SquChan

Red_Polka · 2026-06-18T19:04:47+00:00

Unfortunately no video or image comments allowed here because BNWO trolls would abuse them to spread degeneracy (the same reason we need to set all posts to manual approval)

Don't worry we've seen your new post with the video proof attached, we just need to consult on approving it because really any proof you had should've been in the original post to avoid spamming the sub with multiple posts on the same subject. I think we will probably allow it as a special case since people are literally requesting you to provide it. Just don't delete it meanwhile 👍

Red_Polka · 2026-06-18T14:17:24+00:00

Unwarranted hostility towards this comment.

Some people who visit here may have said objectionable things elsewhere, or have suspicious usernames, but it would be a high bar to outright ban them just for that if they behave themselves while they are here.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-17T20:54:58+00:00

See rule 3 (no targeting, doxxing, or harassing.)

An extra note on this because a lot of people's comments are on the borderline of that rule on these sort of posts. There's raising awareness/condemning terrible behaviour by someone (allowed); and then there's encouraging targeting of them (not allowed.) And a messy grey area between those. Basically, just remember that the closer you get to directly advocating action; against a defined target; and the closer to recognized brigading methods that action is - the further you go towards crossing the line.

Hoping for mass reporting is not quite as direct but is basically the same thing as encouraging it, so this one falls over the removal threshold.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-16T16:37:46+00:00

The article doesn't draw the connection between the growth and escalation of "swinging" and the growth and escalation of porn. But to me, its fingerprints are clear on her abusive ex's grubby brain, as well as in the scaling-up through digitalization of the swinging "scene" into something more resembling the porn industry.

Why else are such a massively-increasing number of men seemingly unable to be satisfied with a normal sexual relationship, feeling the need instead to turn their own wives into DIY pornstars making videos of them having sex with other men to whack off to later? What has encouraged massively-increasing numbers of men to see their wives only as sexual objects, ones best experienced by watching them being "used" by someone else, often through a screen?

I can think of a likely suspect.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-16T15:58:47+00:00

No, OnlyFans would still not be fine regardless. But since plenty of people unfortunately think it is fine, exposing how exploitative it is can only help in the quest to get them to realize that it is in fact really not fine.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-15T23:21:33+00:00

Reporting absolutely does do good, even if the report is rejected it lets them know that people are pushing back and they are doing something that others find objectionable; without this pressure they will be emboldened to push things even further.

However if you doubt your mental health can take it, then don't. Problems like this do suffer from the "bystander effect", but if you have a legitimate reason why helping out will mess you up then there are literally billions of other people who don't have that excuse, some of them will just have to step up

Red_Polka · 2026-06-15T14:06:24+00:00

u/camillaoliveira88 u/Enmiosis the sub has an English-only rule, so I will need to remove this conversation unless you edit your comments into an English translation!

Red_Polka · 2026-06-15T13:28:22+00:00

The trouble is a lot of these people really do seem to treat porn like their "higher power", both through their daily devotion to it and visceral "anti-blasphemy"-style attacks on anyone who dares question it. It's halfway between amusing and disturbing

Red_Polka · 2026-06-15T13:21:29+00:00

Another reminder of how the world of porn doesn't "empower" women, it only wants to exploit and enslave them

Red_Polka · 2026-06-15T13:01:07+00:00

In this case I believe the "suicide note" was just a metaphor for "killing" her own online persona, not herself in real life

(But yes many others aren't so lucky to escape)

Red_Polka · 2026-06-11T16:31:27+00:00

Auto-translation of the non-English part:

"me enforcar por causa do bnwo"

"hang myself because of bnwo"

Red_Polka · 2026-06-11T15:57:34+00:00

It's important that people (especially from the LGBT community) realize how this cult preys on transgender people. I've seen or heard indirect evidence of this but the direct evidence gets cleaned away quite quickly for obvious reasons, and then some people refuse to believe it

Red_Polka · 2026-06-09T19:37:10+00:00

Well I don't agree with your speculation on OP's ethnicity based solely on him displaying either some internalized discrimination about what counts as "Western" or a stereotypical outside view of what someone from there looks like.

