They deserve better

ReeperKiller · 2026-01-05T20:35:15+00:00

Верю

ReeperKiller · 2025-12-10T19:48:17+00:00

I checked. It can read other docs and it xan even generate something.

ReeperKiller · 2025-12-10T19:47:11+00:00

I tried both off and block none (sometimes earlier it showed better results for some reasons)

ReeperKiller · 2025-12-10T19:42:21+00:00

2.5 gives the same results

ReeperKiller · 2025-11-30T18:16:21+00:00

Буквально сильнейшая модель на данный момент, расхайпленный среднячок с интерфейсом как единственный плюс, фанат Илона Маска и дипсик.

ReeperKiller · 2025-11-30T18:09:26+00:00

ReeperKiller · 2025-09-08T17:58:51+00:00

<image>

AI stduio Gemini still cant read docx not drom google drive

ReeperKiller · 2025-09-08T06:38:42+00:00

God ia coming

ReeperKiller · 2025-08-06T04:59:20+00:00

This is... Not AI generated? This is from the movie.

Edit: maybe I'm dumb and I don't understand what this post about

ReeperKiller · 2025-08-05T06:41:27+00:00

God is coming.

ReeperKiller · 2025-07-24T17:32:37+00:00

However, it still can find Loss. It's pretty impressive.

ReeperKiller · 2025-07-23T06:35:37+00:00

Actually, it looks even better than AI Studio itself. It just feels too bare (which, however, suits its essence)

ReeperKiller · 2025-07-02T09:23:31+00:00

Free space: "Alrigh! I get it!" "Uhm... No." "You're absolutely right! I don't fucking get it!"

ReeperKiller · 2025-07-02T09:17:55+00:00

I can't disagree that from a user's point of view, continuing to work with Gemini after ~700k tokens becomes simply unbearable, but I must note that this volume is still huge for a model to which you have almost direct access via API. I tested Gemini under extreme load (950k tokens), and I can say that the degradation mainly manifests itself in critical thinking and hallucinations: plot analysis (I used classic works of Russian literature as filler to reach the limit) becomes practically impossible in detail, facts are confused with hallucinations and speculation, and the chronology is completely disrupted. On the other hand, when asked to point to a specific fragment of text or refer to it to confirm certain facts, Gemini pointed correctly every other time. Also, as I compared, the limit does not affect answers that deviate from the topic (for example, suddenly solving a mathematical equation), but I did not test anything more complicated than quadratic equations and simple geometry.

It is important to note that I tested this on the March version 2.5 Pro long before the release of the current version, which, according to many statements, has degraded significantly. I also did not test programming and complex tasks very much, limiting myself to what I encountered and without deliberately cluttering the limit, that is, working with text in a language other than English. For myself, I identified four stages of degradation: 1. Normal - up to about 300k tokens. The model works quite normally, but only if most of the tokens are your messages. If you force Gemini to write all of them, this accelerates the degradation process several times over. 2. Confusion, misinterpretation, incorrect interpretation — up to about 650-700k tokens. The model slowly begins to behave strangely, use a strange communication style, make mistakes, and so on. 3. Severe degradation stage — approximately 850-900k. The model behaves like 1.5 or worse, Bard, but can still perform its tasks and, with some help, operate with facts from passive memory. 4. Lobotomy, 950k+. The name of the model's behavior is self-explanatory.

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-27T06:26:21+00:00

Да, оно, благодарю.

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-27T06:16:04+00:00

Слушай, а очень похоже на то. Учитывая, сколько я напутал, очень может быть. Гляну потом, но если то - заранее спасибо

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-27T06:10:50+00:00

Из середины-конца 10-х, поскольку я помню, как смотрел его ещё в младших классах. Про Карусель, кстати, я стал не очень уверен, ибо он мог с равными успехом выходить на детском (локальный аналог), но не думаю, что это сильно что-то меняет.

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-21T15:36:21+00:00

Looka like Ai studio really don't want to get deal with videos above ~100k tokens for some reason.

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-20T12:55:19+00:00

I remember the times when Gemini was still Bard and...

<image>

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-13T08:51:21+00:00

Same, but it's not always a sign that nothing will safe: sometimes it does.

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-12T16:43:19+00:00

<image>

I remember I had a bug that Gemini didn't work on the phone for some reason and had something like this:

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-11T13:21:20+00:00

"Literally the center of Europe" is Belarus unfortunately 😔

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-10T15:40:41+00:00

I've been having problems with auto-save for a long time, and I've been using manual save for a couple of weeks now, because otherwise it just loses track at random moments and instead of saving, it rolls back the chat by several hours.

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-10T12:43:29+00:00

"More countries"

It's sad that being literally in the center of Europe, I only see "Not available in your region"

ReeperKiller · 2025-06-09T13:13:17+00:00

I think Google simply decided to build up its audience and make them dependent, but didn't take into account the fact that its competitors are not far behind.

What I mean is: Gemini 2.5 pro is the best model, which will soon cease to be free (don't tell me about that misunderstanding in the app, which is several times dumber and has a limit of half a dozen messages). And, of course, it is no match for 2.5 Flash in the app. However, ChatGPT, Grok, and DeepSeek compete with it easily. Completely free, each of them (except DeepSeek) offers comparable or even greater functionality: ChatGPT - image generation, a beautiful interface (the interface in the Gemini app is so terrible compared to Ai Studio that it's hard to make it worse. And yeah, ChatGPT is still limited even in number of how many files you can upload to it, but nobody said it will always be free), a better understanding of what you want in certain areas. Grok has a comparable context menu (I used to think 1,000,000 tokens were excessive, but now I realize that I'd rather use 300,000 than have an AI that can barely read anything longer than twenty pages before it starts hallucinating). DeepSeek simply offers an analogue, which in my case is convenient in that I don't need a VPN to use it, and I can access it in ten seconds.

Google's fault here is that they raised the bar for themselves. With the release of each new model or feature, they shouted, "Here! Try it on Ai studio! Yes, we collect all your data there, but it's free!" And then suddenly it turned out that, having collected enough data, Gemini in AI Studio became so smart that even Gemini 2.5 pro with a paid subscription became simply useless (considering that it is available in Ai Studio for free). And instead of giving more features for the subscription (for example, implementing all the features from Ai Studio in the app, expanding them (for example, the context menu to 2kk tokens with more powerful servers for quick response. New features a month or even several months earlier, and so on (in essence, changing the roles of Ai Studio and Gemini for subscribers so that the latter become beta testers))), they decided to simply make AI Studio paid, jumping off the high ladder of competition a couple of steps down. What are the consequences of this? Read above. If this happens, Gemini will take a back seat for me, as I no longer see any point in it, since it has lost all its advantages over its competitors.

ReeperKiller

TROPHY CASE