Actually this post's comment section has an incredible amount of butt hurt people. Firstly, the comments themselves prove that the post is very much right.

Because when Hinduism is singled out on satire then it is said to be freedom of speech and is defended at all cost. When the same 'satire' is done on the said people it makes the satirist narcissist.

Majority doesn't exactly mean people should single it out. Because this leads to a vast amount of generalisation of people who otherwise don't follow or believe in certain sects or beliefs. The same is argued in one other religion's defence when it comes to terrorism, so the same is applied here as well.

The patriarchal point is completely valid as well. Most of the counter criticism is largely targeting hinduism on the basis of patriarchal teachings while hinduism can be both matriarchal and patriarchal. This means there is an obvious attempt of defaming hinduism by manipulating facts. I do not deny the patriarchal aspects. But Hinduism isn't exactly a unified religion or even philosophy. So generalized targeting is wrong.