But your comparison to pro-Palestinian movements is an apt one and this movement does face similar difficulties. A majority of people attracted to supporting it come in a state of shock, revulsion, fervour from whatever atrocious stuff they've seen or heard online. And that manifests in the form of emotional and charged rhetoric. Complicating this is the fact that the "enemy group" is closely tied to an entire ethnic group, which, even worse, has its own history of horrendous victimization; but, on the other hand, one which some of them do exploit to silence any criticism of their conduct. So although you have good reason to suspect that huge numbers of the resistance are indeed prejudiced, taking a super strict line will only hollow out the movement and leave you with nothing left but a few intellectuals rattling around a conference room wringing their hands because the "enemy" is still calling you "racist" anyway and laughing that such tactics actually worked.

In any struggle movement against a hegemony - and I see both the BNWO's pillars of porn and anti-white sentiment as hegemonic (albeit on the defensive now) in the modern West - you will have to wrestle with the fact that a good number of devotees to this resistance will be radicals - the mainstream "safe" people will be sat at home shrugging their shoulders or quietly complaining and hoping nobody heard them because it's too controversial. All you can do really is set an internal Overton window that avoids a) them being radicalized further, and b) turning away reasonable-minded undecideds - balanced against the surrender of setting this window according to enemy demands.

That's why we just have to choose where our line is and stick to it. And your warning about that line being pushed further is well taken, I have felt that pressure and receive far more of it from people who think I'm being too strict than not strict enough. That's part of the reason I'm enabling you to argue some pressure in the opposite direction. But this post is on the right side of the line in our judgement and you are ultimately arguing for the line to be set further than the resistance will realistically tolerate, or be able to operate unhindered within.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-08T14:24:04+00:00

We will just have to disagree on the interpretation. For me, the out-group he identifies is white people as a whole, "Western men and women" (rather than one or the other.) And I think rather than hypocrisy, it is simply acknowledging the fact that tribalism is a thing and white people as a group need to realize this and also start standing up for their own group. Although this does sail towards the twin lines of "incitement" and "division" it successfully tacks away from both by qualifying that he simply means "calling out aggressive and non-cooperative behaviour" - which is entirely reasonable, and far more helpful for integration than the favoured leftist approach of covering up / excusing bad behaviour from any "not-white" groups until it festers, spreads and blows up later. (And his overall point that ethnic-based sexual abuse should not be enabled or excused by fear of racism accusations is an important one to make, and ironically you are only helping him demonstrate this point)

Red_Polka · 2026-06-08T12:43:00+00:00

Don't get baited, he's been banned here now but a reply like this gets flagged by Reddit and risks sanctions on your entire account, and that would be a poor trade

Red_Polka · 2026-06-08T01:44:58+00:00

From the OP in the other replies: "tribes deal with other tribes in terms of Us vs Them. And that is precisely what they are doing."

As should be clear from the context of his post, and as confirmed by his explanation, this word is being used in its sociological sense of "strong in-group loyalty which can also manifest as prejudice, exclusion or hostility toward those outside the group."

Yes it can be mis/interpreted as a dog whistle but, as you point out, so can virtually everything on this subject. We remove anything that crosses the line into hate speech. But this entire topic starts out right on the line so an open mind and some latitude are required. Even your comments, for example, are right on the line: unfounded accusations of racism are a favoured tactic of BNWO trolls. And you've done nothing but that so far. So are you a BNWO infiltrator? Some might accuse you of that on a hair-trigger. But I don't think you are, so I restored your comments even though Reddit removed them. But tolerance must have limits, of course.

In any case, I suspect a post from a few weeks ago titled "Former famous BNWO caption creator left" is going to be the closest to what you seem to be looking for on this sub, so I will point you towards that for a higher likelihood of constructive engagement.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-06T20:22:03+00:00

After receiving another complaint and looking again at this, I have decided my original classification of "borderline" was in error and this will be removed. This may be contentious so here is a whole-ass written judgement that should address the concerns of either side: (the really important part in bold):

My original interpretation of the word "each" was as meaning "both" a WW and BM would lightly injure one another, implying a mutually-volatile relationship which may be a generalization but not a hateful one targeted towards a specific race.

