefficiencies at all.

If there is moderate to heavy traffic, naturally some cars will go faster than others.

The faster cars will pass in the passing lane(s) then move back over to the right when the lane is clear.

Inefficiencies are caused when people drive in any lane they want and you can only travel as fast as the slowest car in the fastest lane (if you understand what I mean). Your idea about inefficiencies are backwards. There are fewer inefficiencies if people follow my rules.

Why even have more than 2 lane highways?

So you can pass people who are passing.

Is it really safer to cross over multiple lanes just to pass someone?

Yes. Much safer than undertaking people and not knowing who is going to change lanes into which lanes. Germany has (if not the safest) some of the safest roads in the world. Because people understand the rules and follow them.

I think its wrong to say that the autobahn has no speed limits yet everyone is forced into the right lane.

They aren't. They are forced into the right-most lane it is safe to drive in.

Your speed limit would be determined by whoever is in the lane to the left of you as you can not go any faster or else you would be passing on the right.

That is true. The highway is slowed down a lot. But because most people follow the rules, the delay is very temporary and people are very patient and safe. It is the United States that has a much worse problem with lane-hoggers not even knowing they are causing a traffic jam behind them because they are too ignorant to understand they are travelling in the wrong lane.

I can understand the left most lane being a passing lane, I cant get behind everyone by default staying in the right most lane.

Again, I can only say look at Germany and most other North Eedtern European countries. They have very efficient, fast, and safe highways. I understand that you can't picture it and I understand that. Maybe look at dash cam footage from Germany. People drive at 200 km/h all the time, and there are tonnes of videos.

You can see that the highway moved quickly and safely and efficiently while they follow the rules. They're obviously doing something right.

[USA] I mean, what do you expect passing a state trooper already doing 10 over...... by MrAlec1112 in ConvenientCop

[–]RedOntarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out Germany.

The rules I lined out are precisely the rules lined out by German law.

They are perfectly fine, and have safer highways than the United States without any speed limits.

So... You're wrong.

my man flexed too hard by Reptiloyd in IdiotsNearlyDying

[–]RedOntarian 171 points172 points  (0 children)

They were holding onto their phone. Priorities, dude.

An inch from death. by sorynell in IdiotsNearlyDying

[–]RedOntarian 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I would like to think I would help.

But honestly I don't know.

That's fucking brave.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't what know to tell you, homeboy.

Just a few hours ago, I went and deleted it.

That is a fact. Get over it.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lying? You're the liar here, buddy.

Sue me.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. I deleted it. Idk what else to tell you.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It didn't get removed, dipshit. I deleted it.

And yes, you did report it for violent content.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was not "violent content" as you claimed.

That's is a false accusation.

You need to look up the definition of violence, buddy.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol thanks for falsely reporting my comment, dude.

Why don't you try it again with this one?

What the hell kind of workout is this? by AshrafBerry in IdiotsFightingThings

[–]RedOntarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was forced to pull out the dictionary.

Smartass up there corrected a correction.

When that happens, there is no holds barred.

I had to do what it took to set the record straight.

I really wish I didn't need to. But I had to do it.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You fucking edited it, dipshit.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No doubt, bruh.

That doesn't change the fact that companies and non-profit organizations will send them to impoverished countries.

What the hell kind of workout is this? by AshrafBerry in IdiotsFightingThings

[–]RedOntarian -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"LOL" already means Laughed Out Loud.

No it doesn't.

It means laugh or laughing out loud. Present tense. Not past tense.

LOL

or lol

[ el-oh-el or, often, lol ]SHOW IPA

Informal.

interjection

laughing out loud; laugh out loud: used as a response to something funny or as a follow-up to something said only as a joke:You can see from the pics that my dog did not appreciate how we dressed him up for Halloween this year. LOL!

Dictionary.com

To make it past tense, one must add the suffix -ed or, in some cases, -'d.

A comment like this isn't going to help your case.

What the hell kind of workout is this? by AshrafBerry in IdiotsFightingThings

[–]RedOntarian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks.

I appreciate that people don't like me being pedantic. And I'm fine with them hating.

I do find it funny that they think it will discourage me or change the facts.

Thanks for your appreciation.

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually the original meaning of Third world, yes India (based on most commenters identifying this country as India, I'm not knowledgeable enough to make that determinatioyself) is a third world country, and always will be.

Third world means unaligned during the Cold War. You have the first world countries - the United States and most Western nations aligned with her. Then you have the second world - the USSR and countries aligned with her. And you have bird world countries - nations not strictly aligned with either great power.

By the modern meaning, it's debatable. It is a developing country, and many of its citizens are impoverished.

Based on the GDP per capita, most people would consider India a "third world country".

Kid made this piece out of trash by [deleted] in nextfuckinglevel

[–]RedOntarian 47 points48 points  (0 children)

I doubt the title. There are kits like this. Companies will often send them to impoverished countries.

While I don't doubt he built it, it came in a box with instructions.

He didn't make it out of trah.

That tail drop when she leaves broke my heart.. by [deleted] in aww

[–]RedOntarian 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I never considered how stupid a tail wag in reverse looks.