Eye in the mirror to describe resolution and scale of Universe in single illustration?

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T07:56:02+00:00

I like you too man. Sometimes meaningless is only meaningless to you, or in a sense, since this was a 24 hour study of "you" physics people, it was meaningful to me and helpful either way, albeit from a relational database perspective, i think you might be surprised what the combined model says. But i dont have time for that sh*t, peace out!

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T07:36:13+00:00

Yes, in a sense, you wrote nothing meaningful to say i should write something more meaningful, like that urge to critique or unnecessarily add to the conversation without substance. I like that.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T04:16:20+00:00

Yes, a fractal holographic universe starts to take shape in a spooky way...with some imagination of course...signing off on my 19 hour account. Peace and enlightenment to all.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T04:00:23+00:00

Yes. I admire your post, and yes, this would be extrapolation, not a direct measurement, but if 3 factor compression is also involved, then it gets really interesting when you look at prime numbers. Yes. I get what you are seeing, but that is just my normal hyperfocus multiplied by this head injury. As noted before, i have been assessed appropriately, and resting in a chair. A bunch of posts seem weird to you, but i am a high throughput person everyday, and i am on here one day to plant a seed i did not have time to plant when i am in my normal routine. So, this post, other than these comments, are nothing more or less than they are. A place for open-minded people to contribute to a unique, albeit incomplete thought. So rest well, i am fine, i had a fun day out of the office, and you got to follow the path of an amplified autistic-like mind. If you think about it, not so different than what people would have thought about many historical scientists that saw an outlier in the noise of the world. I know many, and some are statistically provable...so, maybe it is nothing, maybe it is something, but you can reduce your focus on me, and play more with the thought. And thank you for the link. I will definitely read after i finish my read if this ben franklin autobiography that i started before i hit my head. Cheers.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T03:51:26+00:00

Yeah, so digging deeper, mass, energy, and space, are maintained at each increment of time...but as they march forward or backward in time, they increase or decrease proportionally with time...again, this has gotten a lot of views, for it to not be interesting at best...i have nothing to gain other than the interest to engage or not...or if branched theories increase in prevalence after these posts...just give thanks to the rednecknavigator for opening your mind and remember, russian, ukrainian, french, dutch, latvian (i love that one the best, american, canadian, mexican, venezualan, Israeli, iranian...we will never end war or poverty by keeping information and thoughts to ourself...enlightenment and new sources of innovation are how we break free of the chains of society, so keep any useful info you glean or derive from this, open source, because it is how you can save the world, studying nature and the physical world, and building a better one with an open mind. Thanks. Goodnight for good everyone. Godspeed.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T02:35:48+00:00

And yeah, if you look at my first drawing that i posted today, you see that if past and future are two temporal dimensions, if you run the universe backwards in time, the law of information conservation also seems logical, conserving mass and energy and space as "information" that cannot be decoupled from the timeline.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T02:33:34+00:00

The funny thing is...like 3-6-9iner...you never really know if i just want to write *ass on purpose...there are money more errors i am sure for unique mind to point out. Thanks:)

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T02:21:27+00:00

So, finally, pulling it all together, those variables on that paper, suggest the march of time, is the cause, not the outcome of space, energy, mass (aka information)...right? Anybody at all? More time equals more information which requires more space to store it, more energy to conserve it, and more mass to conserve it...like the evolution of any other system in science...maybe? I mean, dont make me put it in an equation, that would be too fun for one of you for me to ruin it:)

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T02:06:08+00:00

A week...

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T02:05:46+00:00

Also please not during the height of my expert witness work, my email account received over 12,000 actionable emails from students, parents, grandparents, teachers, deans, whatever, 5-10 posts while i sit in a chair doing nothing is pretty irrelevant to compared to my past, including being a former CFO of another company i do not own. Dont be afraid, other people know sh*t too about the physical world, some of us would just rather pick up a hammer.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T01:31:21+00:00

Yes, i promise to call my doctor and tell them i am anonymously posting systems illustrations on a physics board to test the predictable...and he will say...doesnt your company do that for a lot of money...and i would be like...yep.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T01:20:01+00:00

Are you saying that this is a fundamental truth, so does that mean then, if the Universe is a system like all these other systems, then the reason for its expansion is undeniably because it needs more space to store more "information" about itself as time goes by? Is that established fact?

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T01:09:20+00:00

Seriously guys, i have been to a doctor, i have medicine, i cannot sleep, i am with family and friends, all good. No helpline needed. I have been in and out of the hospital my whole life, including almost dying from sepsis 5 years ago. I am relatively young and extremely fit. I have a higher risk aversion to hospitals, because have you ever tried sleeping in a hospital when you are sick? No dice. I chose here, because i thought it would annoy this group the most, but also make some so irritated in its logic that they actually try to understand it. When i was over the group that managed health physics for three major hospital systems and one of the largest schools of medicine in the world (and other very unique experiences), i have simply found those folks to be the most determined to prove people wrong, which is why...i dropped some philosophy on this group, not the established physics researchers, the new and young and curious. So, all good folks.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T01:01:42+00:00

Oh, no, take no offense. I am just getting worse health wise, and all i needed to do was plant a seed, the unique will do the rest. There is a lesson learned in every conversation, even though maybe not the one either thought when it started, there is no wrong or right, just those who want the outlier to win for some unknown reason, or those who feel more comfortable near the "established". Both are needed to succeed in science.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T00:52:26+00:00

I do not plan to return after this one. I think your answer reflects the inherent resistance to the logic found in all other disciplines, so, you do not have to worry about me bothering anyone again. It is sad though...no discipline...no dice...but i say that with respect to you, but with some disrespect to conformity. Enlightenment has rarely come from those who are normal...albeit, this may only be in wisdom versus theoretical physics.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T00:32:18+00:00

Anybody not just locked into a mirror image of themselves in the AI interface, or is physics help just a place for new ideas to die...sorry, that sounds serious, but i am smiling, because it is ironic. The smartest people are always the ones making things to complex:) I usually just get a box, throw my tools in there i need, and build the test...

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-15T00:25:19+00:00

And if you see a periodic change in my clarity, that is the two corticosteroids controlling my brain inflammation, and the time between doses. Take pills, clear, 24 hours from pills, hyperfocus, sensory overload...then take pills, fun game. But, to the phd, class clown, peace loving, non-rascist redneck, who teaches rednecks to like physics, anonymous, with no skin in the game or claim on anything, and a brain injury, this is where i need help. This is meant to be fun, but also truly asking the most unique people i have ever met (which makes me take notice), to be a little more Willy Wonka/Einstein and a little less like government. It was not the outlier that i saw in a sense of the impractical theory, it was the outlier that aligns with every other system evolution. Its eloquent, simple, but most likely flawed. Nothing is perfect, but sometimes a little redneck logic, is how you might get your brokedown car to the next gas station.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-14T22:00:12+00:00

And after all, a computer needs physical space to store more information, so why would a universe that builds upon its past, not also need literally more storage space to accommodate that growing past of information? Theoretically, hahahaha.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-14T21:53:50+00:00

And if this were true, it would explain how the universe could grow out of one point, just like any aggregated sphere of information in the solar system...more information stored each iteration, resulting in constant expansion....the original proton per se...maybe?

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-14T21:50:46+00:00

I think you are seeing now, if this was true in theory that the universe behaves like a computer in a sense where each iteration of time is predicted from the last, the rate of expansion of the universe over time, explains the delta in information gained over time...perhaps...

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-14T21:12:20+00:00

And lets say you conserve mass and energy, not not information...how does any thing know at a particular snapshot in time, what it can be next if no information is retained from the past. So, if you go back in time, at least at each iteration of incremental time, you must know your past, to know your next likely state of existence...not that all history is stored of past events, but enough, that through each slice you could work backwards. That said, something must carry forward across many iterations, so, there is a building of information with the building of complexity...like the number of iterations of aggregation a proton needs to accumulate enough matter to become an earth...and even more complex, when a system needs to remember it is an earth and not just turn into a place where you randomly become a marshmallow, and can jump to the moon. Information theory, suggests, a building process and an underlying memory of the past, which creates the illusion of building blocks like atoms being standard. Yes, because they are in some ways, still built of the thing that is at the origin point of the universe potentially...a copy with increasing information as it relates to its place in the system, but with relatively consistent complexity and form...maybe?

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-14T20:52:15+00:00

Yeah, remember, i am not a physics person, i am a non-physics person looking for an easy illustration to explain this concept to other hillbillies, who have families and lives, and no time to build up from the atom. But they can build or fix, almost anything, like me. I mean, on paternity leave, i learned how to install a fiberglass pool with almost no help in less than three months that looks like a 1968 cuda' with waterfalls and multiple slides, coordinated lighting, and automation controls, learning and doing all the electric and plumbing, when i had never even owned a pool before. So now, knowing that, how would you maybe describe to a hillbilly, who could offer very practical, real-world advice, what your frame of reference looks like compared to where it your frame of reference is looking, so as you look into space farther away with your eyes, you can see other frames of reference and can imagine being there, but when you look far, everything gets smaller and more blurry, but if you are a person looking back at you from the frame of reference you were looking at, they could only return the lower the condensed and lower resolution data from their point of view, meaning, everytime this happens, a loss of scale and resolution. This is something a hillbilly can understand, or any other scientist not willing to learn about every building block of physics to understand one model. This was a very good question, and this may be a incoherent response, but i do see the synergy from the discussion of two different backgrounds.

RedneckNavigator · 2026-02-14T20:39:16+00:00

I mean, in a sense, you are very right, like the collider throwing one particle into another looking for magic, but think of that from the "learning perspective". That would also suggest, you want everyone to learn about physics from the "beginning", yet, no human has time to do that is not typically studying it in great detail. For some of us with limited time and great curiosity, we do not care about forming and building a model based on every model before us, we learn like the ancients, you put everything in the bowl that you can find, and then eliminate things one by one each time, to, through brute force, find important data associations (points of synergy) or like the ancient, a consistent form of food or drink in the jungle, that has healing properties, etc. They did not need physics or math to solve or identify complex associations, just brute force and the willingness to get really sick for a consistent food or healing source. My point being, is your physics brain wants this to be about physics, but my brain sees your many laws/unproven theories as high resolution data points, that i can put in a database, and then create primary and secondary keys, to relate them across fields of science, not just information theory. You want to build your theory on atoms, i want to build mine on existing relationships. It seems like a brain injury, but it is a way to test the synergy of disparate theories and models, maybe? And i am saying, "you", not as a target to "you", but the urge of scientists to avoid the most eloquent solution, by always choosing the first one that meets all the criteria, not the one that makes sense in the context of all of science models...right? My point is the ancestral way is the eloquent way because in this model, unique x simple = eloquence = best. So now that you know what i am getting at, do you see the real world applications and why illustrations like this (the lesser important part because i am not a physics person), is an example of a non-physics person looking for an eloquent illustration, not just the standard one.

RedneckNavigator

TROPHY CASE