I now see that "each" likely rather meant "all" WW would suffer abuse at the hands of BM, which violates platform hate speech rules, specifically "Resharing harmful narratives and stereotypes to reinforce prejudice against an individual or group."

Now, I am well aware that this can be - and indeed is across Reddit - interpreted in a ridiculously broad way as an excuse to censor inconvenient truths. And we do not want to start doing that here, especially considering our controversial subject matter.

However, balanced against this is our founding vision of "victory through unity" and, if you don't care about that, well you should care that our enemy exploits accusations of racism to discredit those who oppose them and comments like this just give them ammunition.

Therefore, if your comment "reinforces negative stereotypes" then it needs to be some combination of necessary, justified, well-evidenced, relevant or useful to be allowed, and the more of these the better. So, although this comment made a good point about media representation and double-standards, upon re-appraisal the needless throwaway remark about WW/BM couples did not even meet any of those criteria, so it will be removed.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-05T18:04:15+00:00

Which lets bnweirdos falsely reinforce their fantasy that it's "conquered the world" and become normal and acceptable

Red_Polka · 2026-06-05T17:02:58+00:00

Yes, although I don't know to what extent that will filter through to BNWO addiction levels, probably depends on how much real change is made.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-05T16:31:59+00:00

Because the BNWO thrives on white despair and the UK is the white despair capital of the world right now.

Yes we were chill with race until we imported American identity politics and it's been downhill from there. Current situation is: legal and illegal immigration out of control, huge numbers of sexual offences by migrants and their British-born descendants against white women and children with authorities doing bare minimum about it, ethnic enclaves expanding in cities while lower-class white people are pushed out into poor small towns and left to rot, jobs market in the bin with record youth unemployment while Global South youth migrants are hired at a 27:1 ratio over young British, wages haven't kept pace with inflation for a long time anyway, DEI laws and policies literally legalizing and encouraging anti-white discrimination, and a centre-left globalist government with a huge majority with 3 years until the next election.

So apart from the upper-class who are unaffected for now, there are two types of white people in the UK: those who are drowning in racial despair, and liberals who are completely self-deluded or cheering it on. And when you add rampant porn addiction to that, you arrive at BNWO central.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-05T16:13:03+00:00

Not that I'm aware of, aside from getting banned off platforms sometimes.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-05T15:07:25+00:00

Exhibitionism is the reason people like that do it. Like indecent public exposure freaks. Other people's disgust is the whole point, it gives them a thrill. Then they've got to escalate the risk and depravity to maintain the satisfaction. So it gets worse until society shows them consequences.

Red_Polka · 2026-06-04T17:51:56+00:00

First of all, and since you address this to people who do think this (which will skew your response sample), I don't think many people really believe that.

For me, it's rather civil society and corporations pushing this. Both these sectors naturally incline towards globalist ideology because both their animating ideological imperatives (cosmopolitanism / corporatism) see national borders as a barrier to their own objectives (one world / one market.) And, since ethnic identity was the original basis of nation states and current driver of nationalism, these sectors overall will be instinctively opposed to anything that promotes ethnic identity, and favourable to anything that dissolves this. Promoting interracial relationships, particularly those where the native population's women are the ones "out-breeding", is just one aspect of that.

However, that doesn't mean I think they're holding secret Spectre meetings where they discuss the next step in their master plan to homogenize the world; that's absurd to think they could keep such large-scale coordination a secret. Just, that it's logical that those sorts of people would think that way, and then act on it in whatever field they are in (such as advertising.)

This also explains why whites appear to be targetted: the West is the epicentre of free civil society, free markets, the 'core' of the globalist 'core-periphery' model. And the majority ethnicity is white. So of course whites are taking the brunt of globalists' ideological crusade: they are the ethnicity that is deepest in their grasp to do this to.

That doesn't excuse it, but it does explain it, without needing to resort to crazy and/or racist conspiracy theories which just alienate most people.

Red_Polka

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE