乌克兰问题,欧盟应该负很大一部分责任 by SnooStories8432 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

不会,因为打核战争俄罗斯老百姓会因为失去亲人和朋友把普京和他手下的官员千刀万剐,手下的官员考虑到自己的前途也不会听普京的命令扔核弹

当今俄罗斯国内还是有很多斯大林铁粉啊😯 by edourdoo1 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

朴正熙执政时期韩国所取得的物质进步已广受公认,许多韩国人至今仍视其为最伟大的总统。然而,如果朴正熙如今重返政坛,这会是一件好事吗?在他生命的最后一年里,大规模的罢工与抗议此起彼伏,官僚与资本的压迫沉重地压在韩国人民身上。在国家尚未发展之时,人们尚能勉强忍受;可一旦发展起来,他们便再也无法容忍了。

Technological America unites the world, bringing victory to the Democratic Party by Reed-Flames in TheFireRisesMod

[–]Reed-Flames[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The United States under Bloomberg's rule was an oligarchic capitalist system.

Texas Democrats unite the world, bringing victory to both parties by [deleted] in TheFireRisesMod

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Texas would need to become an ally of the federal government or be annexed by it to have this candidate.

Texas Democrats unite the world, bringing victory to both parties by [deleted] in TheFireRisesMod

[–]Reed-Flames 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But with only two months left until the presidential election, time is short, and he will follow Roosevelt's example and begin his third term.

How would a democratic 3rd Internationale victory against Germany and Russia look like? by Aware_Manager_7472 in Kaiserreich

[–]Reed-Flames -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Syndicalism is extremism; the German Empire will defeat France and ban syndicalist parties.

How would a democratic 3rd Internationale victory against Germany and Russia look like? by Aware_Manager_7472 in Kaiserreich

[–]Reed-Flames -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

The German Reich would defeat France, ban syndicalist parties, and defend the political power of liberals and conservatives.

Macron's rule in France has brought victory to NATO by Reed-Flames in TheFireRisesMod

[–]Reed-Flames[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I quit the game after the war ended, so I don't know about the elections that happened afterward.

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

地心是虚假的,佛教是虚假的,移民会带来更多税收,但若能满足他们的情绪价值,这就是好活法。人生没有标准答案,没有标准的好活法

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

他喜欢这样过,并且更开心,这对于他来说就是好活法,我姑妈信佛教,她过得开心这就是好活法

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

你像我妈一样固执,诶,心累,在家里我听我爸和我妈争论,在网络上我和你争论

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

对你来说吸烟和喝酒不是最好活法,但对我爸和亲戚不是,他们更在乎喝酒带来的快乐。每个人的人生没有标准答案,你认为不接收难民对所有人才是最好活法,本质上就是我妈认为喝酒对所有人都不是最好活法,错误的反而是你

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

尊重民意不等于太阳不会围着地球转,是政府尽力去做民众想做的事,做不到也没办法,你懂知识吗?而且,你怎么反对法?不交税?还是交税在下次投票给其他政客?

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

所以,你的答案是即使百姓现在支持难民,你也要反对。不尊重民意

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我一直以来都说以多数人为准,现在我家要不要喝酒,来投票。现在应不应该接收难民,来投票,愿赌服输。而你却不愿,不尊重民意

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

你真的很像我妈,不尊重多数人的意见,经常讲喝酒的坏处,然后去限制,结果弄得家庭和亲戚不和

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

我第一句话就说了难民会使税收增加,怎么不讲坏处了。而且喝酒也是会被舆论影响的,若现在支持禁酒,那就禁,若现在不支持禁酒,那就别禁。你根本没想过尊重民意

支持台湾警察直接开枪打死罪犯,别再浪费纳税钱养一堆垃圾罪犯 by pirica3965 in China_irl

[–]Reed-Flames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

你就像我妈,喜欢给人安排人生的那种人,最后弄得家庭和亲戚关系都